Information between 8th July 2025 - 18th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 239 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 247 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 188 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 148 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 137 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
14 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 158 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 138 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Clarke of Nottingham voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Clarke of Nottingham speeches from: Taxes
Lord Clarke of Nottingham contributed 1 speech (118 words) Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Lord Clarke of Nottingham speeches from: Trial by Jury: Proposed Restrictions
Lord Clarke of Nottingham contributed 1 speech (114 words) Monday 14th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Lord Clarke of Nottingham speeches from: Government Performance against Fiscal Rules
Lord Clarke of Nottingham contributed 1 speech (111 words) Tuesday 8th July 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
107 speeches (29,053 words) Committee stage: Part 2 Thursday 10th July 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (XB - Life peer) The noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Nottingham, spoke powerfully on that subject.Secondly, there was the problem - Link to Speech |