Information between 1st September 2025 - 11th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
2 Sep 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 365 Noes - 164 |
2 Sep 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 367 |
3 Sep 2025 - Property Taxes - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 335 |
3 Sep 2025 - Hospitality Sector - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 334 |
4 Sep 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 71 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 74 |
4 Sep 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 331 Noes - 73 |
4 Sep 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 74 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 77 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87 |
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300 |
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 |
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 171 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 96 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 160 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 404 Noes - 98 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 158 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 402 Noes - 97 |
8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Alex Burghart voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 398 Noes - 93 |
Speeches |
---|
Alex Burghart speeches from: Privilege
Alex Burghart contributed 1 speech (167 words) Thursday 4th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Alex Burghart speeches from: House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
Alex Burghart contributed 20 speeches (2,421 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Thursday 4th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Office for Value for Money: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) Wednesday 10th September 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the evidential basis is for the Office for Value for Money making almost £14 billion of annual efficiency gains by 2028-29 against planned day-to-day budgets for 2025-26. Answered by James Murray - Chief Secretary to the Treasury The OVfM has supported departments to develop bespoke technical efficiency targets, underpinned by credible delivery plans. In total, the government identified efficiencies of almost £14 billion a year by 2028-29.
The OVfM’s approach was guided by three principles, which together will deliver a sustainable outcome. First, it has placed greater focus on improving outcomes not just reducing costs. It has achieved this by clearly distinguishing between technical efficiencies (delivering more output for the same input, or the same output for less input) and stopping activities (reducing outputs). This is in line with the Government Efficiency Framework definition of a technical efficiency. Second, it has aimed to increase confidence in the deliverability of efficiencies, by working with departments to develop bespoke targets underpinned by credible plans. Third, it has supported greater transparency by publishing departments’ targets and plans, allowing external scrutiny and public accountability.
Further detail on the basis for departments’ targets and plans can be found in the Departmental Efficiency Delivery Plans document published at Spending Review 2025: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/departmental-efficiency-delivery-plans.
|
MP Financial Interests |
---|
1st September 2025
Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 28 February 2025 - £200.00 Source |
1st September 2025
Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 30 April 2025 - £200.00 Source |
1st September 2025
Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 31 July 2025 - £350.00 Source |
1st September 2025
Alex Burghart (Conservative - Brentwood and Ongar) 1. Employment and earnings Writing reviews - The Spectator Source |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Wednesday 10th September Alex Burghart signed this EDM on Wednesday 10th September 2025 22 signatures (Most recent: 15 Sep 2025) Tabled by: Gavin Williamson (Conservative - Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge) That this House notes the concerning revelations regarding Lord Mandelson’s close friendship with the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein; expresses its concern at his lack of transparency regarding this relationship; requests for parliamentary time to be made available to debate this urgent matter; and calls for Lord Mandelson to resign as … |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
184 speeches (24,276 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Thursday 4th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Mark Sewards (Lab - Leeds South West and Morley) Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart) chunters from a sedentary position, but I am more than - Link to Speech 2: Pete Wishart (SNP - Perth and Kinross-shire) Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart); I just do not know what was missing. - Link to Speech 3: Phil Brickell (Lab - Bolton West) Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart) about his concerns that this is all a numbers game. - Link to Speech 4: Kevin Bonavia (Lab - Stevenage) Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart), and some of those on the Benches behind him. - Link to Speech 5: Gareth Snell (LAB - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart), disputed my figure. - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Sep. 04 2025
Committee to draw up Reasons for disagreeing to Lords Amendments - 4 September 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill 2024-26 Minutes of Reasons Committee Found: Amendments THURSDAY 04 SEPTEMBER 2025 Members present: Nick Thomas-Symonds, in the Chair Alex Burghart |