Information between 13th October 2026 - 23rd October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 105 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 107 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108 |
|
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Andrew Mitchell voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Andrew Mitchell speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill
Andrew Mitchell contributed 1 speech (770 words) Report stage Tuesday 13th October 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Public Houses: Sutton Coldfield
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield) Thursday 22nd October 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent steps his Department has taken to support pubs in Royal Sutton Coldfield. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (Cabinet Office) (Jointly with HM Treasury) The Government recognises the important contribution that pubs make to local communities, including in Royal Sutton Coldfield. The Government has taken steps to support the sector with eligible pubs benefiting from a 15 per cent business rates reduction from April 2026, followed by a further 20 per cent reduction for pubs, social clubs and qualifying live music venues from April 2027. Taken together, these measures are expected to save the typical pub around £3,100 in 2027-28. We have also doubled the Hospitality Support Fund to £10m which will help rural pubs to diversify and ensure they can continue to be vital community hubs. We have also ended upward-only rent review clauses and new Community Right to Buy legislation will strengthen powers for local people to buy assets like hospitality venues and pubs before they are lost – keeping them in the hands of the community. |
|
Bank Services: Post Offices
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the role Post Office branches can play in maintaining access to (a) face-to-face banking services and (b) cash in Royal Sutton Coldfield. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government recognises the importance of access to cash and banking services for individuals and businesses, including in Royal Sutton Coldfield. Cash continues to be used by millions of people across the UK, and the Government is committed to protecting access to cash for individuals and businesses. The Government is also committed to ensuring that people who need in-person banking can continue to access essential services. That is why the Government commissioned an independent Review into Access to Banking Services, to assess whether changes to access to in-person banking services are causing consumer detriment, the scale of any detriment, and who it affects, including the digitally excluded. The Review will consider access to in-person banking services for both personal and business customers. Alongside the Review, the Government intends to use the Financial Services and Markets Bill to introduce a power to allow action to be taken in future to protect access to banking services, should the evidence support intervention. |
|
Paramedical Staff: West Midlands
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps she is taking to increase the (a) recruitment and (b) retention of paramedics in the West Midlands. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) I refer the Rt. Hon. Member to the answer provided on 16 July in response to Question 16343. |
|
Extracurricular Activities: Primary Education
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to improve the number of extracurricular activities offered to pupils in state primary schools. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The department has published a new Enrichment Framework with benchmarks to provide a clear, simple structure against which schools and colleges can evaluate their own provision and make considered improvements to their offer. It is supported by five Enrichment Ambassadors and the £22.5 million Enrichment Expansion Programme, which will work with over 400 schools in the most deprived areas of England to help them meet the framework's benchmarks. This sits alongside wider government programmes, including PE and School Sport Partnerships, the National Centre for Arts Education, National Education Nature Parks, the Cadet Expansion Programme, Erasmus+ and Building Equal Access to Chess in Schools and free enrichment offers through the Free Breakfast Club programme from the LEGO® Group and Youth Sport Trust, in partnership with Sports Directory. In addition, the Every Child Can programme will invest £132.5 million of dormant assets funding in new enrichment activities through schools, community programmes, weekend activities and holiday provision. |
|
Unemployment: Young People
Asked by: Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps he is taking to tackle the causes of youth unemployment in Royal Sutton Coldfield. Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) With around one million young people not in education, employment and training, this Government will not leave an entire generation of young people behind. The government is investing an additional £2.5 billion by 2029 into the Youth Guarantee and the Growth and Skills Levy, supporting almost one million young people and creating up to 500,000 opportunities to earn and learn.
Young people in Royal Sutton Coldfield will benefit from the full breadth of Youth Guarantee support, such as an expanded network of Youth Hubs, earlier intensive support in Jobcentres through a new Youth Guarantee Gateway, additional work experience and training opportunities, a £3,000 Youth Jobs Grant and £2,000 apprenticeship hiring payment for employers, and a fully funded six-month job for long-term unemployed 18–24-year-olds.
We also recognise the crisis of participation that Alan Milburn has so clearly laid out in his interim report. We will use this interim report to continue to build our reforms and look forward to the final recommendations in the Autumn. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
12th October 2026
Andrew Mitchell (Conservative - Sutton Coldfield) 4. Visits outside the UK International visit to United Arab Emirates between 06 September 2026 and 08 September 2026 Source |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Oct 2026, 5:25 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Andrew Mitchell thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I want to draw the House's attention to a new clause 22, which I have tabled together " Jess Phillips MP (Birmingham Yardley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Oct 2026, 5:25 p.m. - House of Commons ">> The order, sir. >> Andrew Mitchell thank you, Madam " Jess Phillips MP (Birmingham Yardley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Courts and Tribunals Bill
108 speeches (31,395 words) Report stage Tuesday 13th October 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Caroline Nokes (Con - Romsey and Southampton North) I call Sir Andrew Mitchell. - Link to Speech 2: Jess Phillips (Lab - Birmingham Yardley) Member for the royal town of Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell), left off; I am from the royal town - Link to Speech 3: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) Member for Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell) will be aware—as my hon. - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Monday 12th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for International Development International Agreements Committee Found: Sir Andrew Mitchell: Thank you very much, Chair. |