Lord Colgrain Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Colgrain

Information between 30th October 2024 - 18th January 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 125
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 166 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 139
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 59 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 124
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 138
20 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 184 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 213
20 Nov 2024 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 129 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 140 Noes - 117
20 Nov 2024 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 57 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 172
20 Nov 2024 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 172 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 136
13 Jan 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Colgrain voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 120


Speeches
Lord Colgrain speeches from: Restoration and Renewal: Annual Progress Report
Lord Colgrain contributed 2 speeches (1,224 words)
Thursday 16th January 2025 - Grand Committee
Lord Colgrain speeches from: House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill
Lord Colgrain contributed 1 speech (580 words)
2nd reading: Part 2
Wednesday 11th December 2024 - Lords Chamber
Leader of the House
Lord Colgrain speeches from: Farming Families
Lord Colgrain contributed 1 speech (558 words)
Thursday 21st November 2024 - Lords Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Lord Colgrain speeches from: Newly Qualified Young Drivers
Lord Colgrain contributed 2 speeches (177 words)
Monday 11th November 2024 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport


Written Answers
Palace of Westminster: Repairs and Maintenance
Asked by: Lord Colgrain (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)
Monday 6th January 2025

Question

To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker what has been the cost of the work on the Restoration and Renewal programme since 2012 in respect of (1) the salaries, recruitment fees, and redundancy payments for non-parliamentary staff, such as those working for the Sponsor Body and Delivery Authority, (2) the costs of contractors to undertake surveys and preparatory work, and (3) the work assessing and preparing decant locations.

Answered by Lord Gardiner of Kimble

The Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body and Restoration and Renewal (R&R) Delivery Authority were established in April and May 2020 respectively. The Sponsor Body was abolished on 1 January 2023 and its functions transferred to the R&R Client Team in Parliament. Prior to this, work related to the restoration and renewal of the Palace was funded and managed by the House Administrations. Both the R&R Client Team and Delivery Authority routinely publish information on costs, for instance in quarterly reports, annual reports, and memoranda provided to the Parliamentary Works Estimates Commission, as did the Sponsor Body prior to its abolition.

Staff costs for the Sponsor Body for its full two years of operation (2020-21 and 2021-22) are set out in its Annual Reports and Accounts (available at https://www.restorationandrenewal.uk/sponsor-body-archive), and amount to approximately £8.4 million. In 2022-23 the Sponsor Body was abolished and its costs merged into the R&R Client Team, which is a joint department of both Houses.

It is not possible to disaggregate recruitment fees for the Sponsor Body as this falls within other elements of expenditure. Approximately £540,000, excluding employer’s pensions and national insurance contributions, was paid in settlement payments to senior staff of the Sponsor Body (three Executive Directors and the Accounting Officer) which they were entitled to under their contracts, rather than seeking to transfer to the new Client Team. These settlement payments were approved by the Sponsor Body Nominations and Renumerations Committee and audited by the National Audit Office.

Staff costs for the R&R Delivery Authority from 2020-21 to 2023-24 are set out in its Annual Report and Financial Statements (available at https://www.restorationandrenewal.uk/about-us/corporate-publications), and amount to approximately £59.1 million. Recruitment fees in the Delivery Authority over this period amount to approximately £710,000.

Under the R&R Programme, tens of thousands of hours of complex building surveys and investigations to develop ever more detailed records of the Palace of Westminster have been carried out. These records are being used to inform design and planning, and future decisions on the essential restoration work required. Since its establishment in 2020 up to the end of 2023-24, the R&R Delivery Authority has spent approximately £28 million on surveys to the Palace.

The estimated costs incurred by the R&R Delivery Authority in respect of developing and assessing the QEII Conference Centre as the preferred decant location of the House of Lords from 2020-21 to 2023-24 is £12m. These figures do not include Sponsor Body, R&R Client Team, or House of Lords staff costs and do cover some other work related to temporary accommodation, where it is not possible to disaggregate work carried out by contractors to cover multiple activities. The work to assess and prepare for House of Commons decant location options, including the expenditure for that work, is the responsibility of the governance bodies in the House of Commons.




Lord Colgrain mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Restoration and Renewal: Annual Progress Report
37 speeches (19,366 words)
Thursday 16th January 2025 - Grand Committee

Mentions:
1: Lord Berkeley (Lab - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Colgrain, mentioned Notre-Dame, and I also remember putting down a Question about - Link to Speech
2: Earl of Devon (XB - Excepted Hereditary) The noble Lord, Lord Colgrain, put it at £450 million, so I thank him for that. - Link to Speech
3: Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Non-affiliated - Life peer) I was very struck by one of the areas that may, I hope, be more helpful to the noble Lord, Lord Colgrain - Link to Speech



Written Answers
Peers
Asked by: Lord Strathclyde (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)
Friday 17th January 2025

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government which current members of the House of Lords will be affected by the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill as currently drafted.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal

The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill delivers the manifesto commitment to remove the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. As a result of the Bill, the 92 seats currently reserved for hereditary peers will be removed. The Bill will remove the remaining hereditary peers at the end of the Parliamentary session in which it receives Royal Assent. A list of the current hereditary peers can be found below

Title

Party/group

Earl Attlee

Conservative

Earl Cathcart

Conservative

Earl Howe

Conservative

Earl Peel

Crossbench

Earl Russell

Liberal Democrat

Lord Aberdare

Crossbench

Lord Addington

Liberal Democrat

Lord Altrincham

Conservative

Lord Ashcombe

Conservative

Lord Ashton of Hyde

Non-affiliated

Lord Bethell

Conservative

Lord Borwick

Conservative

Lord Camoys

Conservative

Lord Carrington

Crossbench

Lord Colgrain

Conservative

Lord Crathorne

Conservative

Lord Cromwell

Crossbench

Lord de Clifford

Crossbench

Lord De Mauley

Conservative

Lord Fairfax of Cameron

Conservative

Lord Freyberg

Crossbench

Lord Geddes

Conservative

Lord Glenarthur

Conservative

Lord Grantchester

Labour

Lord Greenway

Crossbench

Lord Hacking

Labour

Lord Hampton

Crossbench

Lord Harlech

Conservative

Lord Henley

Conservative

Lord Inglewood

Non-affiliated

Lord Londesborough

Crossbench

Lord Lucas

Conservative

Lord Mancroft

Conservative

Lord Meston

Crossbench

Lord Mountevans

Crossbench

Lord Moynihan

Conservative

Lord Northbrook

Conservative

Lord Ravensdale

Crossbench

Lord Reay

Conservative

Lord Remnant

Conservative

Lord Roborough

Conservative

Lord Russell of Liverpool

Crossbench

Lord Sandhurst

Conservative

Lord St John of Bletso

Crossbench

Lord Strathcarron

Conservative

Lord Strathclyde

Conservative

Lord Thurlow

Crossbench

Lord Trefgarne

Conservative

Lord Trevethin and Oaksey

Crossbench

Lord Vaux of Harrowden

Crossbench

Lord Wrottesley

Conservative

The Duke of Montrose

Conservative

The Duke of Norfolk

Crossbench

The Duke of Somerset

Crossbench

The Duke of Wellington

Crossbench

The Earl of Arran

Conservative

The Earl of Caithness

Conservative

The Earl of Clancarty

Crossbench

The Earl of Cork and Orrery

Crossbench

The Earl of Courtown

Conservative

The Earl of Devon

Crossbench

The Earl of Dundee

Conservative

The Earl of Effingham

Conservative

The Earl of Erroll

Crossbench

The Earl of Glasgow

Liberal Democrat

The Earl of Kinnoull

Crossbench

The Earl of Leicester

Conservative

The Earl of Lindsay

Conservative

The Earl of Liverpool

Conservative

The Earl of Lytton

Crossbench

The Earl of Minto

Conservative

The Earl of Oxford and Asquith

Crossbench

The Earl of Rosslyn

Crossbench

The Earl of Shrewsbury

Conservative

The Earl of Stair

Crossbench

Viscount Astor

Conservative

Viscount Bridgeman

Conservative

Viscount Brookeborough

Crossbench

Viscount Camrose

Conservative

Viscount Colville of Culross

Crossbench

Viscount Craigavon

Crossbench

Viscount Eccles

Conservative

Viscount Goschen

Conservative

Viscount Hanworth

Labour

Viscount Stansgate

Labour

Viscount Thurso

Liberal Democrat

Viscount Trenchard

Conservative

Viscount Waverley

Crossbench

Viscount Younger of Leckie

Conservative




Lord Colgrain - Select Committee Information

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 27th November 2024
Correspondence - Letter from Rt Hon Wes Streeting MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, dated 25 November 2024

Food, Diet and Obesity Committee
Thursday 30th January 2025
Government Response - Government response to the Committee's special inquiry report

Food, Diet and Obesity Committee