Data Protection Act 2018: Children Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Fowler
Main Page: Lord Fowler (Crossbench - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Fowler's debates with the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
(3 years, 9 months ago)
Lords ChamberI beg your pardon. Is it the Government’s position to adopt protections for children and then block meaningful routes of redress?
It is very important that those people asking supplementary questions keep them to a sensible time—otherwise, it simply knocks out other speakers lower down the list.
I reject the noble Baroness’s suggestion that the Government are blocking off meaningful means of redress. Our current data protection laws already offer strong protections to people, including children and other vulnerable groups, and we will continue to assist them in exercising their rights. Through the review, we sought, and have listened to, the views of children and their parents, and we are working with the Information Commissioner’s Office to raise awareness of the redress mechanisms available to them. Finally, civil society groups can still make complaints on behalf of children, as the noble Baroness suggests.
I apologise; I did not hear the first part of the noble Baroness’s question because it was cut off, so I will respond in writing.
My Lords, all supplementary questions have been asked, and we now move on to the third Oral Question.