Lord Stone of Blackheath Portrait

Lord Stone of Blackheath

Non-affiliated - Life peer

Became Member: 29th October 1997


Lord Stone of Blackheath is not an officer of any APPGs Lord Stone of Blackheath is not a member of any APPGs
10 Former APPG Officer Positions
Corporate Responsibility, Crowdfunding and Non-Banking Finance, Egypt, Indian Traditional Sciences, Longevity, Mindfulness, Olympic and Paralympic Games, Vegetarianism and Veganism, Yoga in Society, Zoroastrian
Refreshment Sub Committee
23rd Nov 1999 - 7th Nov 2002


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Lord Stone of Blackheath has voted in 11 divisions, and 10 times against the majority of their Party.

4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 3 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 6 Non-affiliated No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 5 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 4 Non-affiliated No votes vs 6 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Stone of Blackheath voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Non-affiliated No votes vs 10 Non-affiliated Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147
View All Lord Stone of Blackheath Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Ministry of Defence
(1 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Lord Stone of Blackheath has not made any spoken contributions to legislative debate
View all Lord Stone of Blackheath's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Stone of Blackheath, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Stone of Blackheath has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Stone of Blackheath has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 6 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
11th Nov 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to transfer responsibility for policy and governance relating to cannabis-based medicinal products to the Department for Health and Social Care; and what assessment they have made of the impact of that transfer on regulatory barriers, clinical research and patient access through the NHS.

The Home Office is the lead department for controlled drug legislation, whilst the Department of Health and Social Care and its Arm's Length Bodies lead on healthcare and the regulation of medicines. The Government has no plans to change this.

The Department of Health and Social Care and the Home Office work closely with other system partners in developing and reviewing policy on controlled drugs in healthcare, including cannabis-based products for medicinal use (CBPMs).

The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England are taking an evidenced-based approach to the access of CBPMs. Since the law changed in 2018 to allow the lawful access to unlicensed CBPMs, two licensed cannabis-based medicines have been made available for prescribing on the National Health Service for patients with multiple sclerosis or hard to treat epilepsies and tuberous sclerosis, where clinically appropriate. This follows approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

NICE has assessed the available evidence, concluding that there is a clear need for more evidence to support routine prescribing and funding decisions of unlicensed CBPMs. NHS funding decisions follow established procedures that ensure equitable distribution of funding, prioritising those medicines that have proved their safety, quality, and clinical and cost effectiveness.

On the 2 June, the Government asked the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), a statutory independent scientific advisory body that advises the Government on drug-related issues, to review the effect of the 2018 law change, and to look at whether it has had the desired impact, and whether there are any unintended consequences. The Government will carefully consider the ACMD’s advice prior to making any decisions.

Baroness Merron
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
15th Oct 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the cost of prescribed cannabis for medical purposes does not constitute a barrier to access for disabled people.

There are extensive arrangements in place in England to ensure that prescriptions are affordable for everyone. Approximately 89% of prescription items are dispensed free of charge in the community in England, and there are wide range of exemptions from prescription charges already in place for which those with medical conditions may be eligible.

The Department does not make provision for the funding of medicines outside of the National Health Service’s commissioning systems and it remains that the cost of treatments sought privately are the responsibility of patients.

Pricing in the private market is a matter for individual companies and for private providers.

Baroness Merron
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
17th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to support the plant-based by default approach to hospital menus proposed in the letter sent by the Plants First Healthcare Campaign to NHS Trusts and integrated care boards on 16 October, and if so, how.

The National Health Service does not intend to support a default plant-based approach to hospital food. The Government and the NHS understand the importance of patients receiving healthy, nutritious, and balanced food, including fruit, vegetables, and proteins. The NHS’ National Standards for Food and Drink encourage the use of healthier, more sustainable menus that include an increased consumption of fruit, vegetables, and fibre.

Baroness Merron
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
7th Oct 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have considered to use trained and non-active military personnel in NHS accident and emergency departments to utilise their skills to provide rapid triage of patient’s needs.

In April 2024, NHS England launched a drive to recruit armed forces veterans into a range of National Health Service roles. The Step into Health pathway supports members of the armed forces community in connecting to NHS organisations to set up training opportunities, clinical and general work placements, insight days, and application support. More information about the programme is available on the NHS website, in an online only format.

Baroness Merron
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
1st Sep 2025
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of mortgage size and availability upon (1) house prices, (2) rent levels, (3) economic growth, and (4) social housing costs; and what plans, if any, they have to mitigate these impacts.

While Treasury Ministers and officials are regularly in contact with lenders on all aspects of their mortgage business to understand their position and current lending conditions, it is important to note that the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. The rules and regulations that govern mortgage lending are set by regulators that are independent of the Government.

However, the Government recognises the importance of affordability and is committed to building 1.5 million more homes over this Parliament. In the 2025 Spending Review, the Government committed an additional £39 billion to a successor for the Affordable Homes Programme, to be delivered over 10 years starting from 2026-2027. This spending, alongside efforts to reform financial regulation, represent a key part of the Government’s mission to kick start economic growth and support more first-time buyers.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)
13th Dec 2024
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to eliminating National Insurance contributions for employers for each disabled employee who is hired; and what assessment have they made of the effect of this on the level of employment among the working-age disabled population.

In order to repair the public finances and help raise the revenue required to increase funding for public services, the Government has taken the very difficult decision to increase employer National Insurance.

There are a wide range of factors that the Government needs to consider when introducing new tax reliefs, for example whether these support wider Government objectives, or add disproportionate complexity into the tax system. It is likely that a new relief would have to be paid for, at least in part, by increased taxes for other taxpayers or reducing expenditure on public services.

Lord Livermore
Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)