Business of the House Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Business of the House

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Excerpts
Thursday 29th November 2012

(11 years, 12 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Alderdice Portrait Lord Alderdice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my noble friend the Leader of the House share my curiosity that there was such unanimity in this House, and indeed in the other place, in welcoming the developments of very unusual forms of coalition in my part of the United Kingdom and regarding those as important pieces of political progress, and yet when it comes to having to face exactly the same kinds of issues of coalition together in this place, there seems to be a mixture of puzzlement and amusement? Would it not be wise for those who may find themselves in a coalition Government in the future to be a little more circumspect or they will find such matters being quoted against them, as has repeatedly been the case in the last little while on a number of matters of policy where the Labour Party in its previous incarnation said rather different things from what it has said while on the opposition Benches?

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - -

Surely this House is about holding the Government to account, and we have Statements so that we can hold the Government to account—not for people to issue their manifestos on particular issues. Surely the purpose of this House is to hold the Government to account, but we need someone to tell us what the Government’s policy is. We cannot have a pick-and-mix approach to government policy. Are we to find that Ministers speaking from the Front Bench give two answers to the same question? What conclusion can we reach if they give different answers to the same question?

Lord Cormack Portrait Lord Cormack
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is it now not abundantly plain that antiphonal would be better?