Lord Clement-Jones - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Clement-Jones

Information between 7th April 2026 - 17th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 41 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 45 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 37 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clement-Jones voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 41 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144

Speeches
Lord Clement-Jones speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill Lord Clement-Jones contributed 5 speeches (1,715 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Thursday 16th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office
Lord Clement-Jones speeches from: Artificial Intelligence: Impact on Employment Lord Clement-Jones contributed 1 speech (75 words) Monday 13th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade

Written Answers
Palantir: Contracts Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 8th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government what assurances they have received from Palantir about the government of the USA's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence (MOD) requires all suppliers, including Palantir, to meet UK Government security and supply chain assurance standards. Palantir remains subject to ongoing MOD commercial and security oversight, and the MOD is satisfied that appropriate assurances are in place.
Palantir: Contracts Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what assurances they have received, if any, from Palantir that the US government's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk will not affect the delivery of their contracts with the UK Government. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government utilises a range of suppliers based on operational requirements, value for money, and compliance with our security and legal obligations, with all suppliers subject to rigorous due diligence. It is the responsibility of each contracting authority to ensure that contracts that they award are suitable for their requirements and legally compliant, and to monitor and manage the supplier's performance against their contractual obligations. All contracting authorities are simultaneously encouraged to follow the Government Security Group’s guidance on Tackling Security Risk in Government Supply Chains, which details best practices for procurement, commercial, and security practitioners when selecting and onboarding suppliers.

Written Answers

Palantir: Contracts
Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Wednesday 8th April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assurances they have received from Palantir about the government of the USA's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk.

Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) requires all suppliers, including Palantir, to meet UK Government security and supply chain assurance standards. Palantir remains subject to ongoing MOD commercial and security oversight, and the MOD is satisfied that appropriate assurances are in place.

Palantir: Contracts
Asked by: Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Friday 17th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assurances they have received, if any, from Palantir that the US government's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk will not affect the delivery of their contracts with the UK Government.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government utilises a range of suppliers based on operational requirements, value for money, and compliance with our security and legal obligations, with all suppliers subject to rigorous due diligence.

It is the responsibility of each contracting authority to ensure that contracts that they award are suitable for their requirements and legally compliant, and to monitor and manage the supplier's performance against their contractual obligations. All contracting authorities are simultaneously encouraged to follow the Government Security Group’s guidance on Tackling Security Risk in Government Supply Chains, which details best practices for procurement, commercial, and security practitioners when selecting and onboarding suppliers.

Lord Clement-Jones mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
14 Apr 2026, 4:04 p.m. - House of Commons "were concessions secured by our Liberal Democrat colleague Lord Clement-jones. Respect orders will grant police extended powers to " Max Wilkinson MP (Cheltenham, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 12:04 p.m. - House of Lords "the noble Lord Clement-Jones on a number of occasions, and I fully understand the concerns that he has " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 12:34 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lord Clement-Jones amendments, two D and two E, which the Baroness Fox of Buckley also supported. I want to just assure the noble Lord " Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 12:34 p.m. - House of Lords "stress that the government agrees with the sentiment behind the amendments in this group on the noble Lord Clement-Jones amendments, " Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 12:37 p.m. - House of Lords "to offer reassurances to the noble Lord Clement-Jones on his " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 12:12 p.m. - House of Lords " The question is that motion A, B agreed to motion A1 Lord Clement-Jones. >> To move motion. >> A1 as an amendment to. >> Motion A and insert an. >> Do. " Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 12:24 p.m. - House of Lords " My Lords. My Lords, I wanted to just support the noble Lord Lord just support the noble Lord Lord Clement-Jones, who's excellent exposition of why amendment A1 is " Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript
16 Apr 2026, 1:35 p.m. - House of Lords "question of incest. The. In relation to the point made by the noble Lord Clement-Jones as to the differential in age, it's to make " Baroness Levitt, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript

Parliamentary Debates
Crime and Policing Bill 129 speeches (22,288 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Thursday 16th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) I have had discussions with the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, on a number of occasions and I fully - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated - Life peer) My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. - Link to Speech 3: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) On Amendments 2D and 2E, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and supported by the noble Baroness - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) children and the question of step-incest, in relation to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones - Link to Speech
Crime and Policing Bill 140 speeches (28,998 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Max Wilkinson (LD - Cheltenham) regarding respect orders, which were concessions secured by our Liberal Democrat colleague Lord Clement-Jones - Link to Speech

Parliamentary Debates

Crime and Policing Bill
129 speeches (22,288 words)
Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons
Thursday 16th April 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office

Mentions:
1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) I have had discussions with the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, on a number of occasions and I fully - Link to Speech
2: Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated - Life peer) My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. - Link to Speech
3: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) On Amendments 2D and 2E, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and supported by the noble Baroness - Link to Speech
4: Baroness Levitt (Lab - Life peer) children and the question of step-incest, in relation to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones - Link to Speech

Crime and Policing Bill
140 speeches (28,998 words)
Consideration of Lords amendments
Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Home Office

Mentions:
1: Max Wilkinson (LD - Cheltenham) regarding respect orders, which were concessions secured by our Liberal Democrat colleague Lord Clement-Jones - Link to Speech