Information between 13th June 2025 - 3rd July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260 |
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 20 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 291 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Conservative No votes vs 13 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 224 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 68 Conservative Aye votes vs 14 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 269 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 67 Conservative No votes vs 14 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 209 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 63 Conservative Aye votes vs 15 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 261 |
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Conservative Aye votes vs 15 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 266 |
13 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 71 Conservative Aye votes vs 12 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 254 |
13 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 71 Conservative Aye votes vs 11 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 216 |
13 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 71 Conservative Aye votes vs 13 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 230 Noes - 256 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 9 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 379 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 336 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 428 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 328 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 8 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 379 Noes - 137 |
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 335 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 390 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 95 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 114 Noes - 310 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313 |
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 305 |
Speeches |
---|
Alex Burghart speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Alex Burghart contributed 2 speeches (200 words) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
Alex Burghart speeches from: Green-belt Development: Rayleigh and Wickford
Alex Burghart contributed 1 speech (2 words) Friday 20th June 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Written Answers |
---|
Murder of Patrick Finucane Independent Inquiry: Finance
Asked by: Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) Wednesday 25th June 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how much funding he has allocated to the Finucane Inquiry. Answered by Hilary Benn - Secretary of State for Northern Ireland As I outlined in my oral statement of 11 September 2024, I considered the likely costs and impact of the Patrick Finucane Inquiry on public finances. It is the Government’s expectation that the Inquiry will avoid unnecessary costs given all the previous reviews and investigations and the large amount of information and material that is already in the public domain. Public inquiries regularly publish financial reports on their expenditure in the course of their work.
|
Chagos Islands: Sovereignty
Asked by: Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) Thursday 26th June 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the answer of 9 June 2025 to Question 57308, on Chagos Islands: Sovereignty, if she will place in the Library a copy of the (a) calculations and (b) analysis produced by the Government Actuary’s Department. Answered by Darren Jones - Chief Secretary to the Treasury Details of the calculations have been agreed by the Government Actuary’s Department and are in the Explanatory Memorandum laid alongside the Treaty. However, it is not normal practice for government departments to release details of corresponding financial analysis. Any financial obligations, including departmental budgetary responsibilities, will be managed responsibly within the government’s fiscal framework. No payments will be made until the Treaty is legally binding. |
Chagos Islands: Sovereignty
Asked by: Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) Thursday 26th June 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, with reference to the Prime Minister’s oral contribution at Prime Minister's Questions on 4 June 2025, Official Report, column 302, what the evidential basis is for the statement that China opposes the Chagos Islands deal. Answered by Stephen Doughty - Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) The deal to secure the base on Diego Garcia is vital for our national security. Our Five Eyes allies - the US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada - as well as India, South Korea and Japan, all put out formal statements welcoming the deal. There are clear safeguards in the treaty, including a clear prohibition to prevent any other foreign security forces, civilian or military - including the Chinese - from establishing themselves on the outer islands. |
National Security: Expenditure
Asked by: Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) Tuesday 1st July 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to Minister for the Cabinet Office's Oral Statement of 24 June 2025 on the National Security Strategy, Official Report, columns 974-76, what estimate he has made of the proportion of GDP spent on broader resilience and security spending in the most recent period for which data is available. Answered by Emma Reynolds - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The National Security Strategy 2025 was published on 24 June 2025. It confirms that by combining an increase in funding with recognition of the vital contribution the Single Intelligence Account plays to our national defence, the UK will spend 2.6% on NATO qualifying defence spending from 2027. This will be considered core spending. NATO provides reporting guidelines for the 1.5% defence and security related spending. It will include investments that raise the overall resilience of our societies, such as energy security, telecommunications, and infrastructure, as well as the execution of defence plans, expanding industrial capacity and innovation and counter hybrid actions. Along with all other NATO allies, the UK will report against the new categories of defence spending at the next NATO reporting deadline. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Green-belt Development: Rayleigh and Wickford
9 speeches (5,008 words) Friday 20th June 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Mark Francois (Con - Rayleigh and Wickford) Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart)—he is in his place in the Chamber, listening - Link to Speech |