Lord Parekh Portrait

Lord Parekh

Labour - Life peer

Became Member: 10th May 2000


Lord Parekh is not a member of any APPGs
3 Former APPG memberships
India (Trade and Investment), Religion in the Media, University of Hull
Human Rights (Joint Committee)
3rd Jul 2001 - 2nd Dec 2003


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Lord Parekh has voted in 85 divisions, and 2 times against the majority of their Party.

29 Mar 2022 - Building Safety Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Parekh voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Labour No votes vs 37 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 117
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Parekh voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 2 Labour No votes vs 125 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 209
View All Lord Parekh Division Votes

Debates during the 2019 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)
(1 debate interactions)
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
(1 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Department for International Trade
(4 debate contributions)
Department for Education
(4 debate contributions)
Home Office
(4 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Assisted Dying Bill [HL] 2021-22
(535 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Lord Parekh's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Parekh, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Parekh has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Parekh has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 2 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
6th Jul 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether citizens of Commonwealth countries may be deported after serving custodial sentences for criminal offences in the UK; and if so, what assessment they have made of the effect of this policy on UK residents who arrived from Commonwealth countries before 1973 and may therefore be without documentation of their residential status.

Commonwealth citizens convicted of a crime in the UK and given a prison sentence will be considered for deportation at the earliest opportunity. Deportation will be pursued where it is conducive to the public good including where a person receives a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, commits an offence that caused serious harm or is a persistent offender. Section 7 of the Immigration Act 1971 provides an exemption from deportation for Commonwealth citizens resident in the UK on 1 January 1973 and ordinarily resident in the UK for at least 5 years before the decision to make a deportation order. The onus is on the person claiming an exemption under section 7 to prove they meet the criteria.

Baroness Williams of Trafford
Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms (HM Household) (Chief Whip, House of Lords)
6th Jul 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government what controls are placed on the use of additional capital funding given to local authorities for special programmes for meeting the needs of (1) ethnic minority groups, and (2) social deprivation, after the programmes have closed; and in particular, whether any remaining unspent funds are expected to be transferred to their general budgets, or remain ring-fenced for alleviating the specified needs.

The primary power used by Government to make grant payments to local authorities in England is Section 31 of the Local Government Act 2003 ('Section 31'). This power can also be used to make payments to authorities in Wales.

For Section 31 grants, Government has a long-standing policy to provide funding to local authorities on a non-ringfenced basis. Once the funding is issued local authorities have the flexibility to manage funding according to local priorities and deliver efficiencies, rather than central government trying to control every spending decision. Therefore, where a specific grant is provided to local government this should be non-ringfenced unless exceptional circumstances apply.

The conditions imposed on a particular grant will vary according to the needs of the particular policy. There isn't a single approach for all grants in a particular policy area. As part of this, departments will decide how they want to deal with underspend as a condition of the grant.

For Section 31 grants with a capital element, conditions must be imposed which require the capital element to be used only for capital purposes, enable the capital element to be 'clawed back' if this condition is not complied with, and require a declaration to be made by the recipient that the conditions of the grant have been complied with. These conditions are required to meet accounting rules and audit obligations.