Debates between Lord Scriven and Lord Bethell during the 2017-2019 Parliament

NHS: Babylon’s GP at Hand App

Debate between Lord Scriven and Lord Bethell
Monday 21st October 2019

(5 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bethell Portrait Lord Bethell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Meetings with Ministers are published. I am happy to check with the department to see whether there has been any oversight, and I will share any response with the Member.

Lord Scriven Portrait Lord Scriven (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the big issue with apps and health is that the data used can be used by these private companies in a way that the Government cannot track, and that data—particularly of individual patients—is used in a way they do not control. In light of this, what new regulations will be brought forward, particularly on patient consent to the use of individual data?

Lord Bethell Portrait Lord Bethell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The use of patient data by the NHS, its contractors and providers is highly regulated. The CQC regulates Babylon as it does every other GP practice, and it is subject to exactly the same rules as every other privately owned GP outfit in the country.

Health Infrastructure Plan

Debate between Lord Scriven and Lord Bethell
Monday 30th September 2019

(5 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Bethell Portrait Lord Bethell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord makes a powerful point which opens up one’s thoughts about how this infrastructure build is going to be implemented and the opportunities for applying the latest technology not just in energy, but in the way the employment environment can be shaped for NHS employees, travel, biodiversity and the range of challenges we face as a society. This infrastructure plan will be a massive opportunity to put to work ideas such as those that he talked about. I do not know the work of Modern Energy Partners, but I will be sure to pass it on to the Minister.

Lord Scriven Portrait Lord Scriven (LD)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, existing capital budgets cover not just equipment and buildings but research and development so, every time capital budgets are raided to bring revenue budgets into balance, we see not only a further backlog in buildings, equipment and maintenance but less for research and development. If the Government are now so assured that the amount going into both revenue and capital is better, what accountancy rules will they bring about to ensure that there will not be mass raiding of capital budgets to prop up revenue budgets? If there are not going to be changes, how can we have any guarantee that capital is not going to be raided for revenue in future?

Lord Bethell Portrait Lord Bethell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord for a detailed question. I cannot possibly pretend to know the details of the accounting rules that govern these kinds of arrangements, but I will be glad to write to reassure him on this matter. All I can say is that by designing and publishing a detailed long-term plan, the scope for fiddling around and moving money from one bucket to another is greatly diminished.