Information between 14th July 2025 - 2nd September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 148 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 188 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 100 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 120 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 127 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
House of Lords: Public Appointments
Asked by: Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 16th July 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Smith of Basildon on 19 June (HLWS717), how the Prime Minister recommending a limited number of candidates to sit as Crossbench peers will differ from the responsibility vested in the House of Lords Appointments Commission to nominate Crossbench peers. Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal As set out in the written statement, the Prime Minister will continue to ask the House of Lords Appointments Commission to make nominations for individuals to sit as Crossbench peers. The Commission invites applications from the public and assesses candidates against the criteria set out on its website.
It is established practice that the Prime Minister can recommend a limited number of individuals to sit as Crossbench peers, based on their public service, including both distinguished public servants on retirement and individuals with a proven track record of service to the public. These nominations will continue to be vetted for propriety by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.
|
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Aug. 29 2025
HL Bill 84-IX Ninth marshalled list for Committee Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD NORTON OF LOUTH 502C_ After Clause 62, insert the following new Clause— “Review of the Act (1 |