Information between 21st May 2024 - 7th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 194 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 208 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 188 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 198 |
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 179 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 192 |
23 May 2024 - Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 108 Conservative No votes vs 13 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 111 |
11 Sep 2024 - Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment Regulations 2024 - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 132 |
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 166 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 139 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 132 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 59 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 124 |
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Reay voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 128 |
Written Answers |
---|
Gender Recognition
Asked by: Lord Reay (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 4th November 2024 Question To ask His Majesty's Government, following the Financial Ombudsman Service decision of September in relation to MoneySuperMarket, what is the policy position of (1) the Office for Equality and Opportunity and (2) the Equality and Human Rights Commission on whether (a) gender identity and (b) non-binary status are protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Equality Act 2010 (‘the Act’) provides protection against discrimination, harassment and victimisation based on the following protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. The Government is proud of the Act and the rights and protections it affords, and we are committed to upholding this important piece of legislation. The Equality and Human Rights Commission is independent of the Government, therefore, we cannot speak on its behalf. |
Financial Services: Equality
Asked by: Lord Reay (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the effect of the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority's proposals on mandatory equality reporting on the competitiveness of financial services companies operating in the United Kingdom. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) The government has no plans to reform the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), but it is committed to working with the FCA to ensure that it is supporting the government’s growth mission. Effective, proportionate regulation is key to a thriving UK economy and delivering the government’s mission to drive the inclusive growth and international competitiveness of the UK’s financial services sector.
The FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) are non-governmental bodies which are independent from the Treasury and have broad powers to make rules in order to advance their statutory objectives. The regulators are required by legislation to carry out their general functions, which include rule-making, in a way that advances their competitiveness and growth objectives.
In line with statutory requirements, the FCA and PRA have included in their consultations an explanation of the compatibility of the proposed rules with their duties, including consideration of the competitiveness and growth objectives.
|
Financial Conduct Authority
Asked by: Lord Reay (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Livermore on 20 September (HL1065), what plans they have, if any, to reform the Financial Conduct Authority to help make the City of London more competitive. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) The government has no plans to reform the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), but it is committed to working with the FCA to ensure that it is supporting the government’s growth mission. Effective, proportionate regulation is key to a thriving UK economy and delivering the government’s mission to drive the inclusive growth and international competitiveness of the UK’s financial services sector.
The FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) are non-governmental bodies which are independent from the Treasury and have broad powers to make rules in order to advance their statutory objectives. The regulators are required by legislation to carry out their general functions, which include rule-making, in a way that advances their competitiveness and growth objectives.
In line with statutory requirements, the FCA and PRA have included in their consultations an explanation of the compatibility of the proposed rules with their duties, including consideration of the competitiveness and growth objectives.
|
Stonewall
Asked by: Lord Reay (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government whether (1) the Bank of England, (2) the Financial Conduct Authority and (3) the Financial Ombudsman Service receive advice from, or participate in, programmes overseen by Stonewall. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) This is a matter for the Bank of England, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) which are independent, non-governmental bodies.
The Bank of England, FCA and FOS will each respond to the Noble Lord by letter, and a copy of these letters will be placed in the Library of the House of Lords. |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Tuesday 5th November 2024
Minutes and decisions - Minutes - 1st Meeting - 11 September 2024 Finance Committee (Lords) Found: Morse (Chair) Baroness Blake of Leeds Baroness Buscombe Earl of Courtown Baroness Goudie Lord |
Tuesday 17th September 2024
Minutes and decisions - Minutes - 5th Meeting - 12 March 2024 Finance Committee (Lords) Found: Morse (Chair) Baroness Buscombe Earl of Courtown Baroness Goudie Lord Kennedy of Southwark Lord |
Parliamentary Research |
---|
House of Lords: Maiden and valedictory speeches, 2022–2024 - LLN-2024-0052
Sep. 19 2024 Found: also sincerely t hank my supporters, the noble baroness, Lady Manningham- Buller, and my noble friend Lord |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 15th October 2024 12:30 p.m. Finance Committee (Lords) - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 11th September 2024 3:45 p.m. Finance Committee (Lords) - Private Meeting View calendar |
Tuesday 22nd October 2024 10 a.m. Finance Committee (Lords) - Private Meeting View calendar |
Tuesday 5th November 2024 10 a.m. Finance Committee (Lords) - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 4th December 2024 3:45 p.m. Finance Committee (Lords) - Private Meeting View calendar |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Friday 6th September 2024
Agendas and papers - Agenda - 1st Meeting - 11 September 2024 Finance Committee (Lords) |
Tuesday 17th September 2024
Minutes and decisions - Minutes - 5th Meeting - 12 March 2024 Finance Committee (Lords) |
Tuesday 5th November 2024
Minutes and decisions - Minutes - 1st Meeting - 11 September 2024 Finance Committee (Lords) |