Debates between Victoria Atkins and Mike Amesbury during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Victoria Atkins and Mike Amesbury
Tuesday 9th May 2023

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mike Amesbury Portrait Mike Amesbury (Weaver Vale) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Why are the Prime Minister and Government Ministers so keen to protect non-dom status while not investing sufficiently in our NHS, as Labour would do?

Victoria Atkins Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Victoria Atkins)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I hope the hon. Gentleman knows that we are spending record amounts on the NHS. We are also mindful that non-doms pay some £7.9 billion in UK taxes on their UK earnings and have invested some £6 billion since 2012. So we are mindful of the very real impact that they make on our revenues, but we have managed to tighten the rules around non-dom status, and that is why—

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Victoria Atkins and Mike Amesbury
Tuesday 20th December 2022

(1 year, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Victoria Atkins Portrait Victoria Atkins
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My right hon. and learned Friend is one of the people who knows most about corporate criminal liability. I would be happy to take his question away and discuss it with him, because it is critical that the justice system addresses not just individuals who have criminal liability, but companies; indeed, I have prosecuted many companies across a range of offences. We understand that they can commit crimes too, so I am very happy to take his question away.

Mike Amesbury Portrait Mike Amesbury (Weaver Vale) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will Treasury Ministers work with Transport Ministers to give Avanti West Coast’s customers an early Christmas present by removing the contract from it, putting it into public ownership and saving the taxpayer an absolute fortune?