General Aviation (Persons on Board, Flight Information and Civil Penalties) Regulations 2024

Debate between Lord Young of Cookham and Lord Gascoigne
Tuesday 30th January 2024

(3 months ago)

Grand Committee
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Gascoigne Portrait Lord Gascoigne (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I confirm that. I sought that clarity for myself. You are correct; it is only military personnel on military flights who will be exempt.

Lord Young of Cookham Portrait Lord Young of Cookham (Con)
- Hansard - -

Could my noble friend write to me on the issue I raised about the anomaly between travelling from England to Northern Ireland and Northern Ireland back to England?

Lord Gascoigne Portrait Lord Gascoigne (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I appreciate that. I absolutely will.

To conclude, adopting these regulations will deliver significant border security benefits to Border Force and other law enforcement partners, ensuring that we have a greater awareness of all individuals intending to travel to or from the UK and that we can prevent the travel of certain individuals where it is in the public interest to do so. Therefore, I commend the regulations to the Committee once more.

Housing: New Homes Target

Debate between Lord Young of Cookham and Lord Gascoigne
Wednesday 17th January 2024

(3 months, 2 weeks ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Gascoigne Portrait Lord Gascoigne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, our ambition of delivering 300,000 homes a year remains. This has always been a stretching ambition, yet there has been strong progress. The four highest rates of annual supply in over 30 years have all been since 2018, including 234,400 homes delivered in 2022-23. Increasing supply further is more difficult due to the economic challenges that we face, and we continue to engage with Homes England, developers and registered providers to understand their delivery charges.

Lord Young of Cookham Portrait Lord Young of Cookham (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I am grateful to my noble friend, but those figures are based on current housing policy. Over Christmas the Government confirmed a major change in housing policy, with targets for local authorities becoming advisory not mandatory; I believe that decision was a mistake, but it has been taken. Since then, 58 local authorities have scrapped or suspended their local plans, with a view to submitting new plans with lower figures for housing. What action can the Government take to ensure that local authorities do not simply succumb to anti-development pressure and so opt out of their obligation to meet the housing shortage?

Lord Gascoigne Portrait Lord Gascoigne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

First, I congratulate my noble friend on once again campaigning on this issue and holding the Government’s feet to the fire. I have heard those figures before, and I reassure my noble friend that the revised NPPF does not allow evasion to build. Local authorities have to make provision for housing and identify sites to deliver homes, and the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act makes it clear that this is a plan-led system. That is exactly why we have recently taken intervention against seven local authorities and will consider using these powers for others that are not making sufficient progress.