Lord Rowe-Beddoe Portrait

Lord Rowe-Beddoe

Crossbench - Life peer

Became Member: 15th June 2006

Left House: 15th November 2023 (Death)


Lord Rowe-Beddoe is not a member of any APPGs
1 Former APPG membership
Latin America
Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee)
19th Jul 2017 - 19th Jan 2022
Finance Bill Sub-Committee
4th Nov 2019 - 22nd Jan 2021
Procedure and Privileges Committee
8th Jun 2015 - 1st Jul 2019
Citizenship and Civic Engagement Committee
29th Jun 2017 - 28th Mar 2018
Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee)
25th May 2016 - 27th Apr 2017
Economic Affairs Committee
16th May 2012 - 30th Mar 2015
Administration and Works Committee (Lords)
25th Nov 2009 - 14th May 2014
Finance Bill Sub-Committee
8th Jan 2014 - 11th Mar 2014
Finance Bill Sub-Committee
4th Dec 2012 - 5th Mar 2013
Barnett Formula Committee
10th Dec 2008 - 12th Nov 2009


Division Voting information

Lord Rowe-Beddoe has voted in 698 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Lord Rowe-Beddoe Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
(4 debate interactions)
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson (Transport)
(4 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Wales Office
(20 debate contributions)
Home Office
(7 debate contributions)
Ministry of Justice
(2 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Lord Rowe-Beddoe's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Rowe-Beddoe, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Rowe-Beddoe has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Rowe-Beddoe has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 4 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
15th Jan 2018
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Sugg on 15 January, whether the use of cycle lanes can be limited to peak commuting times of the day.

The provision of cycling infrastructure, including cycle lanes, is a matter for local traffic authorities. Mandatory cycle lanes, indicated by a solid white line, can operate at all times or at specific times of day. It is for the local authority to decide on hours of operation.

24th Nov 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the answer by Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon on 23 November (HL Deb, col 468), whether they will consider introducing a small annual licence fee and mandatory registration of all bicycles.

The Government has no plans to introduce such measures.

2nd Dec 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the reply by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth on 30 November (HL Deb, col 931–3) about the non-devolution of the long-haul element of air passenger duty to Wales, how they differentiate between Edinburgh and Newcastle, and Cardiff and Bristol with respect to state aid.

As set out in the St David’s Day Agreement, the government is considering the case and options for devolving powers to the Welsh Assembly over air passenger duty (APD). Any next steps pursued by the government will comply with EU State aid rules on tax devolution.


Discussion of State aid is relevant to options we are considering to mitigate the effects of APD devolution with respect to English airports. In July, the government published a discussion paper on several options to do this. We will respond to the consultation and announce next steps in due course.

26th Apr 2016
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their estimate of costs incurred by them in connection with the recent visit of the President of the United States.

It is long established Government policy not to comment upon matters of personal protective security and their associated costs. Disclosure of such information could compromise the integrity of those arrangements and affect the security of the individuals concerned.