Lord Pitt-Watson Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Pitt-Watson

Information between 24th February 2026 - 6th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 43 Noes - 131
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 188
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 152
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 150
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 148
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 178
24 Feb 2026 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 246
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 146
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Pitt-Watson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 139 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145


Written Answers
Company Accounts: Disclosure of Information
Asked by: Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 26th February 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in the light of the joint letter sent by Principles for Responsible Investment and the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change to the CEO of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), dated 16 December 2025, what steps they are taking to ensure that the FRC and other regulators ensure that issuers and auditors apply new guidance set out by the International Accounting Standards Board in Disclosures about Uncertainties in the Financial Statements—Illustrative examples, published on 28 November 2025.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The illustrative examples provide guidance to help preparers meet the mandatory requirements within IFRS Accounting Standards, which are adopted in the UK as UK-adopted international accounting standards. However, application of this guidance does not form part of mandatory requirements and it is ultimately for companies and auditors to decide whether to use the examples. Any FRC engagement with companies and their auditors will be through either reviews of annual reports, or reviews of audits, undertaken as part of its Supervision work.

Company Accounts: Disclosure of Information
Asked by: Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 26th February 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the effectiveness of the guidance by the International Accounting Standards Board Disclosures about Uncertainties in the Financial Statements—Illustrative examples, published on 28 November 2025, in ensuring companies affected by climate change explain to investors the material climate assumptions on which their accounts are drawn up, in such areas as asset valuation, asset lives and contingent liabilities.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The UK Endorsement Board widely consulted with UK stakeholders, including investors and companies, throughout the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) development of the illustrative examples. Feedback, on whether they would support companies in reporting the effects of climate-related, and other, uncertainties in their financial statements, was shared with the IASB and incorporated before finalisation.

The upcoming reporting cycle will clarify whether the guidance has influenced company reporting on such matters.

Company Accounts: Disclosure of Information
Asked by: Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 26th February 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the new guidance by the International Financial Standards Board on the application of existing financial reporting standards, set out by the International Accounting Standards Board in Disclosures about Uncertainties in the Financial Statements—Illustrative examples, published on 28 November 2025.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The UK Endorsement Board widely consulted with UK stakeholders, including investors and companies, throughout the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) development of the illustrative examples. Feedback, on whether they would support companies in reporting the effects of climate-related, and other, uncertainties in their financial statements, was shared with the IASB and incorporated before finalisation.

The upcoming reporting cycle will clarify whether the guidance has influenced company reporting on such matters.

Company Accounts: Disclosure of Information
Asked by: Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour - Life peer)
Thursday 26th February 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of British companies’ and auditors’ readiness to apply the new guidance set out by the International Accounting Standards Board in Disclosures about Uncertainties in the Financial Statements—Illustrative examples, published on 28 November 2025, in their financial reporting this year; and what assessment they have made of the contingency plans that the Financial Reporting Council and other regulators have in place should those companies and auditors fail to apply the new guidance.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The illustrative examples provide guidance to help preparers meet the mandatory requirements within IFRS Accounting Standards, which are adopted in the UK as UK-adopted international accounting standards. However, application of this guidance does not form part of mandatory requirements and it is ultimately for companies and auditors to decide whether to use the examples. Any FRC engagement with companies and their auditors will be through either reviews of annual reports, or reviews of audits, undertaken as part of its Supervision work.