Information between 29th October 2025 - 18th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 193 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 195 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 198 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Patten speeches from: Financial Provision on Divorce
Lord Patten contributed 1 speech (472 words) Monday 10th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Public Inquiries: Costs
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 10th November 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the expenditure incurred by public inquiries in each of the last five years. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Published costs for inquiries can be found on inquiry websites, as well as in the National Archives.
Public Inquiries shed light on injustices of the past, provide a means for victims and survivors to finally have their voices heard, and can help to rebuild trust in national institutions. The Government also recognises that there is growing criticism of the cost of inquiries, and is considering whether there are changes that could enable inquiries to deliver outcomes and enable lessons to be learnt more swiftly and at lower cost. This is a substantial piece of work, led by the Cabinet Office, that will aim to improve how we identify wrongs, and get to the truth more quickly. We will continue to keep Parliament updated on this important subject.
|
|
Planning: Salisbury
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 3rd November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 22 October (HL10990), whether "the settings of Heritage Assets" may include views from a distance, and whether the word "assets" by definition alone includes a setting. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The ‘setting of a heritage asset’ is defined in the glossary of the National Planning Policy Framework. National planning policy seeks to protect the significance of a heritage asset which is defined as deriving not only from a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also from its setting.
|
|
Planning: Salisbury
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 3 November (HL11277), whether the gardens of Leaden Hall fall within the description as part of a nationally significant setting to be protected as defined by the National Planning Policy Framework. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) As set out in the definition of ‘the setting of a heritage asset’ in the National Planning Policy Framework, its extent is not fixed and may change as the asset and its surroundings evolve. It is therefore for the decision maker to decide what the setting of a particular heritage asset is when considering a relevant planning application. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
30 Oct 2025, 1:41 p.m. - House of Lords "and Lord Patten and my former colleague Lord Ashdown, and many others at the time said we must, as " Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Nov 2025, 8:32 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Patten, raised the issue of children very often. Those, as I've " Baroness Levitt, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Nov 2025, 7:52 p.m. - House of Lords "forward this question. I would. Before I start, I'd like to support much of what the noble Lord Patten " Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Nov 2025, 7:52 p.m. - House of Lords "much of what the noble Lord Patten has just said about the importance of children and the fact that they " Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Nov 2025, 7:58 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Patten in relation to children is a good and valid one. Wearing my hat as a marriage foundation. " Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Nov 2025, 12:59 p.m. - House of Lords "and Lord Patten of Barnes, for that matter? Do we need to do more to attract entrepreneurs and investors to come to the UK rather than chase " Debate: Government’s economic and taxation policies on jobs, growth and prosperity. Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Financial Provision on Divorce
33 speeches (8,212 words) Monday 10th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Baroness Butler-Sloss (XB - Life peer) I support much of what the noble Lord, Lord Patten, said about the importance of children and the fact - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia (Con - Life peer) are two professionals —or by people entering a second marriage.The point made by my noble friend Lord Patten - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) On the matters he raised about religious courts, I will have to write to him.The noble Lord, Lord Patten - Link to Speech |
|
Extradition Act 2003 (Amendment to Designations) Order 2025
11 speeches (3,288 words) Thursday 30th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Brinton (LD - Life peer) At the time, the noble Lord, Lord Patten, my former colleague Lord Ashdown and many others said that - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Monday 3rd November 2025
Oral Evidence - Jonathan Hall KC, and Lord Sumption OBE PC, FSA, FRHistS The National Security Strategy - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Lord Patten, what is your take? |
|
Monday 3rd November 2025
Oral Evidence - Isabel Hilton OBE, Lord Patten of Barnes, and MI6 The National Security Strategy - National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Found: Isabel Hilton OBE, Lord Patten of Barnes, and MI6 Oral Evidence |