Alex Mayer Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Alex Mayer

Information between 2nd September 2026 - 2nd October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Wednesday 9th September 2026 11 a.m.
Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)

Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall
Subject: Standards for bus stops
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th October 2026 9:30 a.m.
Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)

Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall
Subject: Future of the UK coach industry
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 427
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 346
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 317
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 190 Labour Aye votes vs 153 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Alex Mayer voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 209 Labour Aye votes vs 115 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 218


Speeches
Alex Mayer speeches from: Select Committee Chairs: Period of Leave
Alex Mayer contributed 1 speech (63 words)
Monday 14th September 2026 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House
Alex Mayer speeches from: Bus Stops
Alex Mayer contributed 4 speeches (2,287 words)
Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Transport
Alex Mayer speeches from: Vaccination Rates: England
Alex Mayer contributed 1 speech (391 words)
Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Poultry: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Thursday 3rd September 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the implications for her policies of the report Sustainable Alternatives to Culled Chicks as Captive Raptor and Reptile Feed published by the Vegetarian Society UK on 4 June 2026.

Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

This Government will consider the Vegetarian Society UK’s report on alternative feed sources for raptors and reptiles as part of its work to work towards seeing an end the practice of culling male laying hen chicks.

Bus Services
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 7th September 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate she has made of the size of the UK coach fleet.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

There is no official estimate of the current coach fleet size. The Confederation of Passenger Transport published a report in 2020 which estimated that the UK coach fleet comprised around 27,500 vehicles.

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research: Finance
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Tuesday 8th September 2026

Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, how much funding was provided to the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) each year between 2020-2025; and what proportion of that funding was spent on activities intended to replace the use of animals in scientific procedures (as opposed to activities focused on refinement or reduction).

Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The NC3Rs receives funding from a number of sources. Its core funding is provided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) which are part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).

Core funding for financial years:

2020/21: £9.35M

2021/22: £9.45M

2022/23: £10.20M

2023/24: £10.00M

2024/25: £10.10M

2025/26: £7.93M

Replacement of the use of animals is included in all NC3Rs programmes with the exception of its animal welfare projects. Between 2020/21 and 2024/25, more than 80% of grants awarded by the NC3Rs have been to replace the use of animals.

Floods
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Tuesday 8th September 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of prolonged periods of dry weather on the risk of surface water flooding when heavy rainfall occurs; and what steps she is taking to help prepare for that risk.

Answered by Emma Hardy - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

Defra keeps flood risks under continual review. The dry conditions of recent months have meant the ground is hard and compacted across the country, increasing the risk of localised surface water flooding in all areas following heavy rain or thunderstorms.

The Government is supporting improved surface water flood forecasting and risk mapping. The daily Flood Guidance Statement, produced by the Environment Agency and Met Office, provides regular assessments of the risk of surface water flooding. This helps lead local flood authorities, who manage local flood risks from surface water.

Defibrillators: Batteries
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 7th September 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has made an assessment of the adequacy of the availability of replacement batteries for defibrillators.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Department has arrangements in place to help ensure the continuity of the supply of medical products, such as replacement batteries for defibrillators, including the National Supply Disruption Response service, which – in the event of a supply issue – can work with the medical supply industry, the health and care system, and our system partners to help minimise any impact on the provision of care.

Research: Finance
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 7th September 2026

Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what estimate his Department has made of the total amount of public funding allocated to the development, validation and uptake of human-specific research methods each year between 2020-2025.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) invests in a range of human-specific research that does not rely on animal studies. Many studies developing and using human-specific and alternative methods are classified as basic research, so any funding values given would be an underestimate. Examples include the Medical Research Council’s Experimental Medicine programme, a £15 million UKRI, NC3Rs and Wellcome funding call for novel human in vitro models of complex disease, and an £18 million Experimental Medicine funding call on neurodegeneration. Between 2020 and 2025, UKRI also invested approximately £10 million annually in the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.

Railways: Bridges
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Tuesday 8th September 2026

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will provide the total number and the total value of successful claims by Network Rail to claim back from hauliers costs incurred by bridge strikes.

Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Network Rail's bridge strike data does not record whether an incident was caused by a haulier, bus operator or other heavy goods vehicle. Since the start of Control Period 7 (1 April 2024), Network Rail has recovered £16.28 million in costs arising from bridge strikes. During this period, Network Rail has pursued 3,162 recovery claims, of which 822 resulted in a financial recovery.

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: Public Appointments
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Tuesday 15th September 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will list the professions of the members on DEFRA’s Infrastructure Board.

Answered by Jenny Riddell-Carpenter - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Defra Infrastructure Board is an internal cross-government forum, with representation from a range of government departments and public bodies. It draws on expertise from across government, with relevant technical experts attending as required.

Pensions: Tax Allowances
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Tuesday 15th September 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many people in each constituency in the East of England have been identified by HMRC as being owed pension tax relief as a result of not receiving the full tax relief available on pension contributions.

Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General

HMRC do not hold information on owed pension tax relief by constituency.

Tree Planting: Urban Areas
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Wednesday 16th September 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether her Department plans to introduce a national minimum urban tree canopy cover target for local authorities.

Answered by Jenny Riddell-Carpenter - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Government is committed to meeting the statutory Environment Act target to increase tree canopy and woodland cover in England to at least 16.5% by 2050. We continue to support local authorities and partners to increase tree cover, including in towns and cities, through a range of tree planting and establishment programmes.

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research: Finance
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Wednesday 16th September 2026

Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, how much funding was provided to the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research in each year from 2020 to 2025; and what proportion of that funding was allocated to replacing the use of animals in scientific procedures.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 08 September 2026 to Question UIN 23681 Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament

Animal Experiments
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Thursday 17th September 2026

Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what estimate his Department has made of the amount of public funding allocated to the development, validation and uptake of human-specific research methods in each year from 2020 to 2025.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 28 August 2026 to Question UIN 23680 Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament

Football: Broadcasting
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Friday 18th September 2026

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the impact of the rule that prohibits UK television broadcasters from showing live Premier League matches on Saturdays between 2:45pm and 5:15pm on (a) attendance of non premier league football games and (b) pirating of Premier League matches.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

Article 48 of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) Statutes, which facilitates the “3pm blackout” is voluntarily adopted by the Football Association (the FA) with the aim of protecting ticket sales for lower leagues in the football pyramid.

As the Minister stated on the floor of the House of Commons during Second Reading of the Sporting Events Bill on 3 September, this is “an issue for the Football Association, but we support the current situation, as we recognise the importance of this for the lower leagues'".

Heat Pumps
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Friday 18th September 2026

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether her Department is taking steps to support the approval of air-to-air heat pumps for inclusion in the Boiler Upgrade Scheme.

Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Government is taking steps to support the inclusion of air-to-air heat pumps in the Boiler Upgrade Scheme. The necessary legislative changes have already been made and the scheme is ready to provide £2,500 grants for eligible installations.

It is also necessary to ensure that there are standards in place and installers are accredited to install air-to-air heat pumps. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero is working closely with the United Kingdom Accreditation Service, the Microgeneration Certification Scheme and Certification Bodies to deliver these.

Animal Experiments: Primates
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 21st September 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to address the 38 per cent increase in non-human primates bred in Africa and used for the first time in scientific procedures in the UK in 2025.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Government is committed to ensuring that non-human primates used in scientific procedures are sourced responsibly and used only where no suitable alternative is available. In 2025, 1,845 non-human primates were used for the first time in scientific procedures in Great Britain. All marmosets, tamarins and rhesus monkeys were born at licensed establishments in the UK, while the majority of cynomolgus monkeys were born overseas, but were not sourced from the wild.

Following advice from the Animals in Science Committee, the Home Office strengthened its sourcing requirements from 1 August 2025 so that non-human primates should come from established captive-breeding populations rather than being sourced from the wild. These requirements are supported by a time-limited transitional arrangement and a commitment to review their operation.

The Government supports the use of UK-bred non-human primates where suitable animals are available. However, sourcing decisions must take account of scientific requirements, animal welfare, biosecurity and the availability of appropriate breeding populations. The Home Office will continue to monitor sourcing data and the effect of the strengthened requirements.

The Government is also investing £75 million through its strategy to support the development, validation and uptake of alternatives to animal use.

Animal Experiments: Primates
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 21st September 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to reduce the use of non-human primates in scientific procedures.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Government is committed to ensuring that non-human primates used in scientific procedures are sourced responsibly and used only where no suitable alternative is available. In 2025, 1,845 non-human primates were used for the first time in scientific procedures in Great Britain. All marmosets, tamarins and rhesus monkeys were born at licensed establishments in the UK, while the majority of cynomolgus monkeys were born overseas, but were not sourced from the wild.

Following advice from the Animals in Science Committee, the Home Office strengthened its sourcing requirements from 1 August 2025 so that non-human primates should come from established captive-breeding populations rather than being sourced from the wild. These requirements are supported by a time-limited transitional arrangement and a commitment to review their operation.

The Government supports the use of UK-bred non-human primates where suitable animals are available. However, sourcing decisions must take account of scientific requirements, animal welfare, biosecurity and the availability of appropriate breeding populations. The Home Office will continue to monitor sourcing data and the effect of the strengthened requirements.

The Government is also investing £75 million through its strategy to support the development, validation and uptake of alternatives to animal use.

Animal Experiments: Primates
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 21st September 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps her Department is taking to increase the proportion of non-human primates used in scientific procedures that are bred in the UK.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Government is committed to ensuring that non-human primates used in scientific procedures are sourced responsibly and used only where no suitable alternative is available. In 2025, 1,845 non-human primates were used for the first time in scientific procedures in Great Britain. All marmosets, tamarins and rhesus monkeys were born at licensed establishments in the UK, while the majority of cynomolgus monkeys were born overseas, but were not sourced from the wild.

Following advice from the Animals in Science Committee, the Home Office strengthened its sourcing requirements from 1 August 2025 so that non-human primates should come from established captive-breeding populations rather than being sourced from the wild. These requirements are supported by a time-limited transitional arrangement and a commitment to review their operation.

The Government supports the use of UK-bred non-human primates where suitable animals are available. However, sourcing decisions must take account of scientific requirements, animal welfare, biosecurity and the availability of appropriate breeding populations. The Home Office will continue to monitor sourcing data and the effect of the strengthened requirements.

The Government is also investing £75 million through its strategy to support the development, validation and uptake of alternatives to animal use.

Animal Experiments
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Monday 21st September 2026

Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to reduce the use of animals in scientific procedures undertaken to meet regulatory requirements outside the UK and EU.

Answered by Chris McDonald - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

We are supporting the development, validation and international acceptance of alternative methods, including through the forthcoming UK Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (UKCVAM), engagement with international regulators and participation in OECD test guideline programmes. We are also strengthening bilateral and multilateral partnerships to support the global uptake of validated alternatives, helping to reduce reliance on animal testing while maintaining high standards of human, animal and environmental safety.

Animal Experiments
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Thursday 10th September 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to the Annual statistics of scientific procedures on living animals, Great Britain 2025, published in July 2026, what assessment she has made of the use of 11,213 mice in procedures reported under the LD50 and LC50 test.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

All procedures using protected animals, including the LD50 and LC50 tests, are subject to strict regulation under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA). No project licence can be granted unless a Home Office inspector has completed a harm-benefit analysis and concluded that the likely benefits justify the harms to the animals.

As part of that assessment, inspectors consider the scientific rationale, whether the proposed method is appropriate to achieve the stated benefits, and whether suitable non-animal alternatives are available. The use of animals is authorised only where those tests are judged necessary, justified and proportionate.

Fires: East of England
Asked by: Alex Mayer (Labour - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard)
Wednesday 9th September 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps she is taking to support fire services across the East of England to tackle wildfires.

Answered by Florence Eshalomi - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Fire and rescue services have been responding to an exceptionally challenging period of wildfire activity, with multiple significant incidents being managed simultaneously across England and Wales.

Measures have already been utilised to assist with the response to emergencies such as the ban on the disposable BBQs introduced on 14 August as well as use of the emergency alert system across the East of England and other parts of the UK. These are options that will assist emergency services going forward.

This year, we have made available almost £1.95 billion in core spending power to standalone fire and rescue authorities in England (excluding York & North Yorkshire and Greater Manchester) through the Local Government Finance Settlement. It is for each fire and rescue authority to decide how best to use that funding, including for wildfire training, preparation and prevention, based on local risk.




Alex Mayer mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Bus Stops
15 speeches (4,593 words)
Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Transport
Mentions:
1: Alec Shelbrooke (Con - Wetherby and Easingwold) I will call Alex Mayer to move the motion and then the Minister to respond. - Link to Speech
2: Julia Buckley (Lab - Shrewsbury) Friend the Member for Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard (Alex Mayer) on the securing the first of two stimulating - Link to Speech
3: Justin Madders (Lab - Ellesmere Port and Bromborough) Friend the Member for Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard (Alex Mayer) for securing her first Westminster - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Thursday 24th September 2026
Minutes and decisions - Summary of Committee’s meeting on 8 September 2026

Modernisation Committee

Found: of Committee’s meeting on 8 September 2026 The Committee met in private and heard ideas from Alex Mayer

Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - London Borough of Hillingdon, Heathrow Strategic Planning Group, Heathrow Strategic Planning Group, and National Infrastructure Planning Association

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee

Found: present: Ruth Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Jacob Collier; Daniel Francis; Alex Mayer

Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Heathrow Area Transport Forum, Transport for London, National Highways, and Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee

Found: present: Ruth Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Jacob Collier; Daniel Francis; Alex Mayer

Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - University of Leicester, The University of York, and City St George's University of London

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee

Found: Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Jacob Collier; Daniel Francis; Olly Glover; Alex Mayer

Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Possible, The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Manchester, and Aviation Environment Federation

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee

Found: Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Jacob Collier; Daniel Francis; Olly Glover; Alex Mayer

Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Oral Evidence - GMB London Region, BusinessLDN, and British Chambers of Commerce

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee

Found: Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Jacob Collier; Daniel Francis; Olly Glover; Alex Mayer

Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Oral Evidence - New Economics Foundation, Peak Economics, Department for Transport, and Frontier Economics

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee

Found: Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Jacob Collier; Daniel Francis; Olly Glover; Alex Mayer




Alex Mayer - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 15th September 2026 3:30 p.m.
Transport Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement
At 4:00pm: Oral evidence
Anthony Smith - Independent Chair at Heathrow Area Transport Forum
Alex Williams - Chief Customer and Strategy Officer at Transport for London
Elliot Shaw - Chief Customer and Strategy Officer at National Highways
Steven Costello - Director at Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd
At 5:00pm: Oral evidence
Ian Thynne - Head of Environmental Specialists at London Borough of Hillingdon
Mr Mark Frost - Associate Director at Heathrow Strategic Planning Group
Michael Coughlin - Strategic Advisor at Heathrow Strategic Planning Group
Anna Sutherland Bamber - Council Member at National Infrastructure Planning Association
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 20th October 2026 2 p.m.
Sporting Events Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 22nd October 2026 2 p.m.
Sporting Events Bill - Debate
Subject: Further to consider the Bill
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 13th October 2026 3:30 p.m.
Transport Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement
At 4:00pm: Oral evidence
Mr Christian Hughes - Chairman at Longford Residents Association
Deborah Petty - Member at Molesey Residents Association
Mike Fawcett - Member at Putney Society
Mr Parmjit Dhanda - Executive Director at Back Heathrow
Stewart Pomeroy - Member at Colne Valley Regional Park Trust
At 5:00pm: Oral evidence
Professor Piers Forster CBE - Member at Climate Change Committee
Dr James Richardson - Chief Analyst at Climate Change Committee
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 14th October 2026 9:15 a.m.
Transport Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement
At 9:15am: Oral evidence
Surinder Arora - Chairman at Heathrow West Limited (HWL)
Mr Carlton Brown - Chief Executive at Heathrow West Limited (HWL)
Scott Witchalls - Director, Transport and Infrastructure at Stantec UK
At 10:15am: Oral evidence
Thomas Woldbye - Chief Executive at Heathrow Airport Limited
Helen Elsby - Chief Development Officer at Heathrow Airport Limited
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 20th October 2026 4 p.m.
Transport Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 21st October 2026 9:15 a.m.
Transport Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement
At 9:15am: Oral evidence
Keir Mather MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Minister for Aviation at Department for Transport
Hannah Newell - Director for Heathrow Expansion at Department for Transport
Martin Gilmour - Deputy Director for Heathrow Expansion at Department for Transport
Tim Johnson - Interim Executive Director for Consumers, Markets, and Communications at Civil Aviation Authority
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Oral Evidence - New Economics Foundation, Peak Economics, Department for Transport, and Frontier Economics

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Oral Evidence - GMB London Region, BusinessLDN, and British Chambers of Commerce

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 9th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Edinburgh Airport, and Airports UK

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 9th September 2026
Oral Evidence - International Airlines Group, easyJet, Logistics UK, Airline Operators Committee, and Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Possible, The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Manchester, and Aviation Environment Federation

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - University of Leicester, The University of York, and City St George's University of London

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 9th September 2026
Correspondence - Letter to the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to pre-appointment hearing for Chair of Passenger Watchdog, dated 3 September 2026

Transport Committee
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - London Borough of Hillingdon, Heathrow Strategic Planning Group, Heathrow Strategic Planning Group, and National Infrastructure Planning Association

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Heathrow Area Transport Forum, Transport for London, National Highways, and Heathrow Southern Railway Ltd

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 16th September 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to the introduction of the Highways (Financing) Bill, dated 10 September 2026

Transport Committee
Wednesday 16th September 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to the Railways Bill: publication of supporting products, dated 9 September 2026

Transport Committee
Wednesday 16th September 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport relating to 2040 rail freight growth target, dated 8 September 2026

Transport Committee
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Written Evidence - Harmondsworth and Sipson Residents Association
HEN0076 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Frontier Economics
HEN0077 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Airline Operators Committee
HEN0078 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Peter Hughes
HEN0079 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Heathrow Area Transport Forum
HEN0086 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Heathrow Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise
HEN0087 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Paul McGuinness
HEN0080 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - London Borough of Hillingdon
HEN0082 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Department for Transport
HEN0088 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Heathrow Strategic Planning Group
HEN0084 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Regional and Business Airports Group
HEN0081 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - International Airlines Group
HEN0085 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Written Evidence - Peak Economics
HEN0083 - Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Correspondence - Letter from the Minister for Rail, Department for Transport relating to pre-appointment hearing for the Passenger Watchdog, dated 12 October 2026

Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Longford Residents Association, Molesey Residents Association, Putney Society, Back Heathrow, and Colne Valley Regional Park Trust

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Climate Change Committee, and Climate Change Committee

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Heathrow West Limited (HWL), Heathrow West Limited (HWL), and Stantec UK

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Heathrow Airport Limited, and Heathrow Airport Limited

Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement - Transport Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
25 Sep 2026
Fare play? Government's role in ticketing and pricing
Transport Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 13 Nov 2026)


The Transport Committee is exploring Government interventions in public transport fares, pricing and ticketing.

The inquiry will explore:

  • how the Government intervenes in public transport fares;
  • what outcomes the Government is seeking to achieve when developing fares strategies and whether outcomes are clearly articulated and effectively delivered;
  • what further outcomes the Government could seek to achieve in terms of wider benefits, and how it could intervene to achieve these.

 

Read the call for evidence