Information between 31st March 2025 - 10th May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 14th May 2025 Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: BBC's decision to deny access to BBC Sounds for people travelling or living abroad View calendar - Add to calendar |
Division Votes |
---|
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 143 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 157 |
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 19 Noes - 112 |
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 104 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 51 Noes - 106 |
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 129 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 148 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157 |
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216 |
30 Apr 2025 - Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 54 Noes - 124 |
30 Apr 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 157 |
Speeches |
---|
Lord Blunkett speeches from: Pupil Absenteeism
Lord Blunkett contributed 2 speeches (104 words) Wednesday 7th May 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for International Development |
Lord Blunkett speeches from: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Lord Blunkett contributed 1 speech (550 words) Thursday 1st May 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for International Development |
Lord Blunkett speeches from: Wales: Nuclear Power Generation
Lord Blunkett contributed 1 speech (68 words) Tuesday 29th April 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Lord Blunkett speeches from: Democracy and Unelected Strong Leaders
Lord Blunkett contributed 2 speeches (64 words) Thursday 3rd April 2025 - Lords Chamber |
Lord Blunkett speeches from: Basel 3.1
Lord Blunkett contributed 1 speech (39 words) Thursday 3rd April 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury |
Lord Blunkett speeches from: Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL]
Lord Blunkett contributed 7 speeches (1,320 words) Report stage Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport |
Written Answers |
---|
VE Day: Anniversaries
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 1st April 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to involve Service families and their children in the official celebrations announced for the 80th anniversary of VE Day. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government has announced an ambitious programme for the entire nation to commemorate the 80th anniversaries of VE and VJ Day. Communities across the country will come together to mark the commemorations - by participating in the official government programme and by organising their own events and activities. Everyone across the UK is invited to participate in events and activities designed to honour the contributions and experiences of the Second World War generation. Service families and their children will be included in the official celebrations and at the centre of nationwide, locally led commemorations. Furthermore, the Imperial War Museums’ Letters to Loved Ones initiative encourages children to share wartime letters, fostering intergenerational connections and learning. DCMS has launched an interactive website - ve-vjday80.gov.uk - which offers key information and resources, including ways to get involved in the commemorations. The site features downloadable digital materials and an interactive map of events.
|
Armed Forces: Children
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 1st April 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Armed Forces Covenant Legal Duty as it applies to schools; and whether they plan to update the school admissions code (1) to give priority to children of Service families, and (2) to provide for siblings, where appropriate, to attend the same school. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Minister for Women and Equalities) The government has policies in place to support schools and local authorities to fulfil their duty to give due regard to the Armed Forces Covenant. This includes in specific areas of education provision, including school admissions. The school admissions code already contains a number of measures to support service children in relation to school admissions. These measures include requiring admission authorities to allocate school places in advance of a service family moving into the area, where a place is available, provided the application is accompanied by an official letter that declares a re-location date. Children of UK service personnel can also be admitted as exceptions to the infant class size limit if they move outside the normal admission round. Furthermore, admission authorities are able to give priority in their oversubscription criteria to children in receipt of the Service Pupil Premium, and publicly funded boarding schools must give service children who qualify for Ministry of Defence financial assistance with the cost of boarding fees priority after looked after and previously looked after children. Admission authorities are already able to give priority to siblings in their admissions criteria where they feel that is appropriate to their local circumstances, although they are not required to do so. Through the Children’s Wellbeing and School Bill, this government is taking further steps to ensure a more robust safety net for children who struggle to secure a school place via the usual in-year admissions processes, by giving local authorities the levers they need to secure places for children more quickly and efficiently, when the usual in-year admissions processes fall short. |
Armed Forces: Children
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 1st April 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to provide military families with priority for school admissions when parents are transferred from one place to another. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Minister for Women and Equalities) The government has policies in place to support schools and local authorities to fulfil their duty to give due regard to the Armed Forces Covenant. This includes in specific areas of education provision, including school admissions. The school admissions code already contains a number of measures to support service children in relation to school admissions. These measures include requiring admission authorities to allocate school places in advance of a service family moving into the area, where a place is available, provided the application is accompanied by an official letter that declares a re-location date. Children of UK service personnel can also be admitted as exceptions to the infant class size limit if they move outside the normal admission round. Furthermore, admission authorities are able to give priority in their oversubscription criteria to children in receipt of the Service Pupil Premium, and publicly funded boarding schools must give service children who qualify for Ministry of Defence financial assistance with the cost of boarding fees priority after looked after and previously looked after children. Admission authorities are already able to give priority to siblings in their admissions criteria where they feel that is appropriate to their local circumstances, although they are not required to do so. Through the Children’s Wellbeing and School Bill, this government is taking further steps to ensure a more robust safety net for children who struggle to secure a school place via the usual in-year admissions processes, by giving local authorities the levers they need to secure places for children more quickly and efficiently, when the usual in-year admissions processes fall short. |
Gov Facility Services: Contracts
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 9th April 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what recent analysis has been undertaken of additional costs or savings arising from the decision to outsource Gov Facilities Services Limited, and what steps have been taken to revisit this decision since July 2024. Answered by Lord Timpson - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The Government has initiated a programme of work to secure new, competitively tendered contracts for the provision of maintenance services for prisons. As the procurement process is currently live, information regarding costs and savings is commercially and market sensitive and therefore not able to be disclosed at the current time. In November 2024, I approved plans to proceed with re-procuring the delivery of facilities management services through the private sector, with a focus on ensuring that future contracts incentivise suppliers’ performance and maintain a focus on delivery outcomes. This approach is kept under constant review to ensure we get the best value for taxpayers’ money. |
Government Departments: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 9th April 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, in the light of their announcement of a 15 per cent reduction in Civil Service running costs over the next four years, what plans they have to monitor a similar cost reduction in government activities carried out under outsourcing arrangements. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) As the Chancellor announced in the Spring Statement, Government departments will aim to reduce their administrative budgets by 15% by the end of the decade. Savings on back‑office functions are expected to total £2.2 billion in 2029-30 whilst ensuring that front line services are prioritised. Individual departments are responsible for delivering these reductions in administrative budgets, which can include savings relating to outsourced providers.
More generally, as part of ongoing contract and commercial management of the suppliers providing services into Government buildings, costs are consistently reviewed and where changes to services or efficiencies identified, these are implemented.
|
Prison Sentences
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Monday 7th April 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of prisoners who have been mis-sentenced to imprisonment for public protection after the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 came into force to abolish the sentence. Answered by Lord Timpson - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 abolished the Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence and it could not be imposed for anyone convicted on or after 03 December 2012. No individuals were convicted after 03 December 2012 and subsequently given an IPP sentence. Nine people were given an IPP sentence in 2013 but all were convicted before the sentence was abolished. |
Construction: Investment
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government which elements of the £600 million investment in construction skills they announced on 23 March have previously been announced or committed to, and which are new and in addition to previous commitments. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Minister for Women and Equalities) My right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, has announced an additional £625 million of funding to support construction skills training, with the detail set out in the Spring Statement 2025. This additional support had not previously been announced or committed. This is expected to deliver up to 60,000 additional skilled construction workers this Parliament. The measures will support the expansion of existing skills programmes, including Skills Bootcamps and apprenticeships, as well as help deliver new initiatives such as establishing ten Technical Excellence Colleges specialised in construction in every region in England. Additional detail on these measures is available from page 29 of the Spring Statement 2025 document, which is attached and can be found at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67e3ecff55239fa04d411fc3/E03274109_HMT_Spring_Statement_Mar_25_Text_PRINT_.pdf. |
Long Covid: Health Services
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 9th April 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what analysis has been undertaken of the variation in the cost of providing first appointments for those presenting with long Covid symptoms at different hospital trusts across England; and what are the highest and lowest per-patient costs for such initial consultations. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) There is an outpatient activity speciality for post-COVID-19 syndrome services, also known as long COVID services, with a treatment function code (TFC) of 348. The average costs for a first-time appointment for those presenting with long COVID symptoms for the 2023/24 financial year were as follows: - for face to face attendance to a consultant-led appointment, the cost was £595; - for face to face attendance to a non-consultant led appointment, the cost was £205; - for non-face to face attendance to a consultant-led appointment, the cost was £595; and - for non-face to face attendance to a non-consultant led appointment, the cost was £205. The attached table shows a breakdown of highest, lowest, and average costs of face to face and non-face to face, as well as consultant led and non-consultant led, appointments for those presenting with long COVID symptoms. Many patients may have been referred to other specialities and then subsequently been identified as suffering from long COVID and may, therefore, be being treated under a different speciality. This could include respiratory medicine, with a TFC of 341, cardiology, with a TFC of 320, and neurology, with a TFC of 400. Outpatients will only include the speciality the patient was seen in, and not what the patient was seen for, unless they were referred to a specific long COVID clinic. The average cost is available on the national cost collection publication on the NHS.UK website, in an online only format. |
Further Education
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Monday 28th April 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government, following the publication of the Curriculum and Assessment Review: interim report, published on 18 March, what plans they have to revisit guidance to allow awarding bodies time to submit new versions of post-16 diploma-size qualifications that overlap with Cycle 1 T Level subjects for approval alongside T Levels routes. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Minister for Women and Equalities) The government considered which qualifications are needed alongside T Levels and A levels in its rapid review of qualifications reform at the end of last year and retained funding for 157 qualifications that were previously due to have funding removed following that review. The government will retain funding for these qualifications until we consider that they are no longer needed. The government also made clear that we will not allow for other types of large qualifications in T Level areas. This is because T Levels are high quality qualifications and should be the qualification of choice for those who wish to study a large qualification in T Level areas. Alongside A levels and T Levels, learners can study alternative level 3 qualifications. These currently include applied general qualifications and technical and vocational qualifications, which are being reformed into Alternative Academic Qualifications and Reformed Technical Qualifications. 74 of these newly reformed level 3 qualifications were approved in May 2024 and will be available to teach from this August, with more to follow in 2026. The department has also removed the additional requirements to the rules of combination until 2027. This change allows providers greater flexibility to create study programmes that best suit individual learner needs. Removing the additional requirements on the rules of combination will ensure that we are not pre-empting recommendations from the Curriculum and Assessment Review on curriculum pathways and longer-term qualifications reform. The department will consider the Review’s recommendations, including on qualification types and sizes, when they are published later this year, and we will update guidance to awarding organisations following our consideration of the Review’s final report. |
Gov Facility Services: Contracts
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 22nd April 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Timpson on 9 April (HL6405), whether they have taken steps to assess the potential for reducing costs and increasing productivity from retaining Gov Facilities Services Limited in-house. Answered by Lord Timpson - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Government Facility Services Limited was created in 2018 as a government company to ensure continuity of facilities management services to prisons in the South and East of England following the collapse of the previous contracted supplier, Carillion. This was always planned to be a transient organisation whilst the Department decided on how the Prison and Probation estate would be maintained in the future. A 2023 assessment conducted in partnership with the Cabinet Office determined that an insourced solution was not the preferred option for future prison maintenance services. The assessment was conducted in line with Cabinet Office guidance and was consistent with the options appraisal approach prescribed by HM Treasury Green Book. Financial analysis determined that an outsourced option would be more cost effective and deliver the best value for money. The value and performance of the Department’s service providers are subject to ongoing contract management and are reviewed and changed, where appropriate, to align with the business requirements. |
Domestic Animals: Transport
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 1st May 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what changes are to be introduced from June in relation to the unrestricted transportation or accompaniment of domestic animals within the Common Travel Area; and what further requirements or registration procedures will be imposed from this summer. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Northern Ireland Pet Travel Scheme will launch on 4 June. This allows for the smooth and straightforward movement of pet dogs (including assistance dogs), cats and ferrets from Great Britain to Northern Ireland while ensuring that any pet movements into EU Member States, including Ireland, remain subject to relevant EU law requirements. The Scheme removes the need for costly health treatments and single use certificates. Instead, pet owners from Great Britain can register for a single, lifelong pet travel document, which confirms that the pet is microchipped and will not move into the European Union. Further information can be found here - Taking your pet dog, cat or ferret abroad: Travelling to Northern Ireland - GOV.UK.
Pet owners in Northern Ireland will not face any requirements beyond the need for their pet to be microchipped. |
Government Departments: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 6th May 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 April (HL6031), whether the Cabinet Office has issued guidance in respect of departmental headcount reduction to ensure that outsourced services match the cost reduction and efficiency gains imposed on in-house services. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) There are numerous government arms-length bodies and agencies that spend public money, including to deliver services on behalf of government departments. These bodies have specified budgets and are accountable to the relevant government department. Financial planning for these bodies is therefore part of each department’s spending review process. |
Government Departments: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 6th May 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 April (HL6031), whether they have issued guidance to departments to avoid headcount and expenditure reductions arising not from internal efficiency and increased productivity, but from outsourcing activities. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) There are numerous government arms-length bodies and agencies that spend public money, including to deliver services on behalf of government departments. These bodies have specified budgets and are accountable to the relevant government department. Financial planning for these bodies is therefore part of each department’s spending review process. |
NHS: Staff
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Friday 9th May 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance they have issued to integrated care boards in England about (1) the projected reduction in headcount as a result of the abolition of NHS England, and (2) the balance between maintaining staff (a) at the 'place' level and, (b) in the integrated care board administration. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England has asked the integrated care boards (ICBs) to act primarily as strategic commissioners of health and care services and to reduce the duplication of responsibilities within their structure to achieve a 50% cost reduction in their running cost allowance. NHS England provided additional guidance to ICBs, National Health Service trusts, and NHS foundation trusts on 1 April 2025, where ICBs were tasked with developing plans by the end of May setting out how they will manage their resources to deliver across their priorities. The Government understands the importance of communities and places, which is why NHS England will be working closely with the ICBs to support the development of these plans, ensuring that their implementation reduces duplication and supports patient care. We continue to analyse and assess impacts of all kinds and will work collaboratively across both organisations to put in place plans to ensure the continuity of services and patient safety. |
Skills England: Membership
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 8th May 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government when they expect to announce the full membership of the board of Skills England. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Minister for Women and Equalities) The government announced the executive and non-executive leadership team of Skills England on 11 February. The chair of the board is Phil Smith, former chief executive officer (CEO) of Cisco UK and Ireland, and the vice chair is Sir David Bell, vice chancellor of the University of Sunderland. Sarah Maclean and Tessa Griffiths jointly serve as CEOs of Skills England, and Gemma Marsh is deputy CEO. The government has also been recruiting additional non-executive board members for Skills England. The department received a large number of high-calibre applicants, who have undergone a rigorous selection process to ensure a diverse Board with the necessary skills and experience to support and challenge Skills England in its vital work. The full membership of the Board will be announced in due course. |
Live Transcript |
---|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
2 Apr 2025, 4:35 p.m. - House of Lords "only those put forward by Lord Blunkett, that find the way forward, that I'm mentioning. The Government " Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:03 p.m. - House of Lords "and 30 5A, Lord Blunkett. >> I stand to move amendments and 35 a and (Consequential Amendments) on " Lord Blunkett (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:11 p.m. - House of Lords "friend, Lord Blunkett, who has been " Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:11 p.m. - House of Lords "name and could I also thank Baroness Jones of old Scone, Lord Blunkett " Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:21 p.m. - House of Lords "all of the discussions that I have had with my friend Lord Blunkett and " Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:25 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lord Lord Hendy has been able to bring these commandments in the name of the noble Lord Lord Blunkett " Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:19 p.m. - House of Lords "indeed as Lord Blunkett pointed out, there are potential solutions that " Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:45 p.m. - House of Lords " I would like to support the intention behind the amendment, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett. I agree very much with Lord Berkeley's comments, particularly about enforcement. I " Lord Burns (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:53 p.m. - House of Lords "loudly and clearly today. Lord Blunkett has tabled his own amendments which I welcome and I " Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:55 p.m. - House of Lords "and I'm the Conservative frontbench The noble Lord Lord Blunkett knows that I have the highest personal " Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:56 p.m. - House of Lords "not object to the amendments in the name of the noble Lord Lord Blunkett, if my noble friend Lord " Lord Moylan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 4:59 p.m. - House of Lords "friend Lord Blunkett, in that it requires the Secretary of State to " Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 5 p.m. - House of Lords "receive guidance on this matter stop however my noble friend Lord Blunkett has gone further in this amendment and stated this guidance has to be in place, within three " Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 5:01 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Blunkett has tabled three more amendments, and 35 a provides that the guidance and safety and accessibility of stopping places is " Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
2 Apr 2025, 5:21 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Amendments 36, A, and 36, B, Lord Blunkett moved formally. The " Division - View Video - View Transcript |
29 Apr 2025, 3:29 p.m. - House of Lords "colleagues for their contributions. And likewise Lord Hampton, Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb, Lord Blunkett and Lord Holmes for their " Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
29 Apr 2025, 3:37 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lord Blunkett, saw improvements made to the bill in relation to floating bus stops. On the back of which I think we would " Lord Moylan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
29 Apr 2025, 3:26 p.m. - House of Lords "my noble friend Lord Blunkett at report. I'm grateful to my noble " Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 1:15 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Lady, Baroness Morris and the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett and also my namesake, Baroness Morgan who " Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 1:31 p.m. - House of Lords "that Lord Blunkett and I found ourselves in agreement. In fact it usually signals that something truly extraordinary has happened in " Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 6:01 p.m. - House of Lords "of children. Will the Government at least listen to the wisdom of their own Lord Blunkett. " Baroness Fleet (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 6:01 p.m. - House of Lords "own Lord Blunkett. own Lord Blunkett. " Baroness Fleet (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 6:24 p.m. - House of Lords "from Lord Baker to Lord Blunkett and Lord Adonis and Baroness Morgan, " Baroness Finn (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 6:30 p.m. - House of Lords "staff and both Baroness Shephard and Lord Blunkett emphasised the need to support the brilliant head teachers " Baroness Finn (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 1:58 p.m. - House of Lords "we can retain a measure of diversity. I was very encouraged to hear the Lord Blunkett say we should " Lord Hannan of Kingsclere (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 3:20 p.m. - House of Lords "informed debate. Lord Blunkett showed appropriate preparedness to accept responsibility for the state " Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 5:26 p.m. - House of Lords "were continued by Lord Blunkett in the learning and schools act of 2,000 which created city academies " Lord Young of Acton (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
1 May 2025, 5:26 p.m. - House of Lords "Hill pointed out. Lord Blunkett said earlier he hoped all sides could " Lord Young of Acton (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
160 speeches (59,176 words) Thursday 1st May 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for International Development Mentions: 1: Lord Baker of Dorking (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I am delighted to follow my friend, the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett. - Link to Speech 2: Lord Scriven (LD - Life peer) It is not often that the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, and I find ourselves in agreement—in fact, it usually - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Fleet (Con - Life peer) Will the Government at least listen to the wisdom of their own noble Lord, Lord Blunkett? - Link to Speech 4: Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab - Life peer) That is what happens when the power of my noble friend Lord Blunkett and the noble Lord, Lord Baker—the - Link to Speech |
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL]
14 speeches (2,167 words) 3rd reading Tuesday 29th April 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) Government tabling a package of amendments and supporting those brought forward by my noble friend Lord Blunkett - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Pidgeon (LD - Life peer) Likewise, I thank in particular the noble Lords, Lord Hampton, Lord Blunkett and Lord Holmes, and the - Link to Speech 3: Lord Moylan (Con - Life peer) worth noting the flanking action by my noble friend Lord Holmes of Richmond and the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett - Link to Speech |
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL]
88 speeches (14,744 words) Report stage Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Transport Mentions: 1: None Alternatively, as the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, pointed out, there are potential solutions that are - Link to Speech 2: None Certainly, one of the most important amendments from the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, Amendment 35A, will - Link to Speech 3: Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green - Life peer) I do not know whether that pre-dates the interest of the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, but it seems like - Link to Speech 4: Lord Burns (XB - Life peer) My Lords, I support the intention behind the amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, and - Link to Speech 5: None My noble friend Lord Blunkett has tabled three more amendments to support accessibility on buses. - Link to Speech |
Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords]
74 speeches (18,029 words) Report stage Monday 31st March 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Education Mentions: 1: Ian Sollom (LD - St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire) That concern was echoed by Lord Blunkett, who suggested that“there is a real danger that IfATE will swamp - Link to Speech 2: None I think the noble Lord Blunkett estimated that close to 200 people would come into the organisation. - Link to Speech 3: Neil O'Brien (Con - Harborough, Oadby and Wigston) Lord Blunkett said in the other place:“When two years ago I led on the learning and skills document that - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Apr. 01 2025
HL Bill 72-II(a) Amendments for Report (Supplementary to the Second Marshalled List) Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD BLUNKETT 35A★_ Clause 25, page 24, line 37, at end insert “, or— (c) enabling persons with disabilities |