Information between 19th March 2026 - 29th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 273 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 161 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 167 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 158 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 149 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Defence - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 306 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Oil and Gas - View Vote Context Andrew Ranger voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 297 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Andrew Ranger (Labour - Wrexham) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether he plans to review how shared care arrangements are reflected in the child maintenance and benefits systems for separated parents; and what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of support available to parents who share custody of their children on an equal or near-equal basis but are not designated as the main carer for the purposes of benefit eligibility. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Government recognises that shared care arrangements can play an important role in supporting children to maintain relationships with both parents after separation.
In the child maintenance system, shared care is reflected in the maintenance calculation. Where a child stays overnight with the paying parent for at least one night a week on average, the amount of maintenance due is reduced to reflect the care provided.
If the Child Maintenance Service is satisfied that both parents have equal day-to-day care for the child, in addition to sharing overnight care, there is no requirement for either parent to pay child maintenance.
Across the social security system more broadly, entitlement to benefits is generally based on the identification of who has main responsibility for the child, reflecting the need for a clear and administrable basis for determining entitlement. This approach applies consistently across benefits such as Child Benefit and Universal Credit.
As part of wider work on Child Maintenance reforms, we are working to modernise the Child Maintenance calculation to ensure that it is fair, better reflects the cost of raising children today and encourages willing and able compliance. |
|
Teachers: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: Andrew Ranger (Labour - Wrexham) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to reduce the time taken to issue Remediable Service Statements to members of the Teachers’ Pensions Scheme following the McCloud judgment. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) I refer my hon. Friend the Member for Wrexham to the answer of 20 March 2026 to Question 112455. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026 2 p.m. Welsh Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |