Debates between Lord Watson of Invergowrie and Lord Callanan during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Tue 23rd Feb 2016

Trade Union Bill

Debate between Lord Watson of Invergowrie and Lord Callanan
Tuesday 23rd February 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Callanan Portrait Lord Callanan (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I support the Government’s position and these clauses. I strongly associate myself with the remarks of my noble friend Lord King, who put the argument perfectly. We are talking about a taxpayer subsidy for trade union activities, the amount of which we do not know—it may be tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of pounds a year. Nobody knows. It seems to me perfectly equitable to ask local authorities and taxpayer organisations to say how much that subsidy amounts to. It may well be, as my noble friend said—

Lord Watson of Invergowrie Portrait Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Has the noble Lord read the impact assessment on facility time? It has done a calculation. We do not know how, but it at least gives a figure.

Lord Callanan Portrait Lord Callanan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have seen the impact assessment, but I do not think that it is particularly specific about how much is spent. Once the regulations are published we will know how much is spent across the piece. It is a taxpayer subsidy. It may be justified; we do not know. There are some egregious examples of abuse of the facility, which I referred to in my speech at the start of the scrutiny of this legislation, which are well known and have been well publicised.

We spent the previous couple of hours talking about the campaigns that trade unions run and the tens of millions of pounds they spend campaigning against Israel or whatever. That is perfectly proper and it is their right to do that, but they cannot argue on the one hand that it is in their members’ interests to spend lots of money campaigning on these various issues, but on the other that they need a taxpayer subsidy to represent their members in the workspace because they do not have enough money left in their coffers to pay for this facility themselves.