Information between 16th March 2026 - 26th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 171 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 112 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 110 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 110 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 118 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 107 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 113 |
|
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 159 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 137 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Lord Blunkett voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Refugees
Asked by: Lord Blunkett (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 17th March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government further to the announcement by the Home Secretary on 2 March that refugee protection is to be reviewed every 30 months, whether earned settlement will still exist for those with a legitimate right to be in the UK, seeking continuing leave to remain and a pathway to naturalisation. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) From 2 March 2026, adults and accompanied children who qualify for refugee status and humanitarian protection will be granted Core Protection for 30 months, which can be renewed as necessary. Those who remain on Core Protection can apply for settlement after 20 years. However, refugees will be encouraged, where possible, to switch into a new, bespoke protection work and study route which will enable them to access settlement rights sooner. Settlement remains the normal route to naturalisation as a British citizen, which will continue to be available to those who meet the statutory requirements set out in the British Nationality Act 1981. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
19 Mar 2026, 12:38 a.m. - House of Lords "But the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, as he then wasn't, was very happy to assure us that everything was " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Mar 2026, 2:34 p.m. - House of Lords "of Cookham, the noble Lord Lord Shipley, noble Baroness Lea, Baron Noble, Lord Lord Blunkett, and the " Amendment:93 Lord Ravensdale (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Mar 2026, 3:25 p.m. - House of Lords "was I was happy to give my name to the amendment. And Lord Blunkett, who cannot be here today, asked me " Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Mar 2026, 3:43 p.m. - House of Lords "parking. I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Blunkett for tabling an amendment at Committee stage on " Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Mar 2026, 4:43 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Amendments one, three five and 138 standing in my name with Lord Blunkett. And I will also speak to " Amendment:135 Lord Rees of Easton (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 21st April 2026 10:30 a.m. Retirement and Participation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |