To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 44 Conservative Aye votes vs 4 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 166
Division Vote (Lords)
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 9 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191
Division Vote (Lords)
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 37 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 64
Division Vote (Lords)
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 36 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 83
Written Question
Lobbying
Wednesday 18th March 2026

Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answers by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 18 December 2025 (HL12683) and 22 January 2026 (HL13471), what is the public interest reason for not disclosing (1) the dates of group phone calls with lobbyists, and (2) the names of the lobbying firms being briefed by the Government, in line with the guidance in the paragraphs 211 and 223 of the Guide to Parliamentary Work, updated 19 November 2024.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

I refer the Noble Lord back to HL12683:

Question: To ask His Majesty's Government on what dates calls have been held between the government and corporate lobbyists since 4 July 2024; which lobbying firms joined those calls; and which ministers have joined those calls.

Answer: Details of Ministers and Senior Officials' meetings, including those held using video or audio-conferencing technology, and including phone calls where these replace or take the format of an official meeting, are published by departments on GOV.UK every quarter.

GOV.UK transparency publications list details of Ministers' and Senior Officials' official meetings with all external organisations, including organised group telephone or video calls, where these replace or take the format of an official meeting.

These publications include the dates of meetings or calls, and the name(s) of the organisation(s) with whom the minister or senior official met.

Written Question
Chequers: Council Tax
Wednesday 18th March 2026

Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, in regard to paragraph 3.11 of the Ministerial Code, whether the Prime Minister has ensured that the second homes council tax premium has been properly discharged continually since 1 April 2025.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Ministerial Code sets out the standards of conduct expected of ministers. Ministers are personally responsible for deciding how to act and conduct themselves in the light of the Code.

Division Vote (Lords)
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171
Division Vote (Lords)
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177
Division Vote (Lords)
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165
Speech in Lords Chamber - Fri 13 Mar 2026
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

"My Lords, I think the debate that we have had for the last two and a half hours shows this House in a very positive light. It goes to the very essence of what some of us who are sceptical about the Bill believe to be the most crucial issue: …..."
Lord Jackson of Peterborough - View Speech

View all Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill