Information between 13th July 2025 - 2nd August 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 148 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 38 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 191 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 170 |
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 34 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 36 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 34 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 38 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 121 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 136 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 40 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 21 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 39 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 64 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 48 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189 |
Written Answers |
---|
Football: Gambling
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 14th July 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the Advertising Standards Authority and the Gambling Commission about Premier League football clubs that are sponsored by unlicensed gambling businesses. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Minister for Gambling and Heritage met with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in December 2024. However, sponsorship of this kind is not within the remit of the ASA, whose CAP Code includes a specific exclusion for ‘sponsorship’. However, we regularly engage with the Gambling Commission on this issue. The Commission has been clear that sports organisations must diligently and continuously ensure that they are not advertising illegal gambling. Under current rules, sports organisations who engage in sponsoring and advertising arrangements with unlicensed gambling operators are at serious risk of committing the offence of advertising unlawful gambling under Section 330 of the Gambling Act 2005. The Commission has warned relevant club officials that they may be liable to prosecution and, if convicted, face a fine, imprisonment or both if they promote unlicensed gambling businesses that transact with consumers in Great Britain. The Commission is taking active steps to monitor online gambling activity for these unlicensed brands and to ensure they are blocked and inaccessible to consumers in Great Britain, and will take steps as necessary.
|
Renewable Energy: Carbon Emissions
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 15th July 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 7 January (HL3653), whether they considered the impact of (1) the removal of the ban on onshore wind generation, (2) the increase in offshore wind generation, (3) the increase in solar power generation, and (4) Great British Energy, in their assessments of the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in 2030. Answered by Lord Wilson of Sedgefield - Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) We will deliver an updated plan that sets out the policy package out to the end of Carbon Budget 6 in 2037 for all sectors of the economy by October 2025. This will outline the policies and proposals needed to deliver Carbon Budgets 4-6 and our Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) on a pathway to net zero, including for onshore wind, offshore wind and solar power generation, and describing Great British Energy’s potential role in supporting these sectors.
|
Gambling: Video Games
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish a report of the findings of the research carried out by Public Group International under a contract that ended on 31 March (procurement reference 104167) into the effectiveness of industry self-regulation of loot boxes. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Yes. We are finalising the research findings and will publish a report in due course. |
Prisoner Escorts
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 30th July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what penalties have been imposed on private sector companies providing Prisoner Escort and Custody Services in the most recent 12-month period for which data are available, broken down by court building and date. Answered by Lord Timpson - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) It would not be possible to provide disaggregated data at the level of detail requested without incurring disproportionate cost. |
Bill Documents |
---|
Jul. 22 2025
HL Bill 110-II Second marshalled list for Committee Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Strategies to specify a proportion of social rent housing. 61 Planning and Infrastructure Bill LORD FOSTER OF BATH |
Jul. 17 2025
HL Bill 110-I(b) Amendments for Committee (Supplementary to the Marshalled List) Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD FOSTER OF BATH _ After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause— “Planning permission relating |
Jul. 15 2025
HL Bill 110-I Marshalled list for Committee Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD FOSTER OF BATH 142★_ Clause 52, page 73, line 21, at end insert— “(c) the use of health impact |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 22nd July 2025 10:30 a.m. Justice and Home Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 9th September 2025 10:30 a.m. Justice and Home Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Investigation into electronic monitoring View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 2nd September 2025 10:30 a.m. Justice and Home Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Investigation into electronic monitoring At 10:30am: Oral evidence Rt Hon Alex Chalk KC Lord Bernard Hogan-Howe QPM At 11:15am: Oral evidence Helen Schofield - Chief Executive at Probation Institute View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
6 Jun 2025
Investigation into electronic monitoring Justice and Home Affairs Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions No description available |