Debates between Alex Burghart and Sammy Wilson during the 2024 Parliament

Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over)

Debate between Alex Burghart and Sammy Wilson
Alex Burghart Portrait Alex Burghart
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is quite right. The process has become the punishment. The process is being used to continue the conflict by other means.

Sammy Wilson Portrait Sammy Wilson (East Antrim) (DUP)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Would the hon. Member accept that when the process exonerates the soldiers and the veterans at the end, the whole point of the process and taking them to the court in the first place is to give the daily headlines in the paper to allow Sinn Féin and the IRA to rewrite the history of the troubles?

Alex Burghart Portrait Alex Burghart
- Hansard - -

I must agree with the right hon. Gentleman that this is clearly what vexatious litigation looks like. This is vexatious litigation moved against men who did nothing wrong but are now confronted with a legal framework that creates endless potential for challenge against them.

Northern Ireland Troubles Bill

Debate between Alex Burghart and Sammy Wilson
2nd reading
Tuesday 18th November 2025

(5 months, 2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Northern Ireland Troubles Bill 2024-26 View all Northern Ireland Troubles Bill 2024-26 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alex Burghart Portrait Alex Burghart
- Hansard - -

I concur greatly with my hon. Friend’s remarks, and I will return to them in a few moments.

Sammy Wilson Portrait Sammy Wilson (East Antrim) (DUP)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The shadow Secretary of State pointed out that the Secretary of State assured us that there will be no input from the Irish Government set out in the Bill. Yet, first, the Irish Government were the only ones consulted. Secondly, there will be appointments made. Does he see the possibility that a Government who have acceded to the demands of the Irish Government in this Bill could also accede to suggestions for people to be nominated to the advisory committee, meaning they could therefore have Irish proxies under the Bill, despite the assurances given by the Secretary of State?

Alex Burghart Portrait Alex Burghart
- Hansard - -

The right hon. Gentleman raises interesting and important points. We are concerned about the question of who will have access to sensitive national security information within the legacy commission’s framework? It would be good to have clarity on that from the Minister later.

Sixthly, there was some confusion on the Labour Front Bench recently about whether former IRA personnel would be able to serve as a legacy commission officer or as a member of the victims and survivors advisory group. Perhaps when we get to Committee the Minister could clear that up and provide legal guarantees that that will not be the case.