Information between 15th December 2025 - 24th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178 |
|
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219 |
|
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 169 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 211 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 176 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 157 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
19 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 170 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 261 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Patten voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 159 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Council Tax: Valuation
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 15th December 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the ability of the Valuation Office Agency's automated valuation model to carry out the work needed to the requisite level of accuracy in time for the introduction of the high value council tax surcharge. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) The Valuation Office Agency are developing their approach to the targeted revaluation and will set out more details in due course, following the outcome of the Government's consultation.
When valuing domestic properties, the VOA uses modern technology and industry standard techniques combined with freely available information including sales data, property attribute details and government records.
|
|
Flood Control: York
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 17th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the adequacy of flood defences in York. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Since 2016, the Environment Agency has invested £125 million of government funding on a major upgrade of the engineered defences through York, including walls and flood gates and improvements to the Foss Barrier and pumping station. The defences are designed to protect properties from a flood with a 1% probability of happening in any given year, allowing for the effects of climate change until 2039. Further climate change predictions indicate upper catchment flood alleviation measures will be required to offer York the same standard of protection past 2039. |
|
Army
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government by what date they estimate the army will have "increased lethality ten-fold", as called for in the Strategic Defence Review. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) I refer the Noble Lord to the answer given by the Minister for the Armed forces to Question 79389 on 17 October 2025 in the House of Commons, which remains extant in that the Army will deliver a tenfold increase in lethality by 2035. |
|
Army: Military Exercises
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the army's ability to carry out large-scale land exercises. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Army is confident in its ability to deliver large-scale land exercises and remains committed to the continuous improvement and development of its capabilities. The scale and complexity of training exercises are being increased, including a transition from single battlegroup exercises to brigade level events. These exercises incorporate both live and virtual elements, ensuring integrated training that enhances operational readiness. |
|
Armoured Fighting Vehicles
Asked by: Lord Patten (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the (1) availability, and (2) fighting capability, of the army's armoured vehicles. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Army continually assesses capabilities to ensure we can meet NATO and wider operational requirements. The Army's capability and modernisation are driven by the Strategic Defence Review's direction to move to warfighting readiness, developing an Army that is more lethal, agile, and a globally engaged integrated force. This includes the aim to deliver a modernised, lethal division by 2030, capable of operating in complex environments. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
16 Jan 2026, 4:52 p.m. - House of Lords " Lord Stern Lord Patten by very quickly welcoming the noble Baroness Neate example of symptom " Lord Shinkwin (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 14th January 2026
Oral Evidence - Operation Kenova, and Jon Boutcher (Chief Constable at PSNI and former lead officer at Operation Kenova) Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Found: I do not think Lord Patten would have had any expectation that we would be having these conversations |