Information between 23rd November 2025 - 12th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 201 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 82 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 131 Noes - 127 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Randall of Uxbridge voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Randall of Uxbridge speeches from: UK Citizens in Venezuela
Lord Randall of Uxbridge contributed 1 speech (32 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Lord Randall of Uxbridge speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Randall of Uxbridge contributed 3 speeches (950 words) Committee stage part two Thursday 27th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Game: Birds
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to introduce requirements for gamebird shoots in areas in England outside of European sites (1) to have a vet inspect reared gamebirds for signs of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) before release, (2) to report mortality or suspicion of HPAI in released gamebirds, and (3) to remove dead released gamebirds. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Avian Influenza Prevention Zone (AIPZ) currently in force throughout the whole of England was updated to include additional biosecurity measures for game bird operations on 26 August 2025. These measures reflect the specific disease risks associated with the game bird and shooting sector during the gamebird release season and are intended to protect both wild and captive bird populations.
Within the AIPZ, birds must not be put in a release pen if they show signs of avian influenza. Game birds kept in release pens must be checked daily and any birds showing clinical signs suggestive of avian influenza must receive immediate and appropriate attention, including discussing the clinical signs with a veterinary surgeon. Any suspicion of avian influenza must be reported to the Animal and Plant Health Agency immediately. Keepers must also conduct a daily search of the area within and up to a 50-metre radius surrounding the release pen(s) and feeding and watering stations, for carcases of dead game birds and/or dead wild birds. These should be reported to Defra using the online reporting service for dead wild birds. If carcases are not required for avian influenza surveillance, the carcases must be appropriately disposed of (see attached). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Avian Influenza
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the highly pathogen avian influenza risk that released gamebirds pose to (1) wild birds outside of special protection areas, (2) poultry, (3) mammal livestock, and (4) wild mammals, in England. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra, in conjunction with Welsh Government and Scottish Government, commissioned a risk assessment from the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), to further understand the impact game bird releases have on transmission of avian influenza in wild birds, and between wild birds and kept birds in periods of higher than usual levels of avian influenza. This risk assessment is published on gov.uk as part of the ‘Animal diseases: international and UK monitoring’ collection.
Furthermore, a risk assessment of the likely transmission of Avian Influenza from Livestock to Humans was undertaken by Human Animal Infections and Risk Surveillance (HAIRS) group, and concluded that the probability of infection in the UK population is considered very low.
This assessment has informed disease controls. During outbreaks, there are controls on the release of game birds in areas of known high risk. The release of game birds is not permitted in any avian influenza disease control zone, nor are game bird releases permitted while an avian influenza prevention zone, including mandatory housing measures, is in force. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Avian Influenza
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 25th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government how much they have spent on (1) compensation, (2) disinfection of premises, and (3) other costs, associated with avian flu outbreaks at (a) poultry, and (b) game, farms in the 2024–25 season. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Please see costs for the Avian Flu outbreaks in the 2024–25 season (1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025).
Outbreak Year 2024 - 25
Note:
I. The costs to His Majesty's Government are for England total, as Devolved Governments recharged costs.
II. The figures do not include: o the split between poultry and game because data is not disaggregated by these categories o the split between disinfection and other costs because data is not disaggregated by these categories
III. It is possible that some of these costs will change as there may be late submissions of invoices and some data are subject to review and audit. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Drax Power Station: Timber
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the current subsidy arrangement with Drax includes support for burning old growth forest wood in its power station. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Sustainability criteria require biomass to be legally harvested, and comply with any applicable legislation in the countries of origin to protect primary forest and old growth areas. Old growth sources are not excluded as some jurisdictions permit harvesting for valid reasons, such as fire prevention or disease control.
We have not seen evidence that the bioenergy industry drives harvesting decisions as it accepts low-value residues which would otherwise become waste.
Nevertheless, we have introduced an explicit exclusion for primary material harvested in old-growth areas in the new contract to eliminate this risk. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Drax Power Station: Timber
Asked by: Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government whether wood pellets sourced from old growth forests in Canada have been burned in the Drax Power Station in 2024 and 2025. Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) We have not seen evidence that material sourced from old growth forests in Canada has been used for UK power generation and Drax has a policy of not sourcing directly from protected Old Growth Management Areas or Old Growth Deferral Areas in British Columbia.
Nevertheless, we have introduced an explicit exclusion for material harvested in old-growth areas in the new contract to eliminate this risk. Any breaches would result in significant financial penalties and could lead to termination of the contract. This will be enforced by enhanced assurance and audit arrangements. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Crime and Policing Bill
117 speeches (31,707 words) Committee stage part two Thursday 27th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville (LD - Life peer) My Lords, I support Amendment 247A, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Randall of Uxbridge, who has laid - Link to Speech 2: Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bshp - Bishops) My Lords, I too support this amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Randall of Uxbridge. - Link to Speech 3: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Randall of Uxbridge for bringing forward this important - Link to Speech 4: Lord Katz (Lab - Life peer) or—to use the words of the noble Lord, Lord Blencathra—this evil trade.As the noble Lord, Lord Randall of Uxbridge - Link to Speech |