Information between 5th January 2026 - 25th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 5th January 2026 Victoria Atkins (Conservative - Louth and Horncastle) Urgent question - Main Chamber Subject: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if she will make a statement on the changes to Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185 |
|
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles: Legacy and Reconciliation - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 106 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 194 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Victoria Atkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Victoria Atkins speeches from: Water White Paper
Victoria Atkins contributed 1 speech (698 words) Wednesday 21st January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Victoria Atkins speeches from: Rural Communities
Victoria Atkins contributed 7 speeches (2,033 words) Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Victoria Atkins speeches from: Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief
Victoria Atkins contributed 2 speeches (322 words) Monday 5th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Agriculture: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Victoria Atkins (Conservative - Louth and Horncastle) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate her Department has made of the number of a) farms b) agricultural businesses and c) non-agricultural businesses that will pay additional inheritance after April 2026 following proposed changes to Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Compared to Budget 2025, the expected number of estates claiming agricultural property relief (including those also claiming business property relief) affected by the reforms in 2026-27 halves from 375 to 185. Around 85% of estates claiming agricultural property relief in 2026-27, including those that also claim for business property relief, are forecast to pay no more inheritance tax on their estates under these changes.
Excluding estates only holding shares designated as ‘not listed’ on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, the reforms are also now expected to result in up to 220 estates across the UK only claiming business property relief paying more inheritance tax in 2026-27. This is a reduction from up to 325 such estates forecast to pay more at Budget 2025. This means just over 80% of such estates making claims are forecast to not pay any more inheritance tax.
Further information is available in the updated Tax Impact and Information Note (TIIN) which was published on 9 January: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief.
As is normal practice, the Exchequer cost of these changes will be considered by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and published at the Spring Forecast. |
|
Agriculture: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Victoria Atkins (Conservative - Louth and Horncastle) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to publish an impact assessment on the proposal to change the Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property threshold to £2.5million. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Compared to Budget 2025, the expected number of estates claiming agricultural property relief (including those also claiming business property relief) affected by the reforms in 2026-27 halves from 375 to 185. Around 85% of estates claiming agricultural property relief in 2026-27, including those that also claim for business property relief, are forecast to pay no more inheritance tax on their estates under these changes.
Excluding estates only holding shares designated as ‘not listed’ on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, the reforms are also now expected to result in up to 220 estates across the UK only claiming business property relief paying more inheritance tax in 2026-27. This is a reduction from up to 325 such estates forecast to pay more at Budget 2025. This means just over 80% of such estates making claims are forecast to not pay any more inheritance tax.
Further information is available in the updated Tax Impact and Information Note (TIIN) which was published on 9 January: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief.
As is normal practice, the Exchequer cost of these changes will be considered by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and published at the Spring Forecast. |
|
Agriculture: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Victoria Atkins (Conservative - Louth and Horncastle) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the changes to the threshold for Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property to £2.5million has been scored by the Office for Budget Responsibility. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Compared to Budget 2025, the expected number of estates claiming agricultural property relief (including those also claiming business property relief) affected by the reforms in 2026-27 halves from 375 to 185. Around 85% of estates claiming agricultural property relief in 2026-27, including those that also claim for business property relief, are forecast to pay no more inheritance tax on their estates under these changes.
Excluding estates only holding shares designated as ‘not listed’ on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, the reforms are also now expected to result in up to 220 estates across the UK only claiming business property relief paying more inheritance tax in 2026-27. This is a reduction from up to 325 such estates forecast to pay more at Budget 2025. This means just over 80% of such estates making claims are forecast to not pay any more inheritance tax.
Further information is available in the updated Tax Impact and Information Note (TIIN) which was published on 9 January: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief.
As is normal practice, the Exchequer cost of these changes will be considered by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and published at the Spring Forecast. |
|
Agriculture: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Victoria Atkins (Conservative - Louth and Horncastle) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether an impact assessment was carried out on changing the Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property to £2.5million. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Compared to Budget 2025, the expected number of estates claiming agricultural property relief (including those also claiming business property relief) affected by the reforms in 2026-27 halves from 375 to 185. Around 85% of estates claiming agricultural property relief in 2026-27, including those that also claim for business property relief, are forecast to pay no more inheritance tax on their estates under these changes.
Excluding estates only holding shares designated as ‘not listed’ on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, the reforms are also now expected to result in up to 220 estates across the UK only claiming business property relief paying more inheritance tax in 2026-27. This is a reduction from up to 325 such estates forecast to pay more at Budget 2025. This means just over 80% of such estates making claims are forecast to not pay any more inheritance tax.
Further information is available in the updated Tax Impact and Information Note (TIIN) which was published on 9 January: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief.
As is normal practice, the Exchequer cost of these changes will be considered by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and published at the Spring Forecast. |
|
Agriculture: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Victoria Atkins (Conservative - Louth and Horncastle) Thursday 15th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate her Department has made of the number of estates that will pay additional inheritance after the threshold changes to £2.5million from April 2026 who claim a) only Agricultural Property Relief b) only Business Property Relief and c) both Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Compared to Budget 2025, the expected number of estates claiming agricultural property relief (including those also claiming business property relief) affected by the reforms in 2026-27 halves from 375 to 185. Around 85% of estates claiming agricultural property relief in 2026-27, including those that also claim for business property relief, are forecast to pay no more inheritance tax on their estates under these changes.
Excluding estates only holding shares designated as ‘not listed’ on the markets of recognised stock exchanges, the reforms are also now expected to result in up to 220 estates across the UK only claiming business property relief paying more inheritance tax in 2026-27. This is a reduction from up to 325 such estates forecast to pay more at Budget 2025. This means just over 80% of such estates making claims are forecast to not pay any more inheritance tax.
Further information is available in the updated Tax Impact and Information Note (TIIN) which was published on 9 January: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief.
As is normal practice, the Exchequer cost of these changes will be considered by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and published at the Spring Forecast. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Jan 2026, 3:44 p.m. - House of Commons "Right. We now come to the urgent question. So, Secretary of State Victoria Atkins. " Jess Phillips MP, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Birmingham Yardley, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
5 Jan 2026, 3:47 p.m. - House of Commons " Victoria Atkins. granting this first urgent question of 2026 and what a way to open the New Year with yet another government U-turn. But where is the " Rt Hon Victoria Atkins MP (Louth and Horncastle, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Jan 2026, 10:52 p.m. - House of Commons "come to amendment three to schedule 12, which has been selected for separate decision. I call Victoria Atkins to move amendment three " Division: Finance (No. 2) Bill, Committee, Clause 62 Stand Part - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Jan 2026, 1:56 p.m. - House of Commons " I call the shadow Secretary of State, Victoria Atkins. >> Thank you. >> Madam Deputy Speaker, and may I thank the Secretary of State for advance copy of her statement? " Rt Hon Victoria Atkins MP (Louth and Horncastle, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Clause 1
211 speeches (38,370 words) Monday 12th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Dan Tomlinson (Lab - Chipping Barnet) Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins) wishes to continue to hector me from a sedentary position - Link to Speech 2: Gareth Davies (Con - Grantham and Bourne) Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins). - Link to Speech |
|
Rural Fuel Duty Relief
39 speeches (9,197 words) Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury Mentions: 1: James Wild (Con - North West Norfolk) Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins), the shadow Environment Secretary, has been - Link to Speech |
|
Rural Communities
205 speeches (25,787 words) Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Mentions: 1: Angela Eagle (Lab - Wallasey) Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins) supported that element. [Interruption.] - Link to Speech |
|
Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief
153 speeches (13,504 words) Monday 5th January 2026 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: John Whittingdale (Con - Maldon) Friend the Member for Louth and Horncastle (Victoria Atkins) on the day that the House rose for Christmas - Link to Speech |