Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

Debate between Lord Hampton and Lord Hacking
Wednesday 28th January 2026

(1 week, 2 days ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hampton Portrait Lord Hampton (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I will speak very briefly to add my name and voice to the force of nature that is my noble friend Lord Bird. We have heard points made forcefully by all noble Lords around the House. I think noble Lords all know what I do for a living; I am sorry to be boring about this.

Lord Hacking Portrait Lord Hacking (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

A schoolmaster!

Lord Hampton Portrait Lord Hampton (CB)
- Hansard - -

I am indeed a schoolteacher. Every day in Hackney I see the effects of poverty. We still have 55% free school meals in our school. Schoolteachers are very used to targets. Every pupil has target grades and if they do not hit their target grades, we have to explain why. It really does focus the mind. If we can solve child poverty, the entire Bill will be so much more powerful. The best way to solve poverty is with targets, so I beg the Government to accept the amendment.

Crime and Policing Bill

Debate between Lord Hampton and Lord Hacking
Lord Hampton Portrait Lord Hampton (CB)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, I briefly add my support to all these amendments, particularly the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Nash, which is fascinating. If we can get the software to do this, then why would we not? I offer a challenge to Ofcom, the Government and tech firms. If they can produce such sophisticated software that it can persuade children to kill themselves, why are BT and eBay’s chatbots so rubbish? We have to make AI a force for good, not for evil.

Lord Hacking Portrait Lord Hacking (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, having arrived in this House a very long time ago—53 years ago—I know this House works best if it treats legislation as an evolutionary process. The Online Safety Act seemed to be a very good Act when we passed it two years ago, but now we have further, drastic evidence, which we have heard in this debate. I am confident my noble friend the Minister will treat the speeches made in this debate as part of the evolutionary process which, I emphasise again, this House does best.