Debates between Andrew Mitchell and Dan Poulter during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Mitchell and Dan Poulter
Wednesday 26th October 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

First, I welcome the hon. Gentleman to his new position. He has emerged from six and a half years in the Whips Office, so it is a relief for everyone to hear that he can still speak.

The hon. Gentleman rightly makes it clear that the importance of tackling conflict should be at the heart of development policy. Of all the 28 countries with which we have a bilateral programme, about three quarters are directly engaged in or have recently come out of conflict. That is an important aspect of everything that we do.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Daniel Poulter (Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

5. What steps his Department is taking to assist countries in the Caribbean to develop greener economies.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Andrew Mitchell and Dan Poulter
Wednesday 17th November 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Daniel Poulter (Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

3. What funding his Department provides to British charities with international developmental goals operating overseas.

Andrew Mitchell Portrait The Secretary of State for International Development (Mr Andrew Mitchell)
- Hansard - -

In 2009-10, the Department for International Development provided £362 million to UK charities and civil society organisations to assist in poverty reduction overseas. The global poverty action fund, which will increasingly shape partnership with charities and non-governmental organisations, was launched on 27 October.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure that the Secretary of State would agree that we need to get funding to the right place. On improving women’s health overseas, does he agree that the focus should be on making interventions in the right place, which is during delivery and childbirth, which account for over 50% of deaths among women? That is where we should be focusing our resources when we fund overseas aid.

Andrew Mitchell Portrait Mr Mitchell
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Reproductive, maternal and newborn health care is the subject of a business plan discussion that is under way. With his expertise, I very much hope that he will contribute to our thinking on that. The plan will be published in January. As he said, we need to focus on the continuum of care, up to birth and beyond. We are quite clear about the importance of the issue, but he will know that placing women’s choice over whether and when they have children is at the heart of all the overseas programmes that we run.