To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Immigration: EU Nationals
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what was the total cost of the inquiry undertaken by the Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens' Rights Agreements into delays issuing decisions on applications to the EU Settlement Scheme.

Answered by Baroness Levitt - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements does not record the cost of individual inquiries.

Costs to the Independent Monitoring Authority largely comprise staffing. The inquiry was primarily delivered by a small core team - three members of staff at any one time - who were also involved in other operational work.


Written Question
Immigration: EU Nationals
Tuesday 24th March 2026

Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, published on 5 March (HC1691), what estimate they have made of the number of individuals who will be affected by the changes to the EU Settlement Scheme to extend the period to 60 months in which an individual can use an expired biometric residence card as proof of their identity and nationality; and on what evidential basis that decision was taken.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The change in HC1691 extends the current provision which allows a non-EEA national to use an expired biometric residence card (BRC) as proof of their identity and nationality, where the BRC is up to 18 months expired. The change therefore allows a wider cohort of BRC holders to remain on a fully digital application journey, without having to attend a UK visa application centre. It also assists wider UK Visas and Immigration customers by lowering demand on UK Visas and Citizenship Application Services.


Division Vote (Lords)
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
Division Vote (Lords)
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 156 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
Division Vote (Lords)
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
Division Vote (Lords)
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
Speech in Lords Chamber - Fri 20 Mar 2026
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

"My Lords, I shall touch briefly on two points prompted by both the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay of Llandaff, and my noble friend Lord Blencathra. In a sense they are a challenge to the sponsor, the noble and learned Lord. I think I am right in saying that he was …..."
Lord Jackson of Peterborough - View Speech

View all Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Division Vote (Lords)
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118
Division Vote (Lords)
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118
Division Vote (Lords)
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110