Information between 25th March 2025 - 24th May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Calendar |
---|
Thursday 1st May 2025 Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Short debate - Grand Committee Subject: Improving access to banking and finance for small businesses View calendar - Add to calendar |
Division Votes |
---|
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 46 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 185 |
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 238 Noes - 156 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 162 |
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 126 |
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 127 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 165 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 172 |
26 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill) - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 151 |
26 Mar 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 185 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 143 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 129 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 148 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 2 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216 |
30 Apr 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 157 |
30 Apr 2025 - Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 54 Noes - 124 |
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 125 |
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 62 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 168 |
19 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 118 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Sharkey speeches from: Small Businesses: Access to Banking
Lord Sharkey contributed 2 speeches (1,494 words) Thursday 1st May 2025 - Grand Committee |
Written Answers |
---|
Rare Diseases: National Clinical Directors
Asked by: Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 30th April 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will appoint a National Clinical Director for Rare Diseases following the integration of NHS England into the Department of Health and Social Care. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Working under the UK Rare Diseases Framework, the Government is committed to improving the lives of those living with rare diseases. NHS England and the Department are strongly supportive of clinical leadership and recognise the critical need to incorporate clinical expertise into our work. The national clinical directors are a key part of this approach and play an important role in policy development and implementation. We are currently in the initial phases of scoping and designing a new integrated Department that aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our healthcare system. As part of this process, we are carefully considering the future role of national clinical directors. While no specific decisions have been made yet, we are open to considering the benefit of appointing a National Clinical Director for Rare Diseases following the integration of NHS England into the Department, subject to funding arrangements. |
Health Services
Asked by: Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 6th May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the commissioning of specialised services is not adversely affected by the abolition of NHS England. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) As we take forward the work to integrate NHS England into the Department, we will continue to analyse and assess impacts of all kinds. This will include putting in place plans to ensure continuity of specialised services, with patient safety at the forefront of our work. |
Health Services
Asked by: Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Friday 9th May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of refreshed Joint Forward Plans from each integrated care board. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Joint forward plans (JFPs) are produced by integrated care boards (ICBs) and are publicly available on the respective websites of the ICBs. The Government does not hold any central records of these JFPs and there are no plans to place copies of the JFPs in the Library of the House. |
Patients' Forums
Asked by: Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 15th May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they will take to ensure that the abolition of NHS England does not adversely affect the oversight of patient and public involvement in decisions on specialised services delegated to integrated care boards. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England has asked the integrated care boards (ICBs) to act primarily as strategic commissioners of health and care services and to reduce the duplication of responsibilities within their structure, to achieve a 50% cost reduction in their running cost allowance. We expect ICBs to fully deliver on their commissioning responsibilities, including the responsibility to commission some of the specialised services. Furthermore, ICBs have a legal duty to involve patients and their carers and/or representatives in the planning of services, as well as proposals and decisions that have an impact on services. ICBs are required to set out how they plan to execute this duty in their joint forward plans. NHS England provided additional guidance to ICBs, National Health Service trusts, and NHS foundation trusts on 1 April 2025, where ICBs were tasked with developing plans by the end of May setting out how they will manage their resources to deliver across their priorities. NHS England will be working closely with ICBs to support the development of these plans, ensuring that their implementation reduces duplication and supports patient care. In his letter to ICBs, Sir Jim Mackay committed to greater transparency and moving back to a fair shares allocation policy over time. |
Health Services
Asked by: Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 15th May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will ensure that staff transferred from NHS England to integrated care boards to support the commissioning of specialised services are protected from headcount reductions. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England has asked the integrated care boards (ICBs) to act primarily as strategic commissioners of health and care services and to reduce the duplication of responsibilities within their structure, to achieve a 50% cost reduction in their running cost allowance. We expect ICBs to fully deliver on their commissioning responsibilities, including the responsibility to commission some of the specialised services. Furthermore, ICBs have a legal duty to involve patients and their carers and/or representatives in the planning of services, as well as proposals and decisions that have an impact on services. ICBs are required to set out how they plan to execute this duty in their joint forward plans. NHS England provided additional guidance to ICBs, National Health Service trusts, and NHS foundation trusts on 1 April 2025, where ICBs were tasked with developing plans by the end of May setting out how they will manage their resources to deliver across their priorities. NHS England will be working closely with ICBs to support the development of these plans, ensuring that their implementation reduces duplication and supports patient care. In his letter to ICBs, Sir Jim Mackay committed to greater transparency and moving back to a fair shares allocation policy over time. |
Health Services
Asked by: Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 15th May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the commissioning of specialised services is not adversely affected by the requirement for integrated care boards to reduce their running costs by 50 per cent. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England has asked the integrated care boards (ICBs) to act primarily as strategic commissioners of health and care services and to reduce the duplication of responsibilities within their structure, to achieve a 50% cost reduction in their running cost allowance. We expect ICBs to fully deliver on their commissioning responsibilities, including the responsibility to commission some of the specialised services. Furthermore, ICBs have a legal duty to involve patients and their carers and/or representatives in the planning of services, as well as proposals and decisions that have an impact on services. ICBs are required to set out how they plan to execute this duty in their joint forward plans. NHS England provided additional guidance to ICBs, National Health Service trusts, and NHS foundation trusts on 1 April 2025, where ICBs were tasked with developing plans by the end of May setting out how they will manage their resources to deliver across their priorities. NHS England will be working closely with ICBs to support the development of these plans, ensuring that their implementation reduces duplication and supports patient care. In his letter to ICBs, Sir Jim Mackay committed to greater transparency and moving back to a fair shares allocation policy over time. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
High Streets (Built Environment Committee Report)
23 speeches (13,916 words) Tuesday 13th May 2025 - Grand Committee Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Lord Bishop of St Albans (Bshp - Bishops) I made this point in the debate in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, on small businesses a few - Link to Speech |
Small Businesses: Access to Banking
11 speeches (6,425 words) Thursday 1st May 2025 - Grand Committee Mentions: 1: Lord Bishop of St Albans (Bshp - Bishops) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, not only for securing this debate but for an interesting - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Kramer (LD - Life peer) My Lords, let me begin by saying that I totally sign up to all that my noble friend Lord Sharkey said - Link to Speech 3: Lord Altrincham (Con - Excepted Hereditary) My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, for bringing forward this debate and for his continued - Link to Speech 4: Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, for securing this debate and for his thoughtful - Link to Speech |
Whiplash Injury Compensation
11 speeches (2,690 words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Jess Brown-Fuller (LD - Chichester) balanced approach.During debate on the Civil Liability Act 2018, my colleagues in the other place, Lord Sharkey - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Monday 14th April 2025
Declarations of interest - Financial Services Regulation Committee Declaration of Interests as of 14 April 2025 Financial Services Regulation Committee Found: Lord Sharkey No relevant interests to declare. |
Thursday 10th April 2025
Written Evidence - British Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (BVCA) SCG0053 - FCA and PRA’s secondary competitiveness and growth objective FCA and PRA’s secondary competitiveness and growth objective - Financial Services Regulation Committee Found: Secondly, the Lord Sharkey also asked me for information on metrics that are not currently measured |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 30th April 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 7th May 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 14th May 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 21st May 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 11th June 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |