Departmental Expenditure Limits Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Ministry of Justice
Lord Clarke of Nottingham
Main Page: Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Clarke of Nottingham's debates with the Ministry of Justice
Departmental Expenditure Limits
Lord Clarke of Nottingham Excerpts
Wednesday 24th November 2010
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
(14 years ago)
Written StatementsRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (Mr Kenneth Clarke)
Subject to parliamentary approval of any necessary supplementary estimate, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and The National Archives (TNA) total departmental expenditure limit (DEL) will be increased as follows:
Total DEL for MoJ (Request for Resource 1, 2 and 3) is increased by £110,348,000 from £8,989,358,000 to £9,099,706,000 and the administration budget has increased by £5,084,000 from £411,146,000 to £416,230,000.
Total DEL for the TNA has remained unchanged.
Within the Total DEL change for MoJ (Request for Resource 1, 2 & 3), the impact on resource and capital are as set out in the following table:
Voted | Non-voted | Voted | Non-voted | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | £’000 | |
Resource DEL | 95,929 | (28,581) | 5,751,277 | 3,181,996 | 8,933,273 |
Of which: | |||||
Administration1 | 5,084 | 0 | 415,688 | 542 | 416,230 |
Capital DEL2 | 49,800 | (6,800) | 552,925 | 41,405 | 594,330 |
Depreciation3 | 0 | 0 | 414,979 | 12,918 | (427,897) |
Total DEL | 145,729 | (35,381) | 5,889,223 | 3,210,483 | 9,099,706) |
1The total of 'administration budget' and 'near-cash in Resource DEL' figures may well be greater than total Resource DEL, due to the definitions overlapping. 2Capital DEL includes items treated as resource in Estimates and accounts but which are treated as Capital DEL in budgets. 3Depreciation, which forms part of Resource DEL, is excluded from the total DEL since Capital DEL includes capital spending and to include depreciation of those assets would lead to double counting. |
The change in the Resource and Capital DEL for MoJ arises from:
Resource Departmental Expenditure Limit
The change in the resource element of DEL arises from:
Movements in Voted Expenditure
Request for Resources 1
Increase
i. An increase in voted expenditure of £139,000,000 resource in relation to the prison capacity programme Carter reserve claim.
ii. An increase of £18,000,000 from the Department for Education (DfE) in relation to the transfer of the youth offender policy Machinery of Government transfer.
iii. An increase of £14,000,000 from the Home Office (HO) to the Tribunals Service in relation to work related to the Asylum Immigration Tribunals.
iv. An increase of £12,300,000 from the HO in relation to accommodation costs for 2 Marsham Street.
v. An increase of £170,000 from the DfE in relation to funding the Review of Restraint Machinery of Government transfer.
vi. An increase of £1,689,000 from the Department of Business Innovation and Skills (DBIS) in relation to the delivery of offender learning and skills in the contracted prison estate.
vii. An increase of £400,000 from the HO in relation to the Victim Commissioners Office.
viii. An increase of £50,000 from the HO in relation to the advisory panel into Deaths in Custody.
ix. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £2,000,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
x. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £637,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xi. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £352,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xii. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £342,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xiii. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £199,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xiv. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £173,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xv. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £160,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xvi. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £62,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
Decrease
xvii. A decrease in voted expenditure offset by an increase in non-voted expenditure of £34,000,000 in relation to reclassification of spends.
xviii. A decrease in voted expenditure of £11,794,000 from the MoJ to the Cabinet Office (CO) in relation to the transfer of policy for the constitutional and electoral reform Machinery of Government transfer.
xix. A decrease in voted expenditure of £ 10,513,000 from MoJ to the Department of Health (DoH) in relation to additional prisoner healthcare costs.
xx. A decrease in voted expenditure of £9,809,000 from MoJ to DBIS in relation to additional operating costs in respect of libraries and careers information and advice service.
xxi. A decrease in voted expenditure of £4,300,000 from MoJ to Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in relation to Compass Case Management Funding.
xxii. A decrease in voted expenditure of £2,600,000 from MoJ to CPS in relation to witness centres.
xxiii. A decrease in voted expenditure of £1,401,000 from MoJ to DBIS in relation to Castington and Huntercombe re-role from juvenile to adult prisons.
xxiv. A decrease in voted expenditure of £500,000 from MoJ to CPS in relation to Corporate Manslaughter funding.
xxv. A decrease in voted expenditure of £785,000 from MoJ to CPS in relation to Local Criminal Boards.
xxvi. A decrease in voted expenditure offset by an increase in non-voted expenditure of £16,500,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority.
xxvii. A decrease in voted expenditure offset by an increase in non-voted expenditure of £1,200,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Legal Services Commission.
xxviii. A decrease in voted expenditure offset by an increase in non-voted expenditure of £173,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Parole Board.
xxix. A decrease in voted expenditure offset by an increase in non-voted expenditure of £30,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
Movements in Non-Voted Expenditure
Request for Resources 1
Increase
i. An increase in non-voted expenditure offset by a decrease in voted expenditure of £34,000,000 in relation to reclassification of spends.
ii. An increase in non-voted expenditure of £13,560,000 from the DfE in relation to funding the LASCHS Programme Machinery of Government transfer.
iii. An increase in non-voted expenditure of £6,081,000 from the DfE in relation to the transfer of the youth offender policy Machinery of Government transfer.
iv. An increase in non-voted expenditure of £3,000,000 from the DfE in relation to funding the Intensive Fostering Programme Machinery of Government transfer.
v. An increase in non-voted expenditure of £3,000,000 from the DfE in relation to funding the Review of Restraint Machinery of Government transfer.
vi. An increase in non-voted expenditure offset by a decrease in voted expenditure of £16,500,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority.
vii. An increase in non-voted expenditure offset by a decrease in voted expenditure of £1,200,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Legal Services Commission.
viii. An increase in non-voted expenditure offset by a decrease in voted expenditure of £173,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Parole Board.
ix. An increase in non-voted expenditure offset by a decrease in voted expenditure of £30,000 in relation to increase in grant funding for the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
Decrease
x. A decrease in non-voted expenditure of £102,200,000 (Election Funding) from the MoJ to the CO in relation to the transfer of policy for the constitutional and electoral reform Machinery of Government transfer.
xi. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £2,000,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xii. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £637,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xiii. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £352,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xiv. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £342,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xv. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £199,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xvi. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £173,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xvii. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £160,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
xviii. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £62,000 in relation to internal funding movement.
Request for Resources 2
Increase
i. An increase in non-voted expenditure of £539,572,000 in relation to Grant to the Scottish Consolidated Fund.
Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit
The change in the capital element of the Departmental Expenditure Limit arises from:
Movements in Voted Expenditure
Request for Resources 1
Increase
i. An increase of £43,000,000 in relation to the carter prisons capacity programme capital Carter reserve claim.
ii. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £6,000,000 in relation to an internal movement in funding.
iii. An increase in voted expenditure offset by a decrease in non-voted expenditure of £800,000 in relation to an internal movement in funding.
Movements in Non-Voted Expenditure
Request for Resources 1
Decrease
i. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £6,000,000 in relation to an internal movement in funding.
ii. A decrease in non-voted expenditure offset by an increase in voted expenditure of £800,000 in relation to an internal movement in funding.
Administration Costs
The movement in the administration cost limit is as a result of the following changes:
Request for Resources 1
Increase
i. An increase in voted expenditure of £12,300,000 from the HO in relation to accommodation costs for 2 Marsham Street.
Decrease
ii. A decrease in voted expenditure of £7,216,000 from the MoJ to the CO in relation to the transfer of policy for the constitutional and electoral reform Machinery of Government transfer.
2) The National Archives are not submitting a Winter Supplementary Estimate.