Adrian Sanders

Liberal Democrat - Former Member for Torbay

First elected: 1st May 1997

Left House: 30th March 2015 (Defeated)


Adrian Sanders is not a member of any APPGs
Panel of Chairs
7th Nov 2013 - 30th Mar 2015
Transport Committee
21st Jan 2013 - 30th Mar 2015
Opposition Deputy Chief Whip (Commons)
10th Mar 2006 - 6th May 2010
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee
10th Nov 2003 - 12th Jul 2005
Shadow Spokesperson (Communities and Local Government)
1st Jun 2001 - 1st Jun 2002
Opposition Whip (Commons)
1st Jun 1997 - 1st Jun 2001
Shadow Spokesperson (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
1st Jun 1999 - 1st Jun 2001
Shadow Spokesperson (Communities and Local Government)
1st Jun 1997 - 1st Jun 2001
Consolidation etc. Bills (Joint Committee)
28th Jul 1997 - 11th May 2001


Division Voting information

Adrian Sanders has voted in 1715 divisions, and 69 times against the majority of their Party.

25 Mar 2015 - Infrastructure Planning - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 30 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 33
11 Feb 2015 - Infrastructure Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 25 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 203
15 Dec 2014 - Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (England) - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 34 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 313
10 Nov 2014 - Business of the House (Today) - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 242
10 Nov 2014 - Criminal Law - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 40 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 229 Noes - 272
15 Jul 2014 - Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill (Business of the House) - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 38 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 436 Noes - 49
15 Jul 2014 - Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 39 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 56 Noes - 454
15 Jul 2014 - Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 38 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 449 Noes - 33
10 Mar 2014 - Care Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 13 Noes - 276
12 Feb 2014 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 32 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 185
22 Jan 2014 - Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 278
22 Jan 2014 - Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 0 Noes - 0
14 Jan 2014 - Offender Rehabilitation Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 42 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 313
14 Jan 2014 - Offender Rehabilitation Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 44 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 315
9 Oct 2013 - Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 260
5 Jun 2013 - Badger Cull - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 30 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 299
4 Jun 2013 - Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 16 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 29 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 290
16 Apr 2013 - Growth and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 38 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 259
16 Apr 2013 - Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 244
16 Apr 2013 - Defamation Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 230
21 Jan 2013 - Welfare Benefits Up-rating Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 36 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 246
17 Dec 2012 - Growth and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 260
24 Oct 2012 - Onshore Gas - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 26 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 206
11 Jul 2012 - Sittings of the House - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 21 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 22 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 256
11 Jul 2012 - Sittings of the House - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 19 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 25 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 233
18 Apr 2012 - Finance (No. 4) Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 33 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 295
17 Apr 2012 - Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 251
20 Mar 2012 - Health and Social Care Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 42 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 313
13 Mar 2012 - Health and Social Care Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 6 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 314
12 Mar 2012 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 27 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 186
12 Mar 2012 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 13 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 20 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 166
12 Mar 2012 - Backbench Business Committee - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 21 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 82
21 Feb 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 36 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 263
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 47 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 201
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 47 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 201
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 47 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 201
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 47 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 201
8 Feb 2012 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 47 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 201
1 Feb 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 8 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 265
1 Feb 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 334 Noes - 251
1 Feb 2012 - Welfare Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 268
1 Feb 2012 - Green Investment Bank - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 212
1 Feb 2012 - Green Investment Bank - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 213
1 Feb 2012 - Green Investment Bank - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 212
1 Feb 2012 - Green Investment Bank - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 212
25 Jan 2012 - North Sea Oil and Gas - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 203
25 Jan 2012 - North Sea Oil and Gas - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 202
1 Nov 2011 - Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 23 Noes - 300
24 Oct 2011 - National Referendum on the European Union - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 50 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 111 Noes - 483
14 Sep 2011 - Energy Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 281
7 Sep 2011 - Health and Social Care (Re-committed) Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 31 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 304
7 Sep 2011 - Health and Social Care (Re-committed) Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 251
6 Sep 2011 - Health and Social Care (Re-committed) Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 36 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 239 Noes - 292
4 Jul 2011 - Finance (No. 3) Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 273
22 Jun 2011 - Smoking in Private Vehicles - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 11 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 66
17 May 2011 - Localism Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 36 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 232
17 May 2011 - Localism Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 40 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 308
2 Feb 2011 - Public Forest Estate (England) - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 43 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 310
15 Dec 2010 - Water Supplies (Developing World) - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 33 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 221
9 Dec 2010 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 21 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 302
9 Dec 2010 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 21 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 302
1 Nov 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 49 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 326
1 Nov 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 9 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 42 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 315
25 Oct 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 48 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 293
18 Oct 2010 - Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 50 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 346
13 Oct 2010 - Public Houses and Private Members’ Clubs (Smoking) Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 18 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 141
22 Oct 2008 - Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 18 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 31 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 308
31 Mar 2008 - Housing and Regeneration Bill - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 37 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 263
25 Oct 2007 - Modernisation of the House of Commons - View Vote Context
Adrian Sanders voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 5 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 74
View All Adrian Sanders Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Department Debates
Department of Health and Social Care
(32 debate contributions)
Department for Transport
(26 debate contributions)
Cabinet Office
(14 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Adrian Sanders has not made any spoken contributions to legislative debate
View all Adrian Sanders's debates

Latest EDMs signed by Adrian Sanders

17th March 2015
Adrian Sanders signed this EDM on Monday 23rd March 2015

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION FUTURE FUNDING CAMPAIGN

Tabled by: Clive Betts (Labour - Sheffield South East)
That this House welcomes the Local Government Association's Future Funding campaign and supports its aim of securing sustainable long-term funding for local authorities; acknowledges that councils have made £20 billion worth of savings since 2010, and applauds their resilience and ability to innovate; recognises that millions of people rely on …
30 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 11
Conservative: 2
Independent: 1
9th March 2015
Adrian Sanders signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 9th March 2015

MEDIATION WITH UNESCO FOR THE REPATRIATION OF THE PARTHENON SCULPTURES

Tabled by: Andrew George (Liberal Democrat - St Ives)
That this House is aware that half of the Parthenon sculptures, controversially removed from Athens by Lord Elgin 210 years ago using a flimsy legal justification during the Ottoman occupation of Greece, remain on display in the British Museum; notes that, when presented with the facts, the British public favours …
20 signatures
(Most recent: 25 Mar 2015)
Signatures by party:
Labour: 7
Conservative: 1
Plaid Cymru: 1
Independent: 1
View All Adrian Sanders's signed Early Day Motions

Commons initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Adrian Sanders, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.

MPs who are act as Ministers or Shadow Ministers are generally restricted from performing Commons initiatives other than Urgent Questions.


Adrian Sanders has not been granted any Urgent Questions

Adrian Sanders has not been granted any Adjournment Debates

2 Bills introduced by Adrian Sanders


The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to consolidate Regulations relating to tenancies in the social and private housing sectors; and for connected purposes

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Wednesday 28th November 2012

The Bill failed to complete its passage through Parliament before the end of the session. This means the Bill will make no further progress. A Bill to require landlords to provide smoke alarms in rented accommodation; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Last Event - 1st Reading: House Of Commons
Wednesday 30th June 2010

Adrian Sanders has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 50 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
3 Other Department Questions
14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, how many visits were made by Ministers of his Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

The Department’s Ministers, from time to time, carry out official visits to different parts of the UK to conduct departmental business.

The Department does not keep a central record of such visits.

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many visits were made by Ministers of his Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

No official visits have been made to the Torbay constituency by the Department’s Ministers during the period 14 October 2013 to 14 October 2014.

25th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, if he will make it his policy to introduce a legal requirement for pubcos to offer a free-of-tie option in the public house sector.

The Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill, introduced to this House on 25 June 2014, does not include provision for mandatory free-of-tie. The Government recognises that some tenant groups and campaigners support this option, which might appear to offer a simple way of ensuring that tied tenants are no worse off than free-of-tie tenants. We looked carefully at this measure but have decided not to introduce it.

The responses to the Government's consultation on a Statutory Code and Adjudicator for the pubs sector raised concerns that mandatory free-of-tie would create uncertainty for pub-owning companies and have an unpredictable impact on the wider pubs sector which could even undermine the tied model. Even among the polarised views in the industry, there is strong support for the tie as a business model. What is important to the Government is that there are protections in place so that the tied model operates fairly. The reforms being taken forward in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill will rebalance the relationship between pub-owning companies and their tied tenants, without threatening the balance of the wider industry.

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the average time taken to process applications for redundancy payment is through My Civil Service Pension; and what steps he is taking to reduce the time taken.

MyCSP Ltd, a mutual joint venture, provides scheme administration for the Civil Service pension arrangements under a contract managed by the Cabinet Office.

Redundancy schemes under the Civil Service Compensation Scheme are covered by separate commercial arrangements between MyCSP Ltd and each individual employer.

The average time for completing these individual exercises is not collated centrally.

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the standardised mortality rate from diabetes was in each parliamentary constituency in the latest year for which figures are available; and what the average standardised mortality rate from diabetes in England was in each of the last 15 years.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the Authority to reply.

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many visits were made by Ministers of his Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

The Secretary of State visited the Torbay constituency on 17th September 2014. His visit was to Kents Cavern, part of the Geopark in Torbay. The invitation came from the local Conservative candidate for Torbay, Kevin Foster. All travel was provided by the Conservative party with no cost to the public purse.

Kevin Foster also passed on an invitation to visit Torbay to the previous Secretary of State, Maria Miller. This invitation came from the Torbay Tourism Association and was taken up on 5th March 2014. She attended and spoke at a lunch event hosted by the Torbay Tourism Association marking their Annual Open Day/Exhibition. The minister took the train from Paddington to Exeter St David’s and returned via the same route. The cost of three return tickets (including officials) was £192.75, so £64.25 per person. The minister was driven to Torbay from Exeter at no cost to public purse.

In both these cases, the Secretaries of State were driven by Kevin Foster, with the costs borne directly by him.

Helen Grant
Shadow Solicitor General
30th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what recent steps his Department has taken to further the provision of high speed broadband in the Heart of the South West area.

Devon and Somerset has already received nearly £32 million to provide superfast broadband to 95% of premises by early 2016. We have recently announced a further £22.75 million to extend coverage to 95% by 2017 . Devon and Somerset will also be the location for one of the pilots looking at the potential to go beyond 95% coverage.

26th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what future foreign visits the Minister for Sport, Tourism and Equalities has planned in relation to her departmental duties; and if he will make a statement.

A number of visits have been proposed by other government departments but I currently have no plans for any further foreign visits at this time.

Helen Grant
Shadow Solicitor General
26th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what the cost is of all foreign visits undertaken by the Minister for Sport, Tourism and Equalities as part of her official duties to date.

Details of Ministers' visits overseas are published quarterly and can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/expenses-and-hospitality

The latest data available at this time is:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dcms-meetings-and-hospitality-data-october-to-december-2013

Helen Grant
Shadow Solicitor General
26th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many foreign visits the Minister for Sport, Tourism and Equalities has made arising from her departmental roles; and if he will make a statement.

Details of Ministers' visits overseas are published quarterly and can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/expenses-and-hospitality

The latest data available at this time is:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dcms-meetings-and-hospitality-data-october-to-december-2013

Helen Grant
Shadow Solicitor General
26th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what the cost was of the Minister for Sport, Tourism and Equalities' recent visit to Brazil; and if he will make a statement.

Details of Ministers' visits overseas are published quarterly and can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/expenses-and-hospitality

The latest data available at this time is:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dcms-meetings-and-hospitality-data-october-to-december-2013

Helen Grant
Shadow Solicitor General
14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many visits were made by Ministers of her Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

I visited Torbay constituency on 17 July 2014, at the invitation of my hon. Friend, the Member for Newton Abbot, Anne Marie Morris. The visit was part of a wider trip to schools in Devon which cost £427.82 in total.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to help schools that are unable to deliver free infant school meals in September 2014 because of a lack of capital funding.

The Department for Education has previously confirmed that it would be allocating £150 million in the 2014-15 financial year to support the implementation of the universal infant free school meals (UIFSM) policy. Local authorities (LAs) are also free to use their budgets for improvement and maintenance to support this objective. We allocated £1.4 billion to schools, LAs and the Academies Capital Maintenance Fund for maintenance and improvement in 2014-15.

On 6 March we launched a package of implementation support measures to help schools to provide meals to eligible pupils. This includes a national UIFSM support service, run by school food experts, which will offer advice and guidance to schools that need assistance in implementing UIFSM. The support will include a telephone helpline, the sharing of good practice, and intensive face-to-face support

The Department also announced on 6 March that it would be providing transitional funding to small schools with eligible pupils, worth a minimum of £3,000, which qualifying schools will be able to use to help them overcome delivery challenges.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to increase freedoms for special schools to design their own curriculum.

The new national curriculum, to be taught from September 2014, sets out only the essential knowledge that all children should acquire, and leaves teachers to decide how to teach this most effectively and to design a wider school curriculum that best meets the needs of their pupils.

For all pupils with special educational needs (SEN), including those who attend special schools, lessons should be planned to ensure that there are no barriers to achievement. In many cases, such planning will mean that these pupils will be able to study the full national curriculum.

The SEN Code of Practice includes statutory guidance on identifying and supporting pupils with SEN and adapting teaching approaches to ensure they have access to the same opportunities as their peers.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he is taking to increase the involvement of practising teachers in the design of the national curriculum.

The new national curriculum, which was published on 11 September 2013, has been developed with due regard to the views of subject experts, teachers, and the findings of international best practice comparisons. Over 2,470 of the responses to the consultation on the new curriculum were from individual teachers, headteachers and schools. In response to the representations, changes were made to improve clarity, precision and consistency of the content.

We are confident that our reform to the national curriculum will give teachers greater flexibility and freedom than ever before, which will help to raise standards and expectations for all pupils. The national curriculum has been significantly slimmed down and will free up teachers to use their professional judgement to design curricula that meet the needs of their pupils.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps he has taken since 2010 to ensure that (a) primary and (b) secondary schools are equipped to support children with diabetes.

Schools are already required to support children with long-term medical conditions such as diabetes. Non-statutory guidance, “Managing Medicines in Schools and Early Years Settings”, is available to schools to help them manage medicines and support children with medical needs such as diabetes.

From September 2014, there will be a new duty, which was introduced in the Children and Families Act 2014, on governing bodies of maintained schools and proprietors of academies to make arrangements to support pupils at school with medical conditions and to have regard to statutory guidance. The guidance, upon which we have consulted publicly, will set out the requirements on schools to support children with medical conditions, which we would expect them to apply to conditions like diabetes.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will make an estimate of the capital costs incurred by schools as a result of the implementation of universal infant free school meals; and whether the capital funding provided by his Department to schools to date covers such costs.

The Department for Education consulted with a number of local authorities and schools in the autumn, in order to assess the potential capital needs to meet the new universal infant free school meal (UIFSM) entitlement. Circumstances differ between schools, and between authorities, but those discussions gave us an assessment of the range of likely costs.

Based on those discussions, we believe the £150 million of capital funding announced last December is an appropriate figure to support schools and authorities in meeting the new UIFSM entitlement. We know that many schools and authorities are still in the process of considering the best way of delivering this. That is why we are supplementing this capital support with the package of implementation support measures announced on 6 March, in order to offer advice and guidance to schools and local authorities that need assistance in implementing the policy.

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many visits were made by Ministers of her Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

There have been no official Ministerial invitations or visits to the Torbay constituency in 12 months to 14 October 2014.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment he has made of trends in the level of fish stocks in the English Channel over the last 10 years; and if he will make a statement.

At the annual EU fishing quota negotiations in December I secured a deal on quotas for 2014 which was positive both for the sustainability of UK fish stocks and our fishing industry. My position on quotas was based on three clear principles: following the available scientific advice; achieving sustainable levels of fishing (known as Maximum Sustainable Yield) by 2015 where possible and by 2020 at the latest; and reducing discards.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is taking to preserve and increase fish stocks in UK waters.

The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) makes an annual assessment of the status and trends in fish stocks. This includes assessments for the main commercial stocks in the English Channel. These are available on the ICES website.

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many visits were made by Ministers of her Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

There were no DFID visits to Torbay by ministers in the last 12 months.

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many visits were made by Ministers of his Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

No ministerial visits were made to Torbay constituency in the specified period. As is the convention, however, Members of Parliament would be notified in advance of any Ministerial visits to their constituency if they were to occur.

23rd Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent discussions he has had with train operating companies on the nature and level of compensation available to passengers for delayed and cancelled services; and if he will make a statement.

All Train Operating Companies (TOCs) are required under their franchise agreement to have in place a Passenger's Charter which will include arrangements for compensation for passengers.

In connection with the severe weather related disruption earlier this year, the Department for Transport (DfT) sought to understand what First Great Western's proposals on compensation were likely to be. Where discussions have taken place with other TOCs these will also have been to ensure that the DfT was aware of their intentions and not to seek to require these to be changed.

An improved system of compensation based on delays to individual journeys, known as Delay/Repay, is being introduced for all passengers in place of the system of poor performance discounts and optional Void Days for season ticket holders.  Introduction is taking place as franchises are let following competitions and opportunities arise within Direct Awards and existing franchises.  Where discussions have taken place between the DfT and TOCs these will have been in this context.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what compensation will be available to train operating companies as a result of the rail line closures in the South West of England in early 2014.

Any compensation for the train operators in respect of the rail line closures in the South West of England in early 2014 would be paid by Network Rail in accordance with the track access agreement between Network Rail and the individual train operating companies, as regulated by the Office of Rail Regulation.

14th Oct 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many visits were made by Ministers of his Department to Torbay constituency in the 12 months to 14 October 2014; whom the invitation for each such visit was issued by; and what the cost to the public purse was of each such visit.

The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and the ministers of his Department have made no visits in the 12 months to October 2014 to the Torbay constituency in a ministerial capacity.

7th Jul 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff by grade and full-time equivalence are currently employed by his Department in dealing with policy on benefit sanctioning.

The information is not readily available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

25th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what reforms his Department plans to make to the Work Programme following the downgrading of the project's rating from green to amber by the Major Projects Authority.

The Major Projects Authority has not downgraded the Work Programmes project rating. The rating was amber in 2012/13 and has remained amber in 2013/14.

25th Jun 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will place in the Library a copy of the risk register for the universal credit programme.

In line with standard practice, as the Universal Credit risk register includes details of a sensitive nature the Department will not be putting the risk register into the public domain.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average waiting time is for a personal independence payment assessment for claimants in (a) the Torbay local authority area, (b) the South West and (c) England.

Personal independence payment (PIP) started from April 2013 and although limited data has started to feed through, we need to wait until the Department has quality assured, meaningful figures for publication. The Department is working to guidelines set by the UK Statistics Authority to ensure we are able to publish statistics that meet high quality standards at the earliest opportunity. We intend to publish official statistics on PIP from spring 2014 in line with our publication strategy:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284330/pip_stats_release_strategy_feb14.pdf

An ad-hoc release of PIP information was published on 11 February 2014.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to his letter of 20 March 2014, what the evidential basis is for his statement that allowing people receiving employment and support allowance to do some work within a specified 52 week period is the best way of encouraging a move towards work of 16 hours or more a week.

The permitted work rules in Employment and Support Allowance are based on those which applied to Incapacity Benefit. This approach was supported by evidence contained in DWP Research Report 268 “Final outcome from Permitted Work Rules”.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average waiting time for a work capability assessment is for claimants in (a) Torbay local authority area, (b) the South West region and (c) England.

The average waiting time for a Work Capability Assessment in the period from March 2013 to February 2014 is as follows:

Torbay local authority area – the information is not available in respect of Local Authority areas

The South West - 110 working days

England - 71 working days

We announced in a Written Ministerial Statement on 27 March our plans to achieve a reduction in waiting times and next steps, including Atos Healthcare's withdrawal from delivery of Work Capability Assessments in Great Britain before the end of the current contract .

Atos Healthcare will continue to deliver Work Capability Assessments until contract exit and will still be subject to a quality and service credit regime. We will continue to work with Atos to ensure they can deliver the best service possible to claimants until they leave the contract.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment he has made of the capability of the Work Programme to provide adequate support to jobseekers with long-term medical conditions.

The Department has commissioned an independent evaluation of the Work Programme, and will publish findings once the evaluation is complete.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, whether patient uptake of insulin pumps has reached the levels set by the NICE technology appraisal 151 benchmarking tool issued in July 2008; how many people have taken up the use of such pumps; and if he will make a statement.

Commissioners and providers should make insulin pumps available for those people with Type 1 diabetes who meet the criteria in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s technology appraisal guidance on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (TA151) as well as ensuring that relevant structured patient education is provided to support people newly diagnosed with diabetes and at appropriate points in their life as their condition progresses.

Information on the number of people using insulin pumps is not collected centrally.

The United Kingdom Insulin Pump Audit, published in May 2013, collected data from across the United Kingdom. The audit demonstrated that 6% of adults with Type 1 diabetes and 19% of children with Type 1 diabetes were being treated with insulin pumps. The audit’s findings are available at:

www.diabetes.org.uk/Documents/News/The_United_Kingdom_Insulin_Pump_Audit_May_2013.pdf

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what estimate he has made of the number of people in England who are eligible for a medical exemption certificate.

As of 31 January 2015 the number of people in England who hold a valid medical exemption certificate is 1,769,872. This is based on the number of certificates issued by the NHS Business Services Authority within the previous five years.

No estimate has been made of the number of people in England who meet the underlying eligibility criteria for a medical exemption certificate.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people in England currently hold a medical exemption certificate.

As of 31 January 2015 the number of people in England who hold a valid medical exemption certificate is 1,769,872. This is based on the number of certificates issued by the NHS Business Services Authority within the previous five years.

No estimate has been made of the number of people in England who meet the underlying eligibility criteria for a medical exemption certificate.

23rd Feb 2015
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department has made of the patient experience of people with diabetes.

NHS England surveys capture the experiences of people with a wide range of conditions including diabetes but, with the exception of the cancer patient experience survey, they are not condition specific. As part of a forthcoming review of patient experience surveys, NHS England will consider whether it is best to collect information as it does currently or by specific conditions.

Professor Jonathan Valabhji, the National Clinical Director, has reported that last year’s Patient Experience of Diabetes Services pilot survey, which collected information from people with diabetes about their care, received very positive feedback.

15th Dec 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 3 December 2014 to Question 216036, if he will place in the Library data tables from the Care Quality Commission's bespoke analyses, referred to in its report Thematic data review of diabetes care pathways, published on 16 October 2014, broken down by (a) commissioner and (b) provider.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and adult social care in England.

A copy of the information requested has been attached.

The CQC has advised that the attached dataset contains the breakdown (at National Health Service acute provider and clinical commissioning group (CCG) level) of bespoke analysis carried out by the CQC as part of the 'Thematic data review of diabetes care pathways: secondary care analysis comparing people with and without diabetes' that was published alongside the CQC's 2013/14 State of Care report on 16 October 2014.

The analysis compares the outcomes within each provider or CCG for people with diabetes against a reference group of similar people without diabetes. It is not a comparison of performance between providers or CCGs and it would be inappropriate to use the data in this way. The analysis at provider and CCG level should be treated as experimental and the measures should not be considered as judgements of providers or CCGs.

25th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many hospital admissions for (a) hypoglycaemia and (b) diabetic ketoacidosis there were in each local commissioning area of people aged (i) 17 and under, (ii) between 17 and 65 and (iii) 65 and over in each of the last 10 years.

The attached table shows finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary diagnosis of hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis by primary care trust (PCT) of residence for ages (i) 0 to 17, (ii) 18 to 64 and (iii) 65 and over from 2003-04 to 2012-13. PCT of residence has been used as this data is available for the 10 year period requested.

The data we have provided should not be considered a count of people as the same person may have been admitted on more than one occasion.

Reference should be made to the footnotes when interpreting the data.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health of 18 June 2014, Official Report, column 111WH, on Melbourne Declaration on diabetes, what discussions (a) Ministers and (b) officials in his Department have had with NHS England on plans to roll out the diabetes patient experience survey across all NHS services in England.

The Patient Experience of Diabetes Services survey is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, on behalf of NHS England, and delivered by the Health and Social Care Information Centre, working in collaboration with Diabetes UK and Public Health England (PHE). It will therefore be a matter for PHE and NHS England to decide on future plans for this survey.

There has been no decision made about the future of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey. NHS England is currently reviewing the whole National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme collectively, including the pilots that have reported. The first of these meetings was on 11 November.

My Rt. hon. Friend, The Secretary of State meets with NHS England on a weekly basis and discusses a wide range of healthcare issues.

However, there have been no specific discussions between the Secretary of State for Health and NHS England on the future funding of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey or between Ministers and officials of the Department and NHS England on plans to roll out the diabetes patient experience survey across all NHS services in England.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment his Department has made of the results of the pilot Patient Experience of Diabetes Services survey published in June 2014; and if he will make a statement.

The Patient Experience of Diabetes Services survey is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, on behalf of NHS England, and delivered by the Health and Social Care Information Centre, working in collaboration with Diabetes UK and Public Health England (PHE). It will therefore be a matter for PHE and NHS England to decide on future plans for this survey.

There has been no decision made about the future of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey. NHS England is currently reviewing the whole National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme collectively, including the pilots that have reported. The first of these meetings was on 11 November.

My Rt. hon. Friend, The Secretary of State meets with NHS England on a weekly basis and discusses a wide range of healthcare issues.

However, there have been no specific discussions between the Secretary of State for Health and NHS England on the future funding of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey or between Ministers and officials of the Department and NHS England on plans to roll out the diabetes patient experience survey across all NHS services in England.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what discussions has he had with NHS England on the future funding of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey.

The Patient Experience of Diabetes Services survey is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, on behalf of NHS England, and delivered by the Health and Social Care Information Centre, working in collaboration with Diabetes UK and Public Health England (PHE). It will therefore be a matter for PHE and NHS England to decide on future plans for this survey.

There has been no decision made about the future of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey. NHS England is currently reviewing the whole National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme collectively, including the pilots that have reported. The first of these meetings was on 11 November.

My Rt. hon. Friend, The Secretary of State meets with NHS England on a weekly basis and discusses a wide range of healthcare issues.

However, there have been no specific discussions between the Secretary of State for Health and NHS England on the future funding of the Patient Experience of Diabetes Survey or between Ministers and officials of the Department and NHS England on plans to roll out the diabetes patient experience survey across all NHS services in England.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the average length of stay in hospital was for people with (a) fractured neck of femur, (b) appendectomy, (c) drainage of abscess, (d) essential hypertension (diabetes related), (e) chronic ischaemic heart disease (diabetes related), (f) acute myocardial infarction (diabetes related), (g) stroke (diabetes related), (h) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (i) asthma, (k) congestive heart failure (diabetes related), (l) peripheral vascular disease (diabetes related), (m) chronic kidney failure (diabetes related), (n) lower limb amputation (but excluding patients with malignancies or injury/trauma) (diabetes related) in each NHS commissioner area in each of the last five years.

The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is attached.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the rate of emergency hospital admissions was for people with (a) fractured neck of femur, (b) appendectomy, (c) drainage of abscess, (d) essential hypertension (diabetes related), (e) chronic ischaemic heart (disease diabetes related), (f) acute myocardial infarction (diabetes related), (g) stroke (diabetes related), (h) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (i) asthma, (k) congestive heart failure (diabetes related), (l) peripheral vascular disease (diabetes related), (m) chronic kidney failure (diabetes related), (n) lower limb amputation (but excluding patients with malignancies or injury/trauma) (diabetes related) in each NHS commissioner area in each of the last five years.

This information is not available in the format requested.

Information concerning the number of finished admission episodes and a rate per 100,000 of the population where the method of admission was an emergency by primary care trust of residence for the years 2008-09 to 2012-13 is attached.

It should be noted that this is not a count of people as the same person may have had more than one admission episode within the same time period.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many adult patients on insulin therapy have been offered an Insulin Passport in each NHS commissioning area in each of the last five years.

We do not hold information on the number of adult patients on insulin therapy who have been offered an Insulin Passport in each NHS commissioning area in each of the last five years.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many people have had their feet amputated as a result of diabetes in each NHS commissioning area in each of the last five years.

The attached table shows both Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for finished consultant episodes with a primary diagnosis of diabetes and a primary or secondary procedure of amputation of the foot or toe, as well as National Diabetes Audit (NDA) figures for the number of diabetes patients in the audit having major or minor amputations the following year. The NDA figures are only available for 2009-10 and 2010-11.

Reference should be made to the notes provided with the table when interpreting these figures.

18th Nov 2014
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the standardised ratio for mortality in hospital within 30 days of admission was for people with (a) fractured neck of femur, (b) appendectomy, (c) drainage of abscess, (d) essential hypertension (diabetes related), (e) chronic ischaemic heart disease (diabetes related), (f) acute myocardial infarction (diabetes related), (g) stroke (diabetes related), (h) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (i) asthma, (k) congestive heart failure (diabetes related), (l) peripheral vascular disease (diabetes related), (m) chronic kidney failure (diabetes related), (n) lower limb amputation (but excluding patients with malignancies or injury/trauma) (diabetes related) in each NHS commissioner area in each of the last five years.

This information is not collected in the format requested.