Information between 6th April 2026 - 16th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alison Griffiths voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Alison Griffiths speeches from: Pension Schemes Bill
Alison Griffiths contributed 1 speech (523 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Wednesday 15th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Visitor Levy
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact on non-mayoral visitor economies, including Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, of limiting powers to introduce an overnight visitor levy in England to Mayoral Strategic Authorities and any future Foundation Strategic Authorities. Answered by Miatta Fahnbulleh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) West Sussex is a constituent member of the Sussex and Brighton Combined County Authority, which was formally established on 25 March 2026. Consequently, the towns of Bognor Regis and Littlehampton will benefit from a Mayoral Strategic Authority (MSA) for the region with the power to introduce an Overnight Visitor Levy (OVL). As set out in the Visitor Levy consultation document, the Government believes this power best sits with MSAs as Mayors hold the levers to drive local growth and have the mandate to make strategic decisions over a large geography. Evidence from other countries suggests that modest levies have a limited impact on visitor numbers and displacement.
In February, the Government invited all local authorities that do not currently have a devolution agreement to come forward with proposals for a Foundation Strategic Authority (FSA) across a sensible geography to ensure everywhere has access to the benefits of devolution. As you note, the Government has also consulted on whether to give the Visitor Levy power to FSAs, given they also hold levers to drive local growth and have strategic roles in economic development over a significant geographic area. The Government will publish the response to the consultation which ended on 18 February shortly |
|
Visitor Levy
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate her Department has made of the annual administrative and compliance costs of an overnight visitor levy in England for small and independent accommodation providers, including guesthouses, bed and breakfasts, campsites, self-catering properties and short-term lets. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.
The Government recognises the important role our rural and coastal communities play in supporting the visitor economy. At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.
The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment. |
|
Visitor Levy
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what comparative assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of an overnight visitor levy in England on (a) coastal visitor economies with shorter average stays and lower average visitor spend and (b) major urban destinations. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.
The Government recognises the important role our rural and coastal communities play in supporting the visitor economy. At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.
The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment. |
|
Visitor Levy
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of a overnight visitor levy in England on levels of visitor spend in local high streets, hospitality businesses, and attractions in levy areas. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.
The Government recognises the important role our rural and coastal communities play in supporting the visitor economy. At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.
The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment. |
|
Visitor Levy
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of an overnight visitor levy in England on levels of displacement of overnight stays in levy areas to nearby non-levy areas; and whether she has modelled the potential impact of such displacement on coastal and seasonal visitor economies. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government has announced powers for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy on short-term overnight accommodation in their region, to drive economic growth, including through support for the local visitor economy.
The Government recognises the important role our rural and coastal communities play in supporting the visitor economy. At Budget, the Government published a consultation so that the public, businesses, and local government could shape the design of these powers, including options to minimise the burden on businesses and communities. This consultation closed on the 18th of February and the Government will publish a response in due course.
The precise design and scope of the power for Mayors to introduce a visitor levy is still under development, and the impacts of the levy will largely be determined by local decisions. Mayors will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, consult on specific proposals. We expect Mayors to engage constructively with businesses and their communities to hear any concerns. Following consultation, we expect Mayors to publish a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus, and an impact assessment. |
|
Sports: Business Rates
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether his Department plans to issue guidance to billing authorities on the publication of aggregate and recipient-level information on discretionary business rates relief awarded to premises used wholly or mainly for community sport. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Billing authorities report on the value of discretionary relief provided to Community Amateur Sports Clubs and a snapshot of the number of hereditaments in receipt of this discretionary relief via the Department’s national non-domestic rates forms. Guidance to help complete the forms is provided to billing authorities.
The latest published information on the value of the relief in 2026-27 can be found at table 2 here.
The latest published data on the number of hereditaments in receipt of discretionary relief as at 31 December 2024 can be found in Table 4 here.
Data on hereditaments as at 31 December 2025 will be published in due course. |
|
Sports: Business Rates
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential effect of delays in determining discretionary business rates relief applications on the financial sustainability of grassroots sports clubs in England. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The administration of business rates, including billing, enforcement and decisions on the award of relief is the responsibility of local government, having regard to the relevant legislation or, where applicable, guidance published by central government.
Local authorities are responsible for deciding any application process for the locally funded discretionary rate relief schemes they administer. |
|
Sports: Business Rates
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether his Department has made an assessment of the administrative burden placed on volunteer-led sports clubs and community sports facilities by annual reapplication requirements for discretionary business rates relief. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The administration of business rates, including billing, enforcement and decisions on the award of relief is the responsibility of local government, having regard to the relevant legislation or, where applicable, guidance published by central government.
Local authorities are responsible for deciding any application process for the locally funded discretionary rate relief schemes they administer. |
|
Sports: Business Rates
Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of local authority budget pressures on decisions to award discretionary business rates relief to sports clubs and community sports facilities. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The administration of business rates, including billing, enforcement and decisions on the award of relief is the responsibility of local government, having regard to the relevant legislation or, where applicable, guidance published by central government.
Local authorities are responsible for deciding any application process for the locally funded discretionary rate relief schemes they administer. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
15 Apr 2026, 3:04 p.m. - House of Commons " Alison Griffiths. " Alison Griffiths MP (Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Pension Schemes Bill
74 speeches (13,195 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Wednesday 15th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: Torsten Bell (Lab - Swansea West) Member for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton (Alison Griffiths) did not quite touch on. - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 2 p.m. Business and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Artificial Intelligence, business and the future of the workforce At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Neil Lawrence - DeepMind Professor of Machine Learning at University of Cambridge Wendy Hall - Director, Web Science Institute at University of Southampton At 3:10pm: Oral evidence Hugh Milward - UK Vice President of Corporate Affairs at Microsoft Clinton Hasell - Chief Business Officer at Kao Data Matthew Evans - Chief Operating Officer & Director of Markets at techUK At 3:50pm: Oral evidence Karim Palant - Director of External Affairs at UK Private Capital Phill Robinson - Founder at Boardwave Simon Menashy - Partner and AI Specialist at MMC Ventures View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 2 p.m. Business and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: China and the UK economy At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Rain Newton-Smith - Chief Executive at Confederation of British Industry (CBI) Peter Burnett OBE - Chief Executive at China-Britain Business Council At 3:10pm: Oral evidence James Brougham - Senior Economist at Make UK Shaun Grady - Chair at AstraZeneca UK Julian Scriven - Managing Director of Bike Hire at Brompton Bicycle At 3:50pm: Oral evidence Miles Celic - Chief Executive Officer at TheCityUK Professor Sir Peter Mathieson - Principal and Vice-Chancellor at University of Edinburgh Sabina Ciofu - International Policy and Strategy Lead at techUK View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Air Pollution in England At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Sir Stephen Holgate CBE - Professor of Immunopharmacology at The University of Southampton Professor Roy Harrison - Queen Elizabeth II Centenary Professor of Environmental Health at University of Birmingham Professor Anna Hansell - Professor of Environmental Epidemiology at University of Leicester At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Mark Sutton - Environmental Physicist at UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Ms Jenny Hawley - Policy and Advocacy Manager at Plantlife View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 3:30 p.m. Business and Trade Sub-Committee on Economic Security, Arms and Export Controls - Oral evidence Subject: Critical minerals At 3:45pm: Oral evidence Jeff Townsend - Founder at Critical Minerals Association Dr Gavin Mudd - Director at UK Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre Dr Kathryn Goodenough - International Lead (Regional Geoscience) at British Geological Survey At 4:25pm: Oral evidence Caspar Rawles - Chief Operating Officer at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence Martin Freer - Chief Executive Officer at The Faraday Institution Pranesh Narayanan - Senior Research Fellow at The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) At 5:05pm: Oral evidence James Kynge - Senior Research Fellow for China and the World at Chatham House Tom Baxter - Project Manager at Dialogue Earth Dr Kathryn Moore - Associate Professor in Critical and Green Technology Metals at University of Exeter View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 2 p.m. Business and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Industrial Strategy At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Arjan Geveke - Director at Energy Intensive Users Group Rick Jennings - Group Energy Manager at Tata Chemicals Europe Group Adam Berman - Director of Policy & Advocacy at Energy UK David Whitehouse - Chief Executive at Offshore Energies UK At 3:10pm: Oral evidence Murray Paul - Director of External Affairs at Jaguar Land Rover Matthew Ogg - Director of Policy at Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders Lisa Brankin - Chair and Managing Director at Ford of Britain and Ireland At 3:50pm: Oral evidence Dame Clare Barclay DBE - Chair at Industrial Strategy Advisory Council, and President of Enterprise and Industry, Europe the Middle East and Africa at Microsoft Rt Hon Greg Clark - Member at Industrial Strategy Advisory Council, and Executive Chair at University of Warwick Innovation District Kate Bell - Member at Industrial Strategy Advisory Council, and Assistant General Secretary at Trades Union Congress Leonie Lambert - Director, Industrial Strategy Council Secretariat at Department for Business and Trade View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
8 Apr 2026
UK trade with the EU Business and Trade Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 18 May 2026) At a Joint Summit in May 2025, the UK and EU agreed to a Security and Defence Partnership, and published a “Common Understanding”, setting out shared commitments to deepen cooperation. Progress since that initial summit has been limited, with core areas for agreement still to conclude. The Business and Trade Committee therefore wishes to assess the delivery and expected benefits of the Government’s EU reset to date, and to examine whether the current approach is the right model to achieve the UK’s aims. |
|
8 Apr 2026
UK trade with the US Business and Trade Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 18 May 2026) The Business and Trade Committee is conducting its bi-annual stock take on the UK-US economic and trade agreements, building on its baseline report US Economic Prosperity Deal (HC 1306, 2024–26). Since that report, the Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD) framework has been extended through a Technology Prosperity Deal (TPD) and an agreement on pharmaceutical tariffs. The Committee invites evidence on what has been delivered, and the priorities for future UK-US collaboration. |
|
17 Apr 2026
HM Treasury and the economics of climate and nature Environmental Audit Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 21 May 2026) The Environmental Audit Committee is examining the role of HM Treasury in shaping the UK’s response to climate change, nature loss and wider environmental sustainability. The Government’s economic policy objective includes a commitment to “accelerate the transition to a climate resilient, nature positive and net zero economy”.[1] This inquiry will explore how HM Treasury influences the Government’s approach to climate change, nature loss and environmental sustainability through economic policy, appraisal frameworks and funding decisions. It will also assess the extent to which these objectives are reflected in practice, including whether climate, nature and environmental sustainability are recognised as contributors to long term growth and resilience. In addition, the inquiry will consider how effectively climate and environment related risks and opportunities are assessed within economic and fiscal decisions, and what impact HM Treasury has in addressing them. [1] Remit for the Monetary Policy Committee Read the call for evidence for more information about this inquiry, and to find out how to submit written evidence through the Committee's online evidence submission portal. |