Information between 14th July 2025 - 12th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 188 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 191 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 131 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 155 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 123 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 123 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 41 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 189 |
|
23 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 198 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Colgrain speeches from: Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill
Lord Colgrain contributed 1 speech (513 words) 2nd reading Friday 5th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Lower Thames Crossing: Finance
Asked by: Lord Colgrain (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 21st July 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what progress they have made in securing funding under a private finance initiative or similar model for the Lower Thames Crossing. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Government is providing £590m of capital funding to progress work on the Lower Thames Crossing. The Government is looking to bring private sector finance and expertise into this project, and further work will now be undertaken with the private sector to design a long-term funding model which delivers value for money for the taxpayer.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Sep 2025, 12:52 p.m. - House of Lords "circumstances described by Lord Colgrain, the dogs run free. I give " Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
5 Sep 2025, 1:06 p.m. - House of Lords "one and 10 cases of sheep worrying every year. The noble Lord Colgrain " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill
27 speeches (9,859 words) 2nd reading Friday 5th September 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Mentions: 1: Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Con - Life peer) support, including giving the police the authority in the circumstances described by my noble friend Lord Colgrain - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Lab - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Colgrain, spoke about a particularly harrowing attack, which demonstrates why the - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Coffey (Con - Life peer) particular facility is.I note that the reason we are here is really that put forward by my noble friend Lord Colgrain - Link to Speech |