Lord Foster of Bath Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Foster of Bath

Information between 21st March 2026 - 31st March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 155
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 159
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 51 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 166
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 46 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 46 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 44 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 140
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 51 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 197
26 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Foster of Bath voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes
Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 146


Written Answers
Sustainable Communities Act 2007
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 23rd March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many invitations they have made to local authorities to submit proposals under the Sustainable Communities Act 2007; when any such invitations were made; and what the outcome of each invitation was.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The government has issued two invitations to local authorities to submit proposals under the Sustainable Communities Act 2007. One in 2008, that resulted in a shortlist of 199 proposals and one in 2010. The 2010 invitation remains open. The department does not hold data on the total number of proposals made since 2010, or on the ultimate outcome of these proposals.

Gambling: Children
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Wednesday 25th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the findings of Raffaello Rossi, Edoardo Tozzi and Agnes Nairn published in Psychology and Marketing on 7 March, what assessment they have made of the adequacy of gambling protections for children, including the extent to which gambling content marketing is (1) appealing to children, (2) obviously identifiable as advertising, and (3) effectively countered by currently used educational interventions.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The government notes the findings of Raffaello Rossi, Edoardo Tozzi and Agnes Nairn published in Psychology and Marketing on 7 March. We remain committed to protecting children and young people from gambling related harm.

Operators must ensure that advertising is not targeted at children. In October 2025, the Advertising Standards Authority updated their guidance to rule that personalities or influencers with under-18s social media followings totalling at least 100,000 across all platforms is indicative of strong appeal to children and young people, and gambling advertisements cannot be promoted through these channels. We continue to work with a wide range of stakeholders on gambling protections for children.

As part of the Statutory Gambling Levy, the Office for Health, Inequalities and Disparity (OHID, are developing a robust spread of measures of gambling harm prevention activity, and are utilising a ‘test and learn’ approach to prevention activity such as gambling education.

Gambling: Licensing
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 26th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 March (HL15103), which gambling operators reported regulatory investigations or findings into other activities in other jurisdictions in (1) 2021–22, (2) 2022–23, (3) 2023–24, and (4) 2024–25.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The information requested relating to gambling operators and their overseas operators could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

The Gambling Commission is responsible for regulating gambling in Great Britain. It is for operators to satisfy themselves that they are acting in a lawful manner in other jurisdictions and for authorities in those jurisdictions to investigate if they are not.

The compliance with legal requirements in overseas jurisdictions is a question for the respective judicial authorities to investigate if operators are not compliant. Where a licensee is found to be operating illegally, the Commission may consider their suitability to hold a licence to offer gambling services in Great Britain.

Gambling: Licensing
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 26th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 March (HL15103), which gambling operators have been found to be operating illegally since 2020; and whether the licences of those operators to offer gambling services in Britain have been withdrawn.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The information requested relating to gambling operators and their overseas operators could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

The Gambling Commission is responsible for regulating gambling in Great Britain. It is for operators to satisfy themselves that they are acting in a lawful manner in other jurisdictions and for authorities in those jurisdictions to investigate if they are not.

The compliance with legal requirements in overseas jurisdictions is a question for the respective judicial authorities to investigate if operators are not compliant. Where a licensee is found to be operating illegally, the Commission may consider their suitability to hold a licence to offer gambling services in Great Britain.

Gambling: Licensing
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 26th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 March (HL15103), which gambling operators have substantial customer bases outside of Britain; and in which jurisdictions those customer bases are.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The information requested relating to gambling operators and their overseas operators could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

The Gambling Commission is responsible for regulating gambling in Great Britain. It is for operators to satisfy themselves that they are acting in a lawful manner in other jurisdictions and for authorities in those jurisdictions to investigate if they are not.

The compliance with legal requirements in overseas jurisdictions is a question for the respective judicial authorities to investigate if operators are not compliant. Where a licensee is found to be operating illegally, the Commission may consider their suitability to hold a licence to offer gambling services in Great Britain.

Gambling: Licensing
Asked by: Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 26th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 March (HL15103), what criteria they expect gambling operators to use to satisfy themselves that they are acting in a lawful manner in other jurisdictions.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The information requested relating to gambling operators and their overseas operators could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

The Gambling Commission is responsible for regulating gambling in Great Britain. It is for operators to satisfy themselves that they are acting in a lawful manner in other jurisdictions and for authorities in those jurisdictions to investigate if they are not.

The compliance with legal requirements in overseas jurisdictions is a question for the respective judicial authorities to investigate if operators are not compliant. Where a licensee is found to be operating illegally, the Commission may consider their suitability to hold a licence to offer gambling services in Great Britain.




Lord Foster of Bath mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 19th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 19 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair with an update on probation delivery

Justice and Home Affairs Committee

Found: SW1H 9AJ OFFICIAL Lord Timpson Minister of State for Justice The Rt Hon. the Lord Foster of Bath

Tuesday 17th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 17 March 2026 from the Right Honourable David Lammy MP, Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice to the Chair regarding the national rollout of child focused model in family courts

Justice and Home Affairs Committee

Found: Deputy Prime Minister Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice THE RT HON THE LORD FOSTER OF BATH

Monday 16th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 16 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair with an update on the government’s work regarding women in the criminal justice system

Justice and Home Affairs Committee

Found: SW1H 9AJ OFFICIAL Lord Timpson Minister of State for Justice The Rt Hon The Lord Foster of Bath

Tuesday 10th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 10 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair with a progress update on the Committee’s report, Better Prisons: Less Crime, with a table of progress included

Justice and Home Affairs Committee

Found: France London SW1H 9AJ OFFICIAL Lord Timpson Minister of State for Justice The Rt Hon The Lord Foster of Bath




Lord Foster of Bath - Select Committee Information

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 19th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 19 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair with an update on probation delivery

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Wednesday 18th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 18 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair regarding HMP Woodhill

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Tuesday 17th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 17 March 2026 from the Right Honourable David Lammy MP, Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice to the Chair regarding the national rollout of child focused model in family courts

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Monday 16th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 16 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair with an update on the government’s work regarding women in the criminal justice system

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Tuesday 10th March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 10 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair with a progress update on the Committee’s report, Better Prisons: Less Crime, with a table of progress included

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Tuesday 31st March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 20 March 2026 from Lord Timpson to the Chair regarding an update on the Ministry of Justice’s fire safety improvement works programme

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Tuesday 31st March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 18 March 2026 from Charlie Taylor, HM Inspectorate of Prisons to the Chair regarding review of the potential of family contact in prisons

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Tuesday 31st March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 24 March 2026 from Sarah Sackman KC MP, Minister of State for Courts and Legal Services regarding the local justice area reform consultation response publication

Justice and Home Affairs Committee
Tuesday 31st March 2026
Correspondence - Letter dated 24 March 2026 from Minister Tapp to the Chair following his oral evidence session on 10 March 2026

Justice and Home Affairs Committee