Information between 20th July 2025 - 8th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 116 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 127 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Knight of Weymouth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Knight of Weymouth speeches from: Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025
Lord Knight of Weymouth contributed 2 speeches (129 words) Tuesday 22nd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Streaming: Classification Schemes
Asked by: Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 31st July 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the child protection benefits of streaming services partnering with the British Board of Film Classification to ensure that content is appropriately age-rated. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has not made an assessment of the child protection benefits of streaming services partnering with the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC). Ofcom, as the independent regulator, now has a new duty introduced through the Media Act 2024 to assess audience protection measures used by video-on-demand (VoD) services, such as age ratings, to ensure they are adequate to protect audiences from harm. The Government will in due course be designating mainstream VoD services, bringing them under enhanced regulation by Ofcom. Ofcom will then consult on a new standards code for these services, similar to the Broadcasting Code. This could include the use of age ratings, if Ofcom considers it appropriate.
|
|
Pornography: Internet
Asked by: Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour - Life peer) Monday 4th August 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that violent and abusive pornography that is illegal to distribute in physical formats is also prohibited online, as recommended in the Independent Pornography Review published on 27 February. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch The Independent Pornography Review assessed the effectiveness of pornography legislation, regulation, and enforcement and the Review’s findings continue to be assessed in detail by government departments. A further update on how the government is tackling the issues raised in the Review will be provided in due course. |
|
Pornography Review
Asked by: Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour - Life peer) Monday 4th August 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what is their timeline for a full response to the recommendations in the Independent Pornography Review published on 27 February. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch The Independent Pornography Review assessed the effectiveness of pornography legislation, regulation, and enforcement and the Review’s findings continue to be assessed in detail by government departments. A further update on how the government is tackling the issues raised in the Review will be provided in due course. |
|
Oak National Academy
Asked by: Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 28th August 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish the Oak National Academy market impact assessment in full alongside the independent review findings; and, if so, when. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education, is currently considering the findings of the independent review and market impact assessment of Oak National Academy. Both the findings of the review and the market impact assessment will be published in due course. |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Sep. 08 2025
HL Bill 84-X Tenth marshalled list for Committee Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD KNIGHT OF WEYMOUTH 436ZB_ Clause 45, page 109, line 28, at end insert— “(4A) In section 141C ( |
|
Aug. 29 2025
HL Bill 84-IX Ninth marshalled list for Committee Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill 66 Clause 45 LORD KNIGHT OF WEYMOUTH 436ZA_ Clause 45, page 108 |
|
Jul. 22 2025
HL Bill 113-IV Fourth marshalled list for Report Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: BARONESS WOLF OF DULWICH BARONESS GARDEN OF FROGNAL LORD ABERDARE LORD KNIGHT OF WEYMOUTH 181_ After |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th October 2025 2 p.m. Communications and Digital Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Media literacy At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Dame Melanie Dawes DCB - Chief Executive Officer at Ofcom View calendar - Add to calendar |