Information between 23rd March 2026 - 12th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 128 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146 |
|
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Watson of Invergowrie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 140 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Watson of Invergowrie speeches from: Curriculum and Assessment Review
Lord Watson of Invergowrie contributed 1 speech (528 words) Thursday 26th March 2026 - Grand Committee |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Multi-academy Trusts: Pay
Asked by: Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 8th April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 11 March (HL14898), what assessment they have made of the cost to the public of multi academy trust chief executives pay in comparison to similar roles in the maintained school sector. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The responsibilities of multi-academy trust chief executives are not directly comparable to those of leaders in the maintained sector. The department is clear that executive pay must be justifiable, transparent, evidence-based and reflect individual responsibility. Trustees should adhere to these principles in setting pay, supported by our guidance and advice. We are taking steps to respond to instances where we see high salaries compared to peers. This includes tightening the academy trust handbook (ATH) by requiring executive pay increases to be proportionate and justified, to prevent excessive increases for individuals carrying out broadly similar roles. The department reviews trusts’ annual accounts to identify trusts with outlying levels of executive pay and engages with them to ensure compliance with the requirements of the ATH. |
|
Special Educational Needs
Asked by: Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour - Life peer) Friday 10th April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have issued guidance to local authorities in England about special school expansion and historical special educational needs and disability deficits; and if so, whether they will publish it. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The department has issued guidance relevant to special school expansion in high needs provision capital allocations. This sets out how councils should assess need, plan delivery routes for new capacity, and, where appropriate, expand or refurbish existing special schools, while also strengthening mainstream inclusion through inclusion bases. Guidance on Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) deficits has also been published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as part of the Local Government Finance Settlement. The explanatory note confirms that High Needs Stability Grant payments, covering up to ninety per cent of high needs related DSG deficits accrued up to the end of the 2025/26 financial year, will only be released once a Local Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Reform Plan has been approved. This requirement was reiterated in the material circulated alongside the Local SEND Reform Plan commission. All documents are available on GOV.UK.
|
|
Schools: Standards
Asked by: Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour - Life peer) Friday 10th April 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the success of Government initiatives launched between 2010 and 2024 in narrowing the attainment gap in schools. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Despite the efforts of dedicated staff, our school system is not serving all children well, with unacceptable disparities in attainment existing across all phases of education and all areas of the country. Disadvantaged children, especially white working-class children, and those with special educational needs and disabilities are not succeeding as they should. The attainment gap between disadvantaged pupils and all other pupils remains high and persistent at both primary and secondary. The ‘Every Child Achieving and Thriving’ white paper establishes the department’s plan to improve the outcomes of all children and young people. When children born under this government finish secondary school, it is our ambition that all children achieve higher standards and the disadvantage gap will be halved, equating to 30,000 more disadvantaged young people passing their English and maths GCSEs than today. To deliver this we will provide family support to help more disadvantaged children arrive at reception school ready, strengthen teacher recruitment and retention, broaden the curriculum and offer high-quality enrichment opportunities. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 3:45 p.m. Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 3:45 p.m. Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |