(13 years, 1 month ago)
Commons ChamberThat is a bit rich coming from a representative of a party that was in government for 13 years and had the opportunity to introduce such an ombudsman, which is something that this Government are now setting about doing.
7. What estimate she has made of the proportion of livestock slaughtered in England that was reared in the UK in the last year for which figures are available.
The vast majority of livestock slaughtered in England will have been reared in the United Kingdom. A small number, including some spent hens, are from the Republic of Ireland, and a very small number will be imported from mainland Europe for slaughter rather than for breeding purposes.
I thank the Minister for his response. The transport of livestock over long distances can cause unnecessary suffering and distress. Does he agree that where possible the slaughter of animals should be done locally, to avoid that distress and long transportation?
I think that most people entirely agree with my hon. Friend, and certainly I do. We want to encourage the slaughtering of animals locally wherever possible. Not only is it good for welfare reasons, it is good for local employment and fits in with local food, which we all want to encourage.
(13 years, 2 months ago)
Commons ChamberAnimal welfare matters to the British people, but we in the House have a duty and responsibility to make decisions on issues relating to animal welfare based on facts, knowledge and science. If we make decisions based purely on opinion polls and emotions, we shall get ourselves into great difficulty. I heard nothing in the speech of the hon. Member for The Wrekin (Mark Pritchard) about the actual welfare of animals.
Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
I will give way in a moment.
We have to base our decisions on cool hard facts and knowledge of the situation. The speeches I have heard today do not show that; they have avoided the real animal welfare issues and are pandering to the emotions of animal rights activists who care more about their political agenda than about the real welfare of animals.
I condemn utterly and totally cruelty to animals of any kind. I was the shadow Minister for animal welfare for three years before the last election, and I had the same instincts as many people in the Chamber today and many of the people who respond to opinion polls, when they say, “Isn’t it dreadful. It should be banned. How awful this is.”
May I make some progress before I give way?
Instead of basing my views purely on what the newspapers or the opinion polls say, I looked into the matter. The truth is that in this country only a small number of animals are in circuses: 39 in total. They are not captured from the jungle and dragged to the circus; many have been born and bred in circuses for generations. [Interruption.] Their entire rhythm of life is based—
Not at the moment.
For those animals, their entire rhythm of life is based on what they have known since they were born. On the face of it—
May I continue?
On the face of it, I agree that it looks to many people as though it is all very cruel, but in reality many of those animals have been so domesticated over so many years that to wrench them from the life they are used to would be crueller than allowing them to continue it. The Government have to implement welfare and we already have the Animal Welfare Act 2006. If there is real cruelty to animals, we can use existing legislation or, as the Government propose, licensing to deal with it. [Interruption.] It is amazing that we are focusing on an area where there is almost no cruelty—[Hon. Members: “There is.”] There isn’t. [Interruption.] No one wants to hear the facts—[Interruption.] They don’t.
I am fed up with animals being used as a political football. If Members want to campaign for animal welfare, they should look at the facts, examine the reality and not use it to promote a political agenda. I am afraid to say that certain animal welfare organisations—[Interruption.]
Order. Mr Rosindell is not giving way, so persistent requests are not helping the situation. I am sure he will let the House know when he is ready to take an intervention.
I should like to take interventions, Mr Deputy Speaker, but I am being shouted down, which is not very fair, especially from a Green MP—I should have thought that she would want to hear the other point of view.
I am a champion for animal welfare, but I shall not just follow the crowd. I shall look at the facts. What is being proposed is worse than those poor animals are used to; their entire life has been in the environment they were brought up in. Wrenching them away from the people who have looked after them, loved them and cared for them would obliterate their rhythm of life and would be crueller than allowing it to continue. I shall now give way.
The hon. Gentleman says that he wants science. What about the science from the British Veterinary Association, which says:
“the welfare needs of non-domesticated, wild animals cannot be met within the environment of a travelling circus…A licensing scheme will not address these issues”?
The BVA is one of the most respected scientific organisations for animal welfare in this country. What does he say to that?
Non-domesticated—they are wild animals, but when lions and tigers are 10th generation born in that environment, we are no longer talking about a lion taken out of its natural environment and dragged into the circus. I am afraid to say that the issue is often used by organisations for fundraising. Charities and animal rights groups raise money, and the issue is raised to attract political support and donations, by whipping up emotions instead of treating the facts as they are.
No, I will not.
We have the Animal Welfare Act 2006—a brilliant piece of legislation from the last Government, which we supported—and it can be used when cruelty occurs, but I appeal to the House: do not go with the crowd, look at the facts, do not wrench those creatures away from the life that they are used to and have grown up in. If you do that, you will be more cruel than leaving them where they are, with the people and in the environment that they are used to.
Will my hon. Friend share with the House his views on whether third-generation slaves in the United States, born into slavery, were content with slavery, more so than those who were enslaved in the first place?
I am afraid to say that I am sorry that the debate is being dragged to such a level. Instead of dealing with the facts, you are ultimately saying that animals—
Order. Once again, I can see that emotions are running high, but I remind the House that when you say, “you”, you mean me.
I knew that my views would be unpopular, but I ask hon. Members perhaps to take something away from what I am saying, because I believe passionately in animal welfare. I looked at this for three years. I visited circuses. I spoke to people who deal with training the animals, and I know that they are loved and cared for. This is like a pack hunting a tiny bit of tradition that still exists in this country, where animal welfare standards are greatly considered and animals are loved and cared for. I am afraid to say that, if we rush to make a decision based on pure emotion and opinion polls, I really think that it will be an irresponsible decision. We should look at the facts. We should understand the long-term interests of animal welfare and use existing legislation to deal with this issue.
(13 years, 2 months ago)
Ministerial CorrectionsTo ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much money her Department allocated to each local authority for animal health and welfare work in each of the last three financial years.
[Official Report, 27 April 2011, Vol. 527, c. 409-12W.]
Letter of correction from Mr Jim Paice:
Four errors have been identified in the table accompanying the written answer given to the hon. Member for Romford (Andrew Rosindell) on 27 April 2011. The incorrect figures, all relating to the 2010-11 financial year, were Barnsley £23,266, Bradford £38,080, Kirklees £29,640 and South Tyneside £3,020.
The correct answer should have been:
DEFRA funding allocated to each local authority for animal health and welfare work in each of the last three financial years is shown in the following table:
Local authority | 2008-09 | 2009-10 | 2010-11 |
---|---|---|---|
Barnsley | 24,474 | 28,274 | 23,274 |
Bath and North East Somerset | 60,015 | 60,015 | 60,015 |
Bedford | — | 19,338 | 19,338 |
Bedfordshire | 48,345 | — | — |
Birmingham | 27,815 | 28,515 | 27,315 |
Blackburn with Darwen | 6,052 | 5,465 | 4,074 |
Blackpool | 385 | 385 | 385 |
Blaenau Gwent | 16,841 | 16,841 | 16,841 |
Bolton | 12,208 | 12,208 | 12,208 |
Bradford | 39,080 | 41,080 | 39,080 |
Bridgend | 35,462 | 35,462 | 35,462 |
Buckinghamshire | 88,924 | 88,924 | 88,924 |
Bury | 2,901 | 2,901 | 2,901 |
Caerphilly | 22,521 | 20,414 | 20,414 |
Calderdale | 54,699 | 54,699 | 54,699 |
Cambridgeshire | 72,975 | 72,975 | 72,975 |
Cardiff | 5,103 | 7,103 | 7,103 |
Carmarthenshire | 192,297 | 178,296 | 192,296 |
Central Bedfordshire | — | 29,007 | 29,007 |
Ceredigion | 195,113 | 179,113 | 195,113 |
Cheshire (East) | — | 56,000 | 49,930 |
Cheshire (West and Chester) | — | 48,500 | 48,500 |
Cheshire | 93,080 | — | — |
City of London (Chelmsford) | 10,180 | 10,180 | 10,180 |
City of London (Reigate) | 12,673 | 12,673 | 12,673 |
City of London (Reading) | — | — | 1,685 |
City of London (Wokingham and Reading) | 10,852 | 10,852 | — |
City of York | 10,850 | 10,850 | 10,850 |
Conwy | 146,284 | 146,000 | 146,000 |
Cornwall | 140,389 | 160,389 | 140,389 |
Coventry | 4,000 | 5,000 | 6,000 |
Cumbria | 290,826 | 256,342 | 264,539 |
Darlington | 36,649 | 36,649 | 36,647 |
Denbighshire | 136,372 | 136,372 | 136,272 |
Derby City | 6,692 | 5,792 | 5,792 |
Derbyshire | 199,112 | 196,543 | 181,539 |
Devon | 501,678 | 505,733 | 500,733 |
Doncaster | 51,456 | 46,456 | 46,456 |
Dorset | 109,780 | 101,885 | 114,960 |
Dudley | 17,870 | 17,870 | 17,870 |
Durham | 81,567 | 87,567 | 82,567 |
East Riding of Yorkshire | 209,483 | 214,483 | 209,483 |
East Sussex | 53,611 | 53,611 | 53,611 |
Essex | 150,996 | 130,996 | 150,996 |
Flintshire | 73,930 | 73,930 | 73,930 |
Gateshead | 2,018 | 2,018 | 2,018 |
Gloucestershire | 196,970 | 201,190 | 192,720 |
Gwynedd | 130,937 | 130,937 | 130,937 |
Halton | — | — | 1,033 |
Hampshire | 38,108 | 38,108 | 38,108 |
Hartlepool | 7,050 | 4,550 | 4,550 |
Havering | 2,000 | 14,000 | 14,000 |
Herefordshire | 119,768 | 119,768 | 114,768 |
Hertfordshire | 26,285 | 26,285 | 26,285 |
Isle of Anglesey | 96,018 | 96,018 | 82,018 |
Isle of Wight | 34,449 | 28,949 | 32,449 |
Isles of Scilly | — | 22,000 | 22,000 |
Kent | 208,188 | 206,677 | 203,170 |
Kirklees | 31,357 | 33,657 | 29,657 |
Lancashire | 339,945 | 339,945 | 339,945 |
Leeds | 29,049 | 29,049 | 29,049 |
Leicestershire | 62,736 | 62,736 | 62,671 |
Lincolnshire | 173,691 | 173,691 | 173,691 |
Med way | 8,240 | 8,240 | 8,240 |
Merthyr Tydfil | 71,856 | 66,856 | 66,856 |
Middles | 936 | 936 | 936 |
Milton Keynes | 37,725 | 18,037 | 25,089 |
Monmouthshire including Torfaen | 128,705 | 135,943 | 155,228 |
Newcastle | 34,920 | 34,800 | 33,970 |
Newport | 70,412 | 38,937 | 37,873 |
Norfolk | 129,284 | 129,284 | 129,284 |
North Lincolnshire | 23,520 | 23,520 | 23,520 |
North Somerset | 30,158 | 30,158 | 30,158 |
North Tyneside | 12,431 | 12,431 | 12,431 |
North Yorkshire | 374,691 | 404,691 | 414,691 |
Northamptonshire | 84,872 | 79,644 | 79,644 |
Northumberland | 178,377 | 178,377 | 178,377 |
Nottinghamshire | 89,433 | 89,433 | 89,433 |
Oldham | 52,694 | 45,428 | 45,428 |
Oxfordshire | 113,198 | 112,929 | 111,629 |
Pembrokeshire | 133,560 | 133,560 | 133,560 |
Peter | 9,668 | 9,668 | 9,668 |
Powys | 259,260 | 262,260 | 253,260 |
Redcar and Cleveland | 4,046 | 4,046 | 3,727 |
Rhondda Cynon Taf | 50,659 | 50,659 | 50,659 |
Rochdale | 2,885 | 3,335 | 3,335 |
Rotherham | 33,188 | 33,188 | 33,188 |
Rutland | 10,839 | 10,839 | 10,839 |
St Helens | 2,788 | — | — |
Salford | — | 1,494 | 1,313 |
Sandwell | 6,357 | 6,357 | 6,357 |
Sefton | 4,994 | 4,994 | 4,994 |
Sheffield | 38,059 | 42,700 | 36,169 |
Shropshire | 127,332 | 131,782 | 127,320 |
Slough | — | — | 6,000 |
Solihull | 18,113 | 18,113 | 18,113 |
Somerset | 234,469 | 232,469 | 224,469 |
South Gloucester | 69,309 | 66,309 | 66,309 |
South Tyneside | 740 | 1,200 | 330 |
Staffordshire | 270,467 | 293,767 | 268,767 |
Stockport | — | 3,658 | 5,593 |
Stockton | 13,727 | 13,727 | 13,727 |
Stoke on Trent | 8,570 | 8,570 | 8,570 |
Suffolk | 120,884 | 120,884 | 120,884 |
Surrey | 134,777 | 132,841 | 132,841 |
Swindon | 5,242 | 5,242 | 5,242 |
Tameside | 630 | 630 | 630 |
Telford and Wrekin | 30,618 | 30,618 | 30,618 |
Trafford | — | 3,711 | 3,711 |
Vale of Glamorgan | 23,350 | 23,350 | 23,350 |
Wakefield | 32,452 | 37,764 | 32,452 |
Walsall | 4,401 | 4,401 | 4,401 |
Warrington | 9,491 | 9,491 | 9,491 |
Warwickshire | 127,828 | 132,000 | 131,000 |
West Berkshire and Wokingham | — | — | 27,061 |
West Berkshire | 27,061 | 27,061 | — |
West Glamorgan | 65,356 | 65,356 | 64,416 |
West Sussex | 46,743 | 44,743 | 44,743 |
Wigan | 8,000 | 6,087 | 6,087 |
Wiltshire | 60,912 | 60,912 | 60,912 |
Windsor and Maidenhead | 38,117 | 34,542 | 34,542 |
Wirral | 473 | 2,008 | 2,008 |
Wokingham | — | — | 9,167 |
Wolverhampton | 3,934 | 3,934 | 3,873 |
Worcestershire | 215,909 | 202,709 | 180,630 |
Wrexham | 57,208 | 57,208 | 57,208 |
Source: Core DEFRA |
(13 years, 8 months ago)
Commons ChamberI am extremely grateful to the Minister, but may I remind those on the Treasury Bench that there are a lot of questions to get through, and that a little economy is needed in their answers?
12. What recent steps her Department has taken to maintain the level of biodiversity.
We will act on agreements reached at the successful biodiversity conference in Nagoya through a new biodiversity strategy for England, which will be published alongside the natural environment White Paper in the spring.
Will the Secretary of State outline the Government’s policies on the protection of biodiversity in our 16 British overseas territories? In particular, will she tell us what the Government are doing to protect the biodiversity of the Henderson island, one of the Pitcairn Islands, where an appalling rat infestation has caused 25,000 chicks to be killed every year?
I think that everyone in the House is well aware of my hon. Friend’s concern about, and interest in, the overseas territories. I am delighted to be able to tell him that while attending the biodiversity conference, and the day before, I was able to announce additional spending under the Darwin initiative and, specifically, help with the protection of the Henderson petrel.