Debates between Andrew Murrison and Lord Campbell of Pittenweem during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Murrison and Lord Campbell of Pittenweem
Monday 12th May 2014

(10 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Murrison Portrait Dr Murrison
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman says that there are no ocean-going vessels, but he has forgotten the submarine service, which, for a Scottish MP, is a huge omission. He talks about maritime patrol aircraft, but he says nothing about how he would analyse the data that maritime patrol aircraft are designed to collect. He talks about two warships, yet he tells us in his White Paper that the only way he can refuel them, and thus extend their scope, is by relying on the Royal Navy.

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem Portrait Sir Menzies Campbell (North East Fife) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As someone who was born in Glasgow and at one stage lived close to Yarrows, as it then was, my hon. Friend will understand that I have a particular interest in the future of shipbuilding on the Clyde. Were Scotland to become independent, improbable though that may be, can he conceive of any circumstances in which the Government of the rest of the United Kingdom would wish to place orders in what would then effectively be a foreign country?

Andrew Murrison Portrait Dr Murrison
- Hansard - -

We have not ordered warships from another country for 100 years, outside the two world wars. Article 346 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union makes the situation clear: it would not be possible to order such vessels in the event that Scotland and the United Kingdom became foreign countries to one another.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Murrison and Lord Campbell of Pittenweem
Monday 17th March 2014

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Murrison Portrait Dr Murrison
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman is right to raise that point. He will know that the UK’s preparations are reckoned to be far advanced, but he will also understand that cyber-defence is a sovereign capability. However, it is important that supranational institutions such as NATO ensure that their own systems are protected from cyber-attack.

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem Portrait Sir Menzies Campbell (North East Fife) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

May we have an assurance that if there is any discussion of Ukraine at the NATO summit, careful attention will be paid to the defence anxieties of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia about what appears to be the emergence of a Putin doctrine, not least because of the close proximity of Kaliningrad to all three countries?

Andrew Murrison Portrait Dr Murrison
- Hansard - -

The right hon. and learned Gentleman is right to raise the concerns of the Baltic states, which are nervous at the moment. Of course, they are covered by article 5, so they have a particular relationship with NATO that is not enjoyed by Ukraine.