Information between 20th July 2025 - 30th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130 |
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140 |
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 100 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 127 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Jackson of Peterborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Jackson of Peterborough speeches from: Employment Rights Bill
Lord Jackson of Peterborough contributed 2 speeches (1,183 words) Report stage part one Wednesday 23rd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
Written Answers |
---|
East Coast Main Line: Standards
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to improve punctuality and service quality on the East Coast Mainline. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Department has invested £1.2 billion in route-wide upgrades across the East Coast Main Line (ECML) as part of the ECML Enhancements Programme. These investments will deliver significant improvements in journey times, reliability, and capacity, which will be realised through the introduction of the major timetable change in December 2025.
In addition, a further £105 million has been allocated to a package of enhancements at Darlington Station. Once completed by the end of the year, these works will support improved performance and reliability for passenger services across the northern section of the route.
To ensure successful implementation, an industry readiness taskforce is in place to support the delivery of the new timetable from day one with a focus on maintaining high performance standards across the route. |
Prisons: Unmanned Air Systems
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to defend the integrity of airspace above the prison estate from drone incursions which facilitate the delivery of illicit materials to prisoners. Answered by Lord Timpson - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is working hard to deter, detect and disrupt the use of illegal drones to deliver contraband into prisons. Restricted Fly Zones have been introduced around all closed prisons and young offender institutions. These restrictions make all unauthorised drone incursions a crime and support police and prison collaboration to disrupt illegal drone use. Those using drones to smuggle illicit items which drive violence and criminality in custody may face up to a decade behind bars. This year, we are investing over £40 million in physical security across 34 prisons. Whilst we cannot share our counter drone tactics, as that would aid sophisticated serious and organised criminals, HMPPS uses suitable technology, alongside physical countermeasures and intelligence tools, with the support of Law Enforcement Agencies, to disrupt those who use drones. We are also working with UK and global partners to understand the tactics used abroad and identify opportunities to strengthen our response to illicit drone activity. |
Greta Thunberg
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd July 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what correspondence the Prime Minister’s Office has had with Greta Thunberg since 4 July 2024. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) It is not routine to publish correspondence between the Prime Minister and any individual or organisation.
|
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish an impact assessment on closing the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy scheme. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence has considered the impact of closing the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy scheme (ARAP). The scheme was in operation for four years and had received over 190,000 applications. Over the duration of the scheme, over 95% of total applications have been found ineligible.
It is now considered that most of those who wished to apply for ARAP and would likely be eligible, will have already applied. ARAP has therefore fulfilled its purpose. The Department is not intending to publish an impact assessment. |
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish a list of (1) departments, (2) agencies, (3) non-departmental public bodies, and (4) devolved administrations, they consulted prior to the decision to close the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy scheme. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) scheme is administered by the Ministry of Defence, and the decision to close ARAP to new applications was taken following consultation with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Home Office, His Majesty’s Treasury and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Other agencies were first informed of the intent to bring Afghan schemes to a close in the Defence Secretary’s Written Ministerial Statement in the House of Commons in December 2024. |
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether Afghans who worked directly with UK forces and their families and who live in Afghanistan or Pakistan will have a pathway to settle in the UK following the decision to close the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy scheme. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Afghan nationals who wish to come to the UK can still make an application to the Home Office under the most suitable route within the Immigration Rules. Any such application would need to demonstrate that the applicant meets the relevant requirements for that route, including payment of any applicable fees. |
Afghanistan: Resettlement
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 24th July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they consulted the government of United States before closing the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy scheme. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) was a scheme developed by the UK Government to provide support to our Afghan Partners and allies. As such, the decision to close ARAP to new principal applications was taken by the UK Government. |
Chagos Islands: Defence
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 29th July 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the timetable and process for assessing whether payments made under the UK–Mauritius agreement on the Chagos Archipelago may be assigned as defence or security spending to reach the NATO target of 5 per cent of GDP; and whether NATO will play a role in assessing whether any such assignment qualifies under its guidelines. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The payments to Mauritius will be split between the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and the Ministry of Defence. The NATO qualifying status of these costs will be considered in the usual way. |
Chinese Embassy: Planning Permission
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 28th July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to providing protective works for the Wapping Telephone Exchange in deciding whether to grant planning permission for the proposed Chinese embassy at the Royal Mint Court. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) An independent Inspector held a public inquiry into the proposals in question, at which interested parties were able to put forward evidence and representations. All material planning considerations will be taken into account in reaching a decision on this case. |
Ministers: Travel
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 29th July 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the intention to reduce travel costs in the Civil Service, as outlined in the Spending Review of 11 June, will apply to ministerial travel. Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury) The Ministerial Code sets out that Ministers must ensure that they always make efficient and cost-effective travel arrangements. Ministerial travel in the UK is the responsibility of individual government departments with each department accountable for arranging the travel of its ministers, in line with the Ministerial Code. The Spending Review 2025 confirmed that UK government departments will deliver reductions in administration budgets of at least 11% in real terms by 2028-29, and 16% in real terms by 2029-30. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Employment Rights Bill
78 speeches (16,102 words) Report stage part one Wednesday 23rd July 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Con - Life peer) On Amendments 149A and 150A, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Jackson of Peterborough for his words - Link to Speech 2: Lord Leong (Lab - Life peer) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Jackson of Peterborough, and my noble friend Lady O’Grady - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Jul. 07 2025
Letter from Baroness Jones to Baroness Coffey, Lord Jackson and Lord Murray regarding the Fair Work Agency’s civil proceedings powers, EHRC similar powers, application to agricultural workers and whistleblowers. Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Will write letters Found: London SW1A 2DY The Rt Hon. the Baroness Coffey DBE The Lord Jackson of Peterborough |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Monday 21st July 2025
Correspondence - 21 July 2025, Letter from the Rt Hon Nick Thomas-Symonds MP re: Priorities of the Danish EU Council Presidency, July 2025 - December 2025 European Affairs Committee |
Thursday 7th August 2025
Correspondence - 6 August 2025, Letter from Home Secretary re: UK-France Treaty European Affairs Committee |