All 4 Debates between Andrew Mitchell and Lord Johnson of Marylebone

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Mitchell and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Wednesday 30th March 2011

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Morris Portrait David Morris (Morecambe and Lunesdale) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

11. What recent assessment he has made of the humanitarian situation on Libya’s borders with Tunisia and Egypt.

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson (Orpington) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. What recent assessment he has made of the humanitarian situation on Libya’s borders with Tunisia and Egypt.

Andrew Mitchell Portrait The Secretary of State for International Development (Mr Andrew Mitchell)
- Hansard - -

More than 350,000 people have crossed the Libyan borders since the crisis began. Early action by Britain and others has ensured that a logistical crisis has not, so far at least, developed into a humanitarian emergency.

Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is entirely correct. Britain was one of the first countries to provide blankets and tents for those who were caught out in the open on the borders. Following that, as I said in answer to the previous question, we were at the forefront of the international community in providing flights to repatriate migrant workers from both borders.

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

One of the biggest challenges facing Egypt’s transition to democracy is the fragile state of its economy, with capital rapidly leaving the country. Can the Secretary of State please say what he will do to stop the additional pressure on the Egyptian economy from the influx of refugees from Libya, which is draining it of remittances and pushing up already high unemployment?

Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is right to identify a most important issue. I have made clear Britain’s significant contribution to ensuring that migrants are flown home. On the other points that he mentioned, some of that is a matter for the Paris Club of creditors, the other international financial institutions and the significant funding available from the European Union through the neighbourhood funds.

Aid Reviews

Debate between Andrew Mitchell and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Tuesday 1st March 2011

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

I think that I was respectful rather than charming about Mrs Bachelet, but as soon as we have a plan that we can fund, we will fund it. We have already provided some transitional funds. As the hon. Lady will know, there is specific funding to tackle violence against women, and she can rest assured that the Government strongly support this agency, as we always have. When we see the plan, we will fund it.

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson (Orpington) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the tighter focus of the aid programme, but the India programme continues to present a juicy target for aid sceptics who criticise it for being directed at a nuclear power and a space power. Does the Secretary of State agree that it would be fairer for them to acknowledge that the civil nuclear programme is playing an essential part in meeting India’s energy deficit, and that since its inception the space programme has focused largely on development, using satellite technology to give Indians in rural areas access to long-distance learning opportunities, remote health care and crop-related weather analysis?

Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend makes an extremely good point. India presents a paradox, because although it has the programmes to which he refers, there are also more poor people in India than in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa. Our programme is in transition: we are shifting its focus on to only three of the poorest states in India, and over the next four years up to half the programme will be spent on pro-poor private sector investment for development. We will not be there for ever, but now is not the time to end this programme.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Mitchell and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Wednesday 17th November 2010

(14 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

My right hon. Friend raised the matter not only in private but specifically at the table. He pointed out that it was hard to expect leaders in the developing world to stand by their commitments to their people if leaders in the G8 and others did not stand by the commitments that they had solemnly made at Gleneagles and beyond on the importance of increasing our support for the poorest in the world.

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson (Orpington) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

12. What recent assessment he has made of the value for money of his Department’s aid delivered through the UN Relief and Works Agency.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Mitchell and Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Wednesday 13th October 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Mitchell Portrait The Secretary of State for International Development (Mr Andrew Mitchell)
- Hansard - -

We are moving from a focus on inputs to a focus on outputs and outcomes—the results our money actually achieves. We will gain maximum value for money for every pound we spend through greater transparency, rigorous independent evaluation and an unremitting focus on results.

Lord Johnson of Marylebone Portrait Joseph Johnson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the Secretary of State say what assessment he has made of value for money from the more than £2 billion that the Department has given to the International Development Association over the three years ending June 2011, indicating whether he intends to match past commitments in the next funding period—that is, the 16th replenishment of the IDA?

Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend raises an important point about the next replenishment of the World Bank IDA funds. As I mentioned in answer to the last question, the multilateral aid review will be the body that looks at value for money. At the last replenishment—IDA15—as anyone who follows these things closely knows, Britain was the biggest contributor and that contribution was £2 billion. What I what from the next replenishment is for people to know to what extent we are getting clean water, sanitation, basic education and health care to the people at the end of the track, who do not have them in our world today.