Debates between Mike Freer and Angus Brendan MacNeil during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Public Service Pensions Bill

Debate between Mike Freer and Angus Brendan MacNeil
Tuesday 4th December 2012

(11 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Angus Brendan MacNeil Portrait Mr MacNeil
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In respect of this Bill and the commitment to public sector pensions, what change in GDP are we likely to see?

Mike Freer Portrait Mike Freer
- Hansard - -

I am not qualified to judge that. I am not an economist, so I do not have information about the impact on GDP. It might be appropriate to ask the Economic Secretary that question, however.

--- Later in debate ---
Mike Freer Portrait Mike Freer
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend makes a good point. The pensions time bomb is not only to do with the fact that people are making insufficient provision; it is also about there being insufficient taxpayers to make up the gap between the contributions made by employer and employee and that gap having to be made up from general taxation. There are two parts of the time bomb, therefore. Unless accurate information is provided on pensions, people will not be able to make the appropriate decisions.

Angus Brendan MacNeil Portrait Mr MacNeil
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman give way again?

Mike Freer Portrait Mike Freer
- Hansard - -

As long as the intervention is not a question about GDP.

Angus Brendan MacNeil Portrait Mr MacNeil
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In terms of the provisions in the Bill, the House of Commons Library informs us that this time bomb will be cut from 1.6% of GDP to 1.5% of GDP.

Mike Freer Portrait Mike Freer
- Hansard - -

I am not sure what point the hon. Gentleman is making. After our debate, I may have to check whether I have said something that I cannot remember saying, and I apologise that I cannot respond to that point at present.

The House spends a huge amount of time regulating. The Food Labelling (Nutrition Information) (England) Regulations 2009 spell out in considerable detail the information that must be on food labels. The labels specify for consumers the fibre content, edible carbohydrate polymers, synthetic carbohydrates, salt content, kilojoules and calories, sugar content, fatty acids of trans fatty acids, yet when we ask people to make choices about their pensions, which is one of the biggest decisions of their life, we give them no information at all. I urge the Economic Secretary to go further by ensuring accurate information is included in our pension statements.