Debates between Lord Sharkey and Lord Lawson of Blaby during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill

Debate between Lord Sharkey and Lord Lawson of Blaby
Tuesday 15th October 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Sharkey Portrait Lord Sharkey
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I have two simple questions. One is to do with the innovation objective. Government Amendment 60M states:

“The innovation objective is to promote the development of, and innovation in, payment systems”.

It just occurred to me to ask whether there is any example of a regulator successfully promoting innovation. I would be interested to hear the Minister’s reply to that.

Lord Lawson of Blaby Portrait Lord Lawson of Blaby
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It would be an innovation.

Lord Sharkey Portrait Lord Sharkey
- Hansard - -

An innovation regulator.

Lord Lawson of Blaby Portrait Lord Lawson of Blaby
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, it would be an innovation.

Lord Sharkey Portrait Lord Sharkey
- Hansard - -

Government Amendment 60U is headed, “Power to require disposal of interest in payment system”. New subsection (2) states:

“The power conferred … may be exercised only if the Payment Systems Regulator is satisfied that, if the power is not exercised, there is likely to be a restriction or distortion of competition in—

(a) the market for payment systems, or

(b) a market for services provided by payment systems”.

How is that a remedy for anything? When it comes to divestment or disposal, is it the Government’s notion that someone will pick up the shares that have been disposed of; and, if so, who will it be? What would be the incentive for anyone to pick them up?