Tax-Free Shopping: Economic Impact
Debate between Lord Pitt-Watson and Earl of Clancarty(1 week, 3 days ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Pitt-Watson (Lab)
I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Meyer. In fact, the Conservative Party did reintroduce this scheme in the Liz Truss mini-Budget. It was withdrawn six weeks later by Jeremy Hunt when he became Chancellor and, when he withdrew it, he suggested that that would save the taxpayer £2 billion per year. Again, I ask if anyone on the Benches opposite can tell me where that £2 billion would come from? As to the evidence that this would be tax raising, there are some reports—I accept that point from the noble Baroness—but the Oxford Economics report was, of course, commissioned by the Association of International Retail and the Centre for Economics and Business research by Global Blue, which is a company that provides VAT refund services. If we are going to have evidence-based policy, I think the numbers that I have been citing to your Lordships are rather better than ones that might be in danger of being policy-based evidence.
The Earl of Clancarty (CB)
My Lords, it is worth pointing out that the VAT retail export scheme is the norm in the EU, and it was withdrawn here in the wake of Brexit. That loss has particularly affected the creative industries, including craft and fashion, as the British Fashion Council points out. To take the wider view, will the creative industries be under particular discussion at the EU-UK summit on 20 November?
Lord Pitt-Watson (Lab)
I am absolutely sure they will. But, to be clear about the evidence here, if we look at the difference in spend by foreign visitors from 2019 to 2024 in the major EU countries and in the UK, we see no evidence that the withdrawal of this scheme has been negative. Britain is actually a little above the average. It is not statistically significant, because it is comparing only five countries, but I really do not think that there is evidence that the withdrawal of this scheme has done great damage, and the scheme comes at some cost.
Hospitality Industry: VAT
Debate between Lord Pitt-Watson and Earl of Clancarty(1 month, 3 weeks ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Pitt-Watson (Lab)
As the noble Lord may be aware, those sorts of rights exist for mayors and other local authorities in almost every other European country. In the UK they will need to consult locally before they introduce any such tax, but many mayors will believe that the extra revenues can raise the economy of their local area and provide better facilities so that the hospitality industry, along with everyone else, will prosper. As I said, this is part of a devolution agenda, but it is one where there will be consultation before any additional charge is introduced. It will be proportionate, of course, in the sense that it is a percentage of the cost, so it would cost more for an expensive hotel than for lower-cost accommodation.
The Earl of Clancarty (CB)
My Lords, picking up on that point, does the Minister agree that a tourist tax spent in the main on arts and culture would be logical, since that is what tourists come here for? If our cultural attractions are properly maintained and developed, that will in turn significantly help the hospitality industry.