Lord Shutt of Greetland Portrait

Lord Shutt of Greetland

Liberal Democrat - Life peer

Became Member: 12th May 2000

Left House: 30th October 2020 (Death)


Lord Shutt of Greetland is not a member of any APPGs
6 Former APPG memberships
Heritage Rail, Isle of Man (Manx), Norfolk Island, St Helena, Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire, Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire
Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Lords)
16th Dec 2014 - 30th Oct 2020
Audit and Risk Assurance Committee
16th Dec 2014 - 30th Oct 2020
Audit and Risk Committee
16th Dec 2014 - 30th Oct 2020
Audit Committee (Lords)
16th Dec 2014 - 30th Oct 2020
Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 Committee
13th Jun 2019 - 22nd Jun 2020
Regenerating Seaside Towns and Communities Committee
17th May 2018 - 19th Mar 2019
EU Financial Affairs Sub-Committee
12th Jun 2015 - 27th Apr 2017
Inquiries Act 2005 Committee
16th May 2013 - 26th Feb 2014
Parliamentary Privilege (Joint Committee)
9th Jan 2013 - 18th Jun 2013
Refreshment Committee (Lords)
9th Jun 2010 - 20th Jun 2012
Committee of Selection (Lords)
19th May 2005 - 14th May 2012
Liberal Democrat Lords Chief Whip
6th May 2005 - 8th May 2012
Captain of the Queen's Bodyguard of the Yeomen of the Guard (HM Household) (Deputy Chief Whip, House of Lords)
11th May 2010 - 8th May 2012
Lords Spokesperson (Northern Ireland Office)
13th Oct 2010 - 8th May 2012
Procedure and Privileges Committee
15th Jun 2005 - 1st May 2012
Administration and Works Committee (Lords)
7th Jun 2005 - 1st May 2012
Committee for Privileges and Conduct (Lords)
25th May 2005 - 1st May 2012
Joint Committee on Security
24th May 2005 - 1st May 2012
Sub-Committee on Leave of Absence
28th Jun 2011 - 1st May 2012
European Union Committee
19th Nov 2002 - 7th May 2005
Audit Committee (Lords)
13th Nov 2002 - 7th Apr 2005
Audit and Risk Committee
13th Nov 2002 - 7th Apr 2005
Audit and Risk Assurance Committee
13th Nov 2002 - 7th Apr 2005
Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Lords)
13th Nov 2002 - 7th Apr 2005
House of Lords Offices Committee
13th Dec 2000 - 7th Nov 2002


Division Voting information

Lord Shutt of Greetland has voted in 1124 divisions, and 7 times against the majority of their Party.

11 Feb 2015 - Deregulation Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 7 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 50 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 208
29 Jan 2014 - Children and Families Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 28 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 222 Noes - 197
15 Jan 2014 - Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 12 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 31 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 28 Noes - 148
4 Mar 2013 - Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 21 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 33 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 153
8 Nov 2011 - Procedure of the House (Proposal 1) - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 27 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 29 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 233
29 Jun 2010 - House of Lords Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 6 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 29
7 Jul 2009 - Coroners and Justice Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Shutt of Greetland voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 21 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 27 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 141 Noes - 194
View All Lord Shutt of Greetland Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
(19 debate interactions)
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
(18 debate interactions)
Lord Beecham (Labour)
(17 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Northern Ireland Office
(187 debate contributions)
Department for Transport
(60 debate contributions)
Wales Office
(14 debate contributions)
Leader of the House
(13 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Lord Shutt of Greetland's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Shutt of Greetland, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Shutt of Greetland has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Shutt of Greetland has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 14 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
30th Mar 2017
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of the statement in their policy paper, <i>2010 to 2015 government policy: UK Overseas Territories</i>, that the reasonable assistance needs of overseas territories "are a first call on the UK’s international development budget", why the St Helena Council had not been informed, as of 30 March, how much its annual revenue support grant for 2017–18 will be; and what assessment they have made of the impact of the timing of the funding decision on the ability of the Council to make financial plans.

The process to determine the level of UK Government financial support to St Helena for 2017/18 has followed standard DFID procedures. It began during November 2016 when the St Helena Government (SHG) provided budget forecasts and DFID officials visited the island for intense discussions of the budget proposals. Elected Members took an active role throughout these discussions.

A revised budget from SHG in January provided more detailed and prioritised spending projections. Following internal quality assurance Ministers approved the level of DFID’s contribution to the budget on 30 March 2017. This approval was relayed to SHG Officials on 31 March.

Throughout the process DFID officials were in regular contact with their SHG counterparts. Financial Aid makes an important contribution to the long term growth and development of St Helena.

The UK Government has a duty to ensure value for taxpayers’ money as it meets its international commitments.

30th Mar 2017
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, when determining the annual revenue support grant to be allocated to St Helena, how much time is given to the St Helena Council to consider the local taxation that it will need to raise; and what representations they have received regarding the adequacy of the length of time given.

The process to determine the level of UK Government financial support to St Helena for 2017/18 has followed standard DFID procedures. It began during November 2016 when the St Helena Government (SHG) provided budget forecasts and DFID officials visited the island for intense discussions of the budget proposals. Elected Members took an active role throughout these discussions.

A revised budget from SHG in January provided more detailed and prioritised spending projections. Following internal quality assurance Ministers approved the level of DFID’s contribution to the budget on 30 March 2017. This approval was relayed to SHG Officials on 31 March.

Throughout the process DFID officials were in regular contact with their SHG counterparts. Financial Aid makes an important contribution to the long term growth and development of St Helena.

The UK Government has a duty to ensure value for taxpayers’ money as it meets its international commitments.

30th Mar 2017
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what consultation and engagement they have with members of the St Helena Council prior to decisions being made on the amount of UK Government support which will be provided for the forthcoming financial year.

The process to determine the level of UK Government financial support to St Helena for 2017/18 has followed standard DFID procedures. It began during November 2016 when the St Helena Government (SHG) provided budget forecasts and DFID officials visited the island for intense discussions of the budget proposals. Elected Members took an active role throughout these discussions.

A revised budget from SHG in January provided more detailed and prioritised spending projections. Following internal quality assurance Ministers approved the level of DFID’s contribution to the budget on 30 March 2017. This approval was relayed to SHG Officials on 31 March.

Throughout the process DFID officials were in regular contact with their SHG counterparts. Financial Aid makes an important contribution to the long term growth and development of St Helena.

The UK Government has a duty to ensure value for taxpayers’ money as it meets its international commitments.

30th Mar 2017
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the process by which they determine the level of the annual revenue support grant to St Helena.

The process to determine the level of UK Government financial support to St Helena for 2017/18 has followed standard DFID procedures. It began during November 2016 when the St Helena Government (SHG) provided budget forecasts and DFID officials visited the island for intense discussions of the budget proposals. Elected Members took an active role throughout these discussions.

A revised budget from SHG in January provided more detailed and prioritised spending projections. Following internal quality assurance Ministers approved the level of DFID’s contribution to the budget on 30 March 2017. This approval was relayed to SHG Officials on 31 March.

Throughout the process DFID officials were in regular contact with their SHG counterparts. Financial Aid makes an important contribution to the long term growth and development of St Helena.

The UK Government has a duty to ensure value for taxpayers’ money as it meets its international commitments.

5th Jul 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what research they have undertaken as a direct consequence of the recommendations and observations regarding operational limitations set out in paragraphs 7.57–7.82 and 13.133 of the 2005 report by Atkins Management Consultants <i>St Helena Access Feasibility Study: Final Report</i>.

The operational limitations set out in paragraphs 7.57 to 7.67 of the Atkins’ Feasibility Study refer to work undertaken to assess the feasibility of a 1,400 m landing runway. This option was not adopted and the St Helena Airport has landing runways of 1,550 m from the north, and 1,535 m from the south. This addresses the limitation referred to. With regard to cargo provision, the proposed Comair flights were to have carried a minimum of one tonne of air freight, and the St Helena Government has already entered into a contract for sea freight on a commercial basis.

Paragraphs 7.68 to 7.81 concern the procurement of an air service which was undertaken through competitive tender in 2014 and resulted in the appointment of Comair to provide scheduled services.

Paragraphs 7.82 and 13.113 both refer to the requirement for flight trials to be carried out. Flight trials were undertaken on 2 May 2007 and concluded that turbulence at the North and South ends of the runway was acceptable.

18th May 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of the delay in opening the new airport on St Helena, whether the ship RMS St Helena will continue to operate beyond the advertised finishing date of 15 July.

DFID is currently in discussion with the St Helena Government to finalise arrangements for the extension of the RMS St Helena beyond July 2016.

18th May 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government when they now expect the new airport on St Helena to be opened.

There is no confirmed date for the commencement of scheduled services into St Helena airport. DFID is working closely with all interested parties to open the airport as soon as possible.

13th Feb 2020
To ask Her Majesty's Government, following the announcement that some railway lines closed in 1963 will be reopened, (1) how much track mileage is to be re-opened for passenger traffic on lines presently in place or used only for freight; (2) how much track mileage is to be re-opened for passenger traffic where track has been removed; and (3) how many stations are to be re-opened on lines presently used for passengers, in the next (a) five, and (b) 10, years.

The volume of railway lines and stations that will be re-opened through the £500m investment, being made during this Government and in subsequent years, will depend on the costs and value for money of qualifying schemes. The Secretary of State is inviting MPs to work with local authorities and community groups to come forward with proposals to explore.

25th Jan 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the announcement by the Secretary of State for Transport on 29 November that the Stagecoach–Virgin partnership would cease to operate the East Coast Rail franchise in 2020, whether they expect that the commitments in the original franchise that were due to be met before 2020 will continue to be met; and in particular, whether they expect (1) direct services from Middlesbrough to London, (2) two-hourly direct weekday services between Bradford, Harrogate, Lincoln and London, and (3) new direct peak-time services between Huddersfield and London, to be established by May 2019.

We are in discussions with Stagecoach to ensure the needs of passengers and taxpayers will be met in the short term whilst laying the foundations for introduction of the East Coast Partnership from 2020.

We expect to provide additional services between Lincoln, Harrogate, Bradford and London from May 2019. It remains our intention to deliver additional services to Middlesbrough and Huddersfield. Virgin Trains East Coast has contingent rights to run services from London to Middlesbrough from May 2020 and firm rights from May 2021.

1st Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the statement by the Secretary of State for Transport, Mr Patrick McLoughlin, on 25 June (HC Deb, col 1068) about Network Rail in respect of the trans-Pennine route that "current work on electrification will be paused because we need to be much more ambitious for that route" , whether their plans for electrification are to be combined with their ambitions for High Speed 3; and, if so, when they expect electrification to take place.

Electrification of the NorthTranspennine line east of Stalybridge is paused pending receipt of Sir Peter Hendy's re-planning proposals this autumn. This is a pause, not a stop, to ensure that it happens at the right time to deliver the most benefit. The government’s enhancements programme is ambitious and stretching and it needs to be re-planned to ensure it remains deliverable and affordable. The replan should take into consideration the plans for the Northern Powerhouse / TransNorth to ensure that we are delivering the best solution overall.

1st Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government why their policy to pause rail electrification was not reflected in the debate in the House on 17 June on transport in the north of England in the context of the Minister's comment on the relationship between electrification and Government's northern powerhouse aspirations.

The delay to Transpennine electrification was already known, and therefore I didn’t specifically mention the delay in my opening. As it was in the public domain, several Lords referenced the delay in their speeches. I acknowledged the concerns about the delay in my closing speech and have written to the Lords in more detail to address their concerns.

1st Jul 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the statement by the Secretary of State for Transport, Mr Patrick McLoughlin, on 25 June (HC Deb, cols 1067–8), how long the pause is expected to last before the TransPennine rail line is electrified.

Electrification of the TransPennine line east of Stalybridge is paused pending receipt of Sir Peter Hendy's re-planning proposals this autumn.