Information between 17th September 2026 - 27th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 17th November 2026 Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Future electricity demands for data centres and transport View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 67 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 173 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 155 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 165 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
High Speed 2 Line: Tunnels
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 8th October 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the maximum allowable operating speed in the HS2 Phase 1 tunnels. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) HS2 will now operate to a maximum permissible overall line speed of 320 km/h, this includes all tunnels on the route. |
|
Apprentices: Shipping
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Friday 25th September 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what route will remain available for apprentices to gain the necessary qualifications for relevant posts in the absence of the apprenticeship for small commercial vessel crewmembers; and what alternatives are available to young people who wish to pursue a maritime career in general. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The government recognises the importance of maritime apprenticeships in helping employers develop a skilled workforce. Skills England works with employers and sector bodies to develop and maintain a range of maritime apprenticeship standards, ensuring they reflect employer needs.
Skills England is consulting with stakeholders on retiring some occupational standards. This is often due to low levels of new starts or delivery challenges, including limited provider availability. In this context, "retirement" means that the apprenticeship would close to new starts, while existing apprentices would normally be able to complete their training. The consultation is still live and so no final decision has been taken.
Information on the number of apprentices who may be affected in each region of England is not currently available, as no decision has been taken.
Young people wishing to pursue maritime careers can access a range of technical qualifications and employer-led training programmes. For more information please see, Occupational Maps: Skills England.
To further increase apprenticeship opportunities, the Government is introducing a £2,000 apprenticeship hiring payment for non-levy paying employers who recruit 16 to 24-year-olds as new apprentice employees. In addition, apprenticeship training is now fully funded for all eligible under-25s at employers of all sizes, helping more young people access opportunities in sectors such as maritime. |
|
Apprentices: Shipping
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Friday 25th September 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they have taken to encourage the take-up of small commercial vessel crewmember apprenticeships, and other maritime employment programmes. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The government recognises the importance of maritime apprenticeships in helping employers develop a skilled workforce. Skills England works with employers and sector bodies to develop and maintain a range of maritime apprenticeship standards, ensuring they reflect employer needs.
Skills England is consulting with stakeholders on retiring some occupational standards. This is often due to low levels of new starts or delivery challenges, including limited provider availability. In this context, "retirement" means that the apprenticeship would close to new starts, while existing apprentices would normally be able to complete their training. The consultation is still live and so no final decision has been taken.
Information on the number of apprentices who may be affected in each region of England is not currently available, as no decision has been taken.
Young people wishing to pursue maritime careers can access a range of technical qualifications and employer-led training programmes. For more information please see, Occupational Maps: Skills England.
To further increase apprenticeship opportunities, the Government is introducing a £2,000 apprenticeship hiring payment for non-levy paying employers who recruit 16 to 24-year-olds as new apprentice employees. In addition, apprenticeship training is now fully funded for all eligible under-25s at employers of all sizes, helping more young people access opportunities in sectors such as maritime. |
|
Apprentices: Shipping
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Friday 25th September 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask His Majesty's Government why they are proposing to retire the apprenticeship for small commercial vessel crewmembers; what is meant by "retirement" in this context; and how many apprentices will be affected in each region of England. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The government recognises the importance of maritime apprenticeships in helping employers develop a skilled workforce. Skills England works with employers and sector bodies to develop and maintain a range of maritime apprenticeship standards, ensuring they reflect employer needs.
Skills England is consulting with stakeholders on retiring some occupational standards. This is often due to low levels of new starts or delivery challenges, including limited provider availability. In this context, "retirement" means that the apprenticeship would close to new starts, while existing apprentices would normally be able to complete their training. The consultation is still live and so no final decision has been taken.
Information on the number of apprentices who may be affected in each region of England is not currently available, as no decision has been taken.
Young people wishing to pursue maritime careers can access a range of technical qualifications and employer-led training programmes. For more information please see, Occupational Maps: Skills England.
To further increase apprenticeship opportunities, the Government is introducing a £2,000 apprenticeship hiring payment for non-levy paying employers who recruit 16 to 24-year-olds as new apprentice employees. In addition, apprenticeship training is now fully funded for all eligible under-25s at employers of all sizes, helping more young people access opportunities in sectors such as maritime. |
|
Business Rates and Income Tax: Rural Areas
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 28th September 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the fiscal devolution roadmap, to be published alongside the Autumn Budget, will include a weighting for rural sparsity and remoteness within the arrangements for the retention of business rates and income tax by strategic authorities; and whether those arrangements will provide for a minimum level of fiscal capacity below which no authority will fall. Answered by Lord Pitt-Watson - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) The government is committed to supporting local leaders to drive growth and improve public services.
In the Cabinet Statement on ‘Rewiring the State’ the government committed to replace grants from central government with a share of local income tax for every mayor beginning in 2028, such that where a region grows its tax base, it benefits from the increased receipts. This will sit alongside greater retention of the revenue from business rates for local councils and strategic authorities.
At the Budget, the government will publish a roadmap setting out further detail on the design of fiscal devolution, and we will use the upcoming Spending Review to confirm the detailed arrangements for assigned income tax. |
|
Rural Areas: Devolution
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 28th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to require strategic authorities with a significant rural population to set out, in their local growth plans and spatial development strategies, how rural communities will benefit from devolved investment; and whether any such requirement would form part of their plan sign-off and annual reporting. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Government recognises that local leaders are best placed to understand and respond to the specific characteristics of their area. As such, Local Growth Plans are locally owned, allowing strategic authorities to determine how to use devolved funding and powers to support growth in a way that reflects local challenges and opportunities, and this is reflected in our supporting guidance. Spatial Development Strategies must contain policies addressing issues of strategic importance across the whole of the strategic planning authority’s area, and they must have regard to the need to be consistent with national policies, which is tested by an independent examiner prior to adoption. The new National Planning Policy Framework includes a number of policies to support rural communities, including by setting out support for rural businesses and services, and setting expectations that development plans allocate sites for housing that will support and enhance the vitality of rural communities and enable villages to grow and thrive.
|
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 28th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to set out a time-bound and resourced route by which foundation strategic authorities may progress to the full devolved settlement; and what steps they are taking to ensure that areas without a mayoral strategic authority are not left with materially weaker powers and protections. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Our ambition is that every area in England has, or is in the process of establishing, a Strategic Authority by the end of 2027, with Strategic Authorities in place everywhere by the end of 2028. The Government recently wrote to all areas without a Strategic Authority seeking confirmation of their devolution ambitions, including their preferences regarding mayoral or non-mayoral devolution. Where an area favours a non-mayoral Foundation Strategic Authority, and for existing Foundation Strategic Authorities, we will work with them on potential future mayoral devolution. The Government will not impose mayors on areas that do not want one, but we do consider that directly accountable mayors represent the strongest form of governance available, and so the suite of powers available to areas with mayors will be commensurately greater. However, we will consider what powers should sit at the Foundation Strategic Authority level, and recently government confirmed that Foundation Strategic Authorities will be able to raise an Overnight Visitor Levy in their area. |
|
Rural Areas: Public Appointments
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 28th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to provide for the appointment of commissioners in rural areas within strategic authorities that meet a defined rural population threshold such as 20 per cent; and what assessment they have made of the powers to be made available for that purpose under the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026 enables mayors to appoint commissioners to support delivery within areas of competence set out in the Act. These appointments are discretionary and mayors are not required to appoint commissioners in relation to any specific issue or geography. The Act includes rural affairs and coastal communities as an area of competence. Where a mayor considers it appropriate, they may appoint a commissioner whose work relates to that area and provide them with a locally appropriate brief reflecting the needs and priorities of their communities. The Government has no plans to require the appointment of commissioners in authorities that meet a specified rural population threshold. |
|
Palace of Westminster: Artworks
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 26th October 2026 Question To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker whether the official portraits of HM Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh in the Royal Gallery in the Palace of Westminster will be replaced by portraits of the current King and Queen; and if so, when. Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede This matter is under consideration by the Lord Speaker’s Advisory Panel on Works of Art, in discussion with the House of Lords administration and the Royal Household. An announcement will be made in due course. |
|
Rolling Stock: Procurement
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the rolling stock and infrastructure strategy, published on 28 September, whether the procurement process for rolling stock and services will be open to non-UK companies to tender and whether the appraisals of tenders submitted will comply with competition law. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Rolling Stock and Infrastructure Strategy does not alter the legal framework governing procurement or competition. Rolling stock and rail service procurements will continue to be conducted in accordance with the relevant procurement legislation and other applicable legal requirements, including non-discrimination against treaty state suppliers, with the aim of securing the best value for passengers and taxpayers. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
12 Oct 2026, 7:24 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "119 Lord Berkeley not moved 119 a Baroness Lang of Elderslie " Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 7:24 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lang not moved 123 Lord Berkeley not moved. " Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 7:24 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley not moved 127 " Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 8:02 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "The noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, points out that if safety is your top " Speaker 2 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 8:23 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "So there is again, as the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley said, there's a " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 8:33 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley pointed out, I didn't support it really a word he said, but it was kind of him " Speaker 8 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 5:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "name of noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 5:58 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "this and thank you to noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, for drawing the attention of the committee to this important " Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 6 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "And when the time comes, I hope the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, will persist " Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 6:11 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "205, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, to which I've added my name. " Speaker 5 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 7:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "So whilst the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, doesn't see the need for this group of amendments and " Speaker 19 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Oct 2026, 5:39 p.m. - House of Lords "about the position of the Duchy of Lancaster, Lord Berkeley, about the. " Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Oct 2026, 5:32 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord, Lord Berkeley said, it was it. It's our job to do the scrutiny " Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Oct 2026, 5:32 p.m. - House of Lords "Lord Sikka, or the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. But I will leave the Minister to respond to their wider " Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Oct 2026, 4:30 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "And indeed, Lord Berkeley, my noble friend Lord Berkeley, mentioned that " Speaker 7 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 3:49 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "friends and by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 2 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 3:48 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "The noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, rightly emphasized the importance of independent assessment of capacity. " Speaker 2 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 4:04 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "And 268 Lord Berkeley not moved and two six a and 269 Lord Berkeley not moved, moved an amendment to" Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 4:04 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Baroness Pidgeon moved, moved 271 Lord Berkeley moved, moved. " Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 5:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "content. The contents have it in clause 82, amendment 294 and two and 295 . Not moved 296. Lord Berkeley" Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 5:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley moved, not moved. " Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 5:59 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "many as are of that opinion will say content, content and not content. The contents have it in clause 87, amendment 305. Lord Berkeley not moved, moved" Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 7:14 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "I'm delighted for once to agree with my noble friend Lord Berkeley, that clause 95 is a good thing. " Speaker 13 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
26 Oct 2026, 5:11 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Amendment 280 Lord Berkeley" Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Oct 2026, 8:18 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley not moved moved. " Speaker 14 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Oct 2026, 4:12 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "And this was a question raised by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 6 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Oct 2026, 6:14 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Amendment 185 Lord Berkeley not moved moved. " Speaker 18 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Oct 2026, 5:06 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "friend, Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 2 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 6:13 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "lists. And I hope that reassures that reassures both noble Lords and my noble Lord Moylan and my noble friend Lord Berkeley, that they can withdraw their amendments. " Speaker 7 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 6:15 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "this legislation, and the noble Lord Berkeley spoke to various amendments, but I think he will find that they're all in the next group, and I hope to respond to those amendments" Speaker 7 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 6:55 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "saying that transparency, which the noble Lord, my noble friend Lord Berkeley raised is, is baked into this process. " Speaker 7 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 6:56 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 15 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 8:22 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Moylan and Lord Berkeley on this. " Speaker 18 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 7:58 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "contents have it in clause 66251 Lord Moylan moved 251 a Lord Berkeley not. " Speaker 18 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 7:59 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, for putting his name to my, my, my First Amendment in this group. " Speaker 16 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 9:10 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "So the amendments that Lord Berkeley and I" Speaker 13 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 6:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley moved, moved and 239 Lord Berkeley. " Speaker 15 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 7:26 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "As my noble friend Lord Berkeley has," Speaker 14 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Oct 2026, 7:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "243 A and 244 Lord Berkeley not moved two four 5 to 2 four seven. Lord Moylan not moved. " Speaker 18 - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 12 Meeting 16 September 2026 Science and Technology Committee Found: Apologies and notices Apologies were received from Lord Berkeley, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Friday 16th October 2026
Department for Transport Source Page: Letter dated 12/10/2026 from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Lord Berkeley regarding Wi-Fi implementation, as discussed during the Committee stage (third day) of the Railways Bill. 3p. Document: Letter_from_lord_Hendy_to_Lord_BerkeleyWi_Fi.docx (webpage) Found: Letter dated 12/10/2026 from Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill to Lord Berkeley regarding Wi-Fi implementation |
|
Friday 16th October 2026
Source Page: Letter dated 13/10/2026 from Lord Wilson of Sedgefield to Lord Berkeley regarding the Government’s position on snail farms as a form of business rates avoidance, as discussed during the Oral Question on Business Rates Avoidance Schemes. 2p. Document: Letter_from_Lord_Wilson_to_Lord_Berkeley_13October2026.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 13/10/2026 from Lord Wilson of Sedgefield to Lord Berkeley regarding the Government’s position |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 3rd November 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th November 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th October 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th October 2026 10 a.m. Science and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Tuesday 3rd November 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Rt Hon Ian Murray MP, Minister of State, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and Michael Shanks MP, Minister of State, Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 3rd November 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 14 Meeting 27 October 2026 Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 12 Meeting 16 September 2026 Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 27th October 2026
Minutes and decisions - Minutes 13 Meeting 13 October 2026 Science and Technology Committee |