Debates between Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Bach during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Debate between Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Bach
Wednesday 1st February 2012

(12 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Clement-Jones Portrait Lord Clement-Jones
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply. Apart from the metaphorical slap on the wrist at the end of his response, it was generally helpful. I thank those who have spoken to the amendments. The noble Lord, Lord Hunt, made some interesting contributions and it is good to hear that the Minister is looking favourably on those amendments. The phrase about removing the excess from the system is very powerful. My noble friend talked about commoditisation and the possibility of litigation futures. The lawyers are probably salivating at that prospect. A number of noble Lords have recounted their experiences in this area. I will not add to the list of those who have spoken on that. However, I have even received a text message when I have not had an accident, which just shows the assiduity with which these characters operate.

I enjoyed hearing the noble Lord, Lord Bach, going well off piste when discussing the Jackson report in responding to my humble reference to a single aspect of that report, which was then inflated into a general reference to the whole of the Jackson report.

Lord Bach Portrait Lord Bach
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I say with the greatest respect to the noble Lord that of course I remember his comment on Lord Justice Jackson’s report, but in this instance I was referring to what the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, said about that report.

Lord Clement-Jones Portrait Lord Clement-Jones
- Hansard - -

It is very useful to explain it in that way.

I thank the Minister particularly for his sympathy for Amendment 165. I very much hope that he will carry that forward to Report. Having looked at the existing legislation, I think it would be extremely useful to signpost that measure explicitly in this legislation. I also thank him for his assurance about pooled marketing and legitimate activities on the part of those pooled marketing schemes. They perform a very useful service and it would be a retrograde step if they were not able to continue. I will read with great care what the Minister said about Clause 55(9). I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.