Lord Sharkey - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Sharkey

Information between 3rd January 2026 - 23rd January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 37 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 42 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 47 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 161
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 162
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Sharkey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150

Speeches
Lord Sharkey speeches from: Pension Schemes Bill Lord Sharkey contributed 5 speeches (1,276 words) Committee stage Monday 12th January 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Work and Pensions

Lord Sharkey mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Pension Schemes Bill 98 speeches (27,030 words) Committee stage Monday 12th January 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: None this section to the super-affirmative procedure, as defined in another amendment in the name of Lord Sharkey - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con - Life peer) I will speak simply to support the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey. - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Sherlock (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, for introducing his amendments, and to all noble - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Sherlock (Lab - Life peer) I am sure he has not missed the fact that the amendments put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, - Link to Speech

Parliamentary Debates

Pension Schemes Bill
98 speeches (27,030 words)
Committee stage
Monday 12th January 2026 - Grand Committee
Department for Work and Pensions

Mentions:
1: None this section to the super-affirmative procedure, as defined in another amendment in the name of Lord Sharkey - Link to Speech
2: Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con - Life peer) I will speak simply to support the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey. - Link to Speech
3: Baroness Sherlock (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, for introducing his amendments, and to all noble - Link to Speech
4: Baroness Sherlock (Lab - Life peer) I am sure he has not missed the fact that the amendments put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey, - Link to Speech

Lord Sharkey - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 21st January 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 28th January 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 4th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:05am: Oral evidence Chris Giles - Journalist at Financial Times At 11:15am: Oral evidence Professor Arthur E. Wilmarth, Jr. View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 11th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Professor Simon Gleeson At 11:00am: Oral evidence Professor Kern Alexander View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 25th February 2026 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK View calendar - Add to calendar

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 8th January 2026 Correspondence - Letter from Lucy Rigby KC MP, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, to Lord Forsyth of Drumlean regarding the Committee’s inquiry into the growth of private markets in the UK following reforms introduced after 2008 (18 December 2025) Financial Services Regulation Committee

Select Committee Inquiry
28 Jan 2026 Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK Financial Services Regulation Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 11 Mar 2026) This inquiry will examine the development of, and proposed regulatory response to, stablecoins in the UK. In particular, the inquiry will examine the extent to which stablecoins might disrupt the traditional models of provision of financial services, including for banking and payments services. The inquiry will also assess the potential opportunities and risks that the growth of stablecoins might have on UK’s financial services sector, and whether the Bank of England and FCA’s proposed regulatory frameworks provide measured and proportionate responses to these risks.

Select Committee Inquiry

28 Jan 2026
Growth and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the UK
Financial Services Regulation Committee (Select)

Submit Evidence (by 11 Mar 2026)

This inquiry will examine the development of, and proposed regulatory response to, stablecoins in the UK. In particular, the inquiry will examine the extent to which stablecoins might disrupt the traditional models of provision of financial services, including for banking and payments services. The inquiry will also assess the potential opportunities and risks that the growth of stablecoins might have on UK’s financial services sector, and whether the Bank of England and FCA’s proposed regulatory frameworks provide measured and proportionate responses to these risks.