Information between 8th October 2024 - 7th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125 |
|
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 49 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 125 Noes - 155 |
|
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
|
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 138 |
|
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 128 |
|
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 59 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 124 |
|
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Hannan of Kingsclere voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 132 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Imran Khan
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the government of Pakistan about the continuing detention of Imran Khan; and what assessment they have made of reports that he has been denied phone calls and visits. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Foreign Secretary met with Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar on 4 September and 24 October to discuss a range of key issues, including Pakistan's domestic political situation. We have consistently urged the Pakistani authorities to demonstrate their democratic credentials by acting in line with their international obligations and with respect for the fundamental freedoms of all its citizens, including the right to a fair trial, due process and humane detention. |
|
Pakistan: Judiciary
Asked by: Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the remarks by the International Commission of Jurists that the passing of the 26th Constitutional Amendment by the government of Pakistan is a “blow to judicial independence, the rule of law, and human rights protection”; and what representations they have made to that government in that regard. Answered by Lord Collins of Highbury - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Any amendment to Pakistan's constitution is a matter for Pakistan. An independent judiciary able to check and balance other state organs is a critical element of a functioning democracy. |