Debates between Lord Swire and Lord Beamish during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Mon 29th Jan 2018
Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill [Lords]
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons

Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Bill [Lords]

Debate between Lord Swire and Lord Beamish
Lord Swire Portrait Sir Hugo Swire (East Devon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that when we are considering introducing a new element of flexibility into service in the armed forces, we should look again at the maximum enlistment time? Although the military have moved towards extending the retirement age in view of our ageing population, perhaps it is time to revisit that as well. People who are well into their 60s, and even 70s, are quite capable of doing some of the modern jobs in the armed forces, which would not have been the case 20 or 30 years ago.

Lord Beamish Portrait Mr Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think it is a fact of life that the pool of 18-year-olds is becoming smaller. I hope the right hon. Gentleman was not suggesting that the hon. Member for Beckenham (Bob Stewart) should be brought out of retirement; I do not know whether that would be a good thing or a bad thing for the armed forces, but it would certainly be interesting for them. However, he has raised an interesting point. When I was a Defence Minister, people who could have made a further contribution were leaving the forces in their early to mid-50s, for reasons connected with, for instance, pensions. Given that that pool of 18-year-olds is getting smaller, we should also revisit the idea of recruitment from Commonwealth countries, which has been successful in the past. It has made a tremendous contribution to our nation’s defence over the last few years.