Information between 19th October 2025 - 29th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 319 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 321 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 171 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 322 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 174 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - China Spying Case - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 327 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Stamp Duty Land Tax - View Vote Context Anna Dixon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 329 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Anna Dixon speeches from: Sentencing Bill
Anna Dixon contributed 6 speeches (348 words) Committee of the whole House Tuesday 21st October 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Palliative Care
Asked by: Anna Dixon (Labour - Shipley) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans he has to strengthen statutory guidance related to the legal duty to commission palliative care services included in the Health and Care Act 2022. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Palliative care services are included in the list of services an integrated care board (ICB) must commission. This promotes a more consistent national approach and supports commissioners in prioritising palliative care and end of life care. To support ICBs in this duty, NHS England has published statutory guidance and service specifications. The statutory guidance states that ICBs must work to ensure that there is sufficient provision of care services to meet the needs of their local populations, which can include hospice services, available within the ICB catchment. There are no current plans to update the statutory guidance. The ICBs are expected to follow the statutory guidance in exercising their functions and must pay due regard to it in the planning, commissioning, and delivery of palliative care and end of life care services. Additionally, NHS England has a legal duty to annually assess the performance of each ICB in respect of each financial year and to publish a summary of its findings. This assessment must assess how well the ICB has discharged its functions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Independent Water Commission
Asked by: Anna Dixon (Labour - Shipley) Monday 27th October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will publish the (a) evidence base and (b) consultation submissions used to inform the findings and recommendations of the final report of the Independent Water Commission, published on 21 July 2025. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Independent Water Commission was established to operate independently of Government. It is therefore for the Commission, not the Government, to decide whether to publish the evidence base and consultation submissions that informed its final report.
The Independent Water Commission sought to collect a broad range of views on the challenges that the water system faces in England and Wales. As such the Commission ran a Call for Evidence that received over 50,000 responses, from a wide range of individuals, groups and organisations. Further detail on how the Call for Evidence was run and the stakeholders that engaged with it can be found in the Final Summary of Responses in Annex A which is accessible on Gov.uk. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CIFAS: Bank Services
Asked by: Anna Dixon (Labour - Shipley) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will take steps to help people with CIFAS markers to access banking facilities to enable them to receive (a) wages and (b) welfare payments. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) CIFAS, the UK’s fraud prevention service, plays a vital role in protecting individuals and the financial system from fraud and financial crime. Its work supports the Government’s broader efforts to tackle fraud and maintain trust in the financial system. The Government also recognises the importance of ensuring that individuals can access banking services to receive wages and welfare payments. Where individuals face barriers when accessing banking services, alternative options may be available. The nine largest personal current account providers in the UK are legally required to offer basic bank accounts to customers who do not have a bank account or are not eligible for a standard current account. These accounts are fee-free and provide essential banking services, though they do not include overdrafts or cheque books. Beyond the high street banks, other options for people to make and receive payments may include payment and electronic money institutions. If someone with a CIFAS marker wishes to further understand the information that CIFAS holds against them, they may wish to make a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) to CIFAS
Furthermore, if an individual believes that a CIFAS marker has been incorrectly assigned, they should first raise it with the organisation that recorded it to the CIFAS database for them to review. If the organisation does not remove the marker then the individual can reach out directly to CIFAS following the process outlined in its complaints procedure. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Personal Independence Payment: West Yorkshire
Asked by: Anna Dixon (Labour - Shipley) Wednesday 22nd October 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the current average time taken was for a DWP-initiated PIP review to be completed in West Yorkshire in each of the last 12 months. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The table below provides information on the median number of weeks taken to complete a Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Award Review (AR) for claimants living in West Yorkshire local authority districts. The time taken is measured from the date of AR registration to the date of completion. Figures are presented for each month in which ARs were completed, covering the 12-month period up to and including July 2025.
Table 1: Median time in weeks from PIP Award Review registration to completion, by month of completion, for the West Yorkshire local authority area.
Our aim as always is to make an award decision as quickly as possible, taking into account all available evidence, including that from the claimant. We are taking steps to improve the service by prioritising new claims, to ensure new claimants are paid as soon as possible whilst safeguarding claimants awaiting award reviews, who have returned their information as required, to ensure their payments continue until their review can be completed.
Notes: - Figures have been rounded to the nearest whole number of weeks. - Figures are for the following West Yorkshire local authorities: Bradford, Calderdale, Kirklees, Leeds and Wakefield. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performing Arts: Children
Asked by: Anna Dixon (Labour - Shipley) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when she next plans to review the Children (Performance and Activities) (England) Regulations 2014. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The government recognises the need to review the Children (Performance and Activities) (England) Regulations 2014, and we are committed to doing so. This will require careful consideration of how such a review might best be conducted to ensure that children are able to continue to access positive performance opportunities in the future, while also making sure that their safety, wellbeing and best interests are protected. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 11th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Ministry of Justice Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Justice (including Topical Questions) Clive Jones: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Bob Blackman: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to reform human rights laws. Lincoln Jopp: What discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the use of catapults as offensive weapons. Claire Young: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Peter Lamb: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Liz Saville Roberts: What his Department's policy is on the use of the Welsh language in prisons. Wera Hobhouse: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Ian Sollom: What steps she is taking to support the Probation Service. Edward Leigh: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Beccy Cooper: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help tackle violence against women and girls. Bradley Thomas: What steps his Department is taking to help support the Probation Service to manage repeat offenders who cross jurisdictional boundaries to avoid supervision. John Cooper: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Ben Maguire: What steps he is taking to increase access to legal aid for people in rural areas. Harpreet Uppal: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Ian Lavery: What steps his Department is taking to help increase access to justice for people from all social backgrounds. Rachel Hopkins: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Bradley Thomas: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Andrew Cooper: What steps his Department is taking to use technology to improve the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Jacob Collier: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Helen Morgan: What steps he is taking to tackle backlogs in the courts. Jonathan Brash: What assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of the number of prisoners serving Imprisonment for Public Protection sentences. Mary Kelly Foy: What recent assessment he has made of the potential merits of lowering the pension age of prison officers. Elsie Blundell: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help support victims of technology-assisted child sexual abuse. Roz Savage: What steps she is taking through the criminal justice system to help support victims of environmental crimes. Fred Thomas: What steps his Department is taking to help improve rehabilitation outcomes for people with unspent convictions. Anna Dixon: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help tackle violence against women and girls. Andy McDonald: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help ensure that workers receive tribunal awards in cases where the respondent company has entered administration. Vikki Slade: What steps his Department is taking to provide adequate funding for the courts system. Julian Smith: Whether he plans to bring forward legislative proposals on litigation funding agreements. Gagan Mohindra: What steps he is taking to help support victims of crime through the criminal justice system. Olivia Blake: When he plans to increase legal aid fees. Mike Reader: What steps his Department is taking to provide adequate funding to the Probation Service for meeting its additional responsibilities in the Sentencing Bill. Sarah Owen: What steps his Department is taking to support victims of rape and sexual violence through the court system. Al Pinkerton: What assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of safeguards for preventing harm to children during court-ordered contact arrangements. Luke Murphy: What steps he is taking to help tackle court backlogs. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025
Report - 50th Report - Local bus services in England Public Accounts Committee Found: Labour; Sheffield South East) Nesil Caliskan (Labour; Barking) Mr Luke Charters (Labour; York Outer) Anna Dixon |
|
Friday 24th October 2025
Report - 49th Report - Administration of the Civil Service Pension Scheme Public Accounts Committee Found: Labour; Sheffield South East) Nesil Caliskan (Labour; Barking) Mr Luke Charters (Labour; York Outer) Anna Dixon |
|
Thursday 23rd October 2025
Oral Evidence - Ministry of Justice, Legal Aid Agency, Ministry of Justice, HMPPS, and Ministry of Justice Public Accounts Committee Found: We will start with Anna Dixon, please. Q1 Anna Dixon: Thank you, Chair, and welcome witnesses. |
|
Wednesday 22nd October 2025
Report - 48th Report - Smarter delivery of public services Public Accounts Committee Found: Labour; Sheffield South East) Nesil Caliskan (Labour; Barking) Mr Luke Charters (Labour; York Outer) Anna Dixon |
|
Monday 20th October 2025
Oral Evidence - Cabinet Office, HM Treasury, HM Treasury, and DSIT Public Accounts Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Chair); Mr Clive Betts; Anna Dixon; Sarah |
|
Thursday 16th October 2025
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Ministry of Justice, HM Treasury, and HM Treasury Public Accounts Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Chair); Mr Clive Betts; Anna Dixon; Sarah |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 19th January 2026 3 p.m. Public Accounts Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |