Information between 4th March 2026 - 24th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Swire voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Swire speeches from: Onshore Wind Farms
Lord Swire contributed 1 speech (68 words) Monday 23rd March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Lord Swire speeches from: Rail Infrastructure Resilience: Storms and Floods
Lord Swire contributed 1 speech (136 words) Thursday 19th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Lord Swire speeches from: Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion
Lord Swire contributed 1 speech (123 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Lord Swire speeches from: Crown Estate: Wales
Lord Swire contributed 1 speech (75 words) Monday 9th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Foxes: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have any guidance or advice for members of the public to deal with foxes that are ill or have mange. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) This is a devolved matter and the information provided therefore relates to England only.
Members of the public are advised not to feed foxes, regardless of whether they are ill, because it can be detrimental for their health and change their natural behaviours, increasing potential for pathogen transmission.
The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health advise that whilst S. scabiei infestations (which in non-humans is referred to as ‘sarcoptic mange’) is contagious among foxes, there are few confirmed reports of mange being passed to dogs and little evidence to suggest outbreaks amongst domestic pets. The UK Health Security Agency advise that mange transmission between humans and animals has not been reported in the UK.
Animals with sarcoptic mange should be treated by a veterinarian but as foxes are wild animals, no one is responsible for seeking treatment for them and they can be dealt with by local landowners and vets as considered to be appropriate.
However, any suspicion of a notifiable disease such as rabies or influenza of avian origin in mammals must be reported immediately by calling 03000 200 301 in England. |
|
Foxes: Urban Areas
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they consider any increase in urban fox populations to constitute a health or environmental risk to the public. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) This is a devolved matter and the information provided therefore relates to England only.
Whilst there may have been an increase in the number of urban areas with resident foxes, we are not aware of an increased health or environmental risk to the public.
The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health has published guidance which indicates that the risk of catching an infection from a fox in the UK is very low and that whilst there may be a health risk if a person comes into direct contact with fox faeces, this can be reduced with appropriate hygiene.
Members of the public are advised not to feed foxes because it can be detrimental for their health and change their natural behaviours, increasing potential for pathogen transmission. |
|
Foxes: Greater London
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with local authorities about any increase in the number of foxes in London. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government has not had any discussions with local authorities about the number of foxes in London.
Foxes are not protected for conservation purposes in England, and the owner or occupier of the property can decide whether to control them. Local authorities do not have a statutory responsibility to control them.
In conjunction with Government advice, the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health published guidance on the management of urban foxes for the benefit of local authorities, pest controllers and the public as part of their public health and protection resources. |
|
Foxes: Greater London
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of any increase in the number of foxes in London. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government has not specifically assessed fox numbers in London.
In 2018, Natural England published the “Review of the Population and Conservation Status of British Mammals” which included an assessment of the fox population size and status in Britain; this was not specific to London.
In 2018, the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) co-authored research which measured fox group density in urban areas, which included London. Whilst this showed a general increase in the number of urban areas with resident foxes, fox density was not specifically higher in London than that of some other cities and no direct analysis has been carried out. |
|
Palestine: Aid Workers
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 17th March 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of reports of the killing of Palestinian aid workers near Rafah in March 2025. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) I refer the the Noble Lord to the answer provided on 9 June 2025 in response to question HC56774 which, for ease of reference, is reproduced below: We are appalled by repeated reports of mass casualty incidents, in which Palestinians have been killed when trying to access aid sites in Gaza. Desperate civilians who have endured 20 months of war should never face the risk of death or injury to simply feed themselves and their families. We call for an immediate and independent investigation into these events, and for the perpetrators to be held to account. Israel must immediately allow the UN and aid partners to safely deliver all types of aid at scale to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity. |
|
Government Departments: Communication
Asked by: Lord Swire (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 18th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 26 February (HL14633), whether they will publish the (1) relevant stakeholders they consulted, and (2) standard protocols they used, to produce the updated government branding guidance. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The guidance was developed and agreed upon by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Number 10.
There are no plans to discontinue the use of "His Majesty's Government". This term continues to be used on relevant official communications and records, and this will not change.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
23 Mar 2026, 6:38 p.m. - House of Lords "them. So my Lord Swire trustees consider member views and they must do. They ultimately must balance these against their fiduciary duty " Baroness Sherlock (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |