Information between 2nd September 2026 - 12th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 144 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 115 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 119 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Lord Berkeley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 63 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Berkeley speeches from: Railways Bill
Lord Berkeley contributed 5 speeches (789 words) Committee stage Thursday 10th September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Transport |
|
Lord Berkeley speeches from: Railways Bill
Lord Berkeley contributed 7 speeches (1,830 words) Committee stage Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Transport |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Euston Station: Regeneration
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government which elements of the Euston Master Plan Development will be funded by (1) the private sector, and (2) the public sector; and which department will administer any public funding. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Euston Development Masterplan is a joint Department for Transport and Network Rail project, with delivery contracted to a joint venture between Lendlease and The Crown Estate. Public funding, administered by the Department for Transport, will support enabling works and contribute towards the costs of developing the masterplan. The majority of the project will be funded by the private sector, with the Department for Transport and Network Rail sharing in the value generated from development.
|
|
Euston Delivery Company
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government how the Euston Development Company is funded; and how much, if any, of its funding will come from the public sector. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) In April, the Euston Delivery Company (EDC) was established as the single directing mind for the Euston programme. Currently, the EDC team is operating as a business unit within the Department for Transport, with its activities funded via existing departmental arrangements. Further details on its future funding arrangements will be confirmed as the company is formally established as a public body, which is expected to take place in the Autumn. |
|
High Speed 2 Line: Costs
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of (1) the projected outstanding cost of HS2 as of 1 April 2026, and (2) the proportion of which allocated to the development of Euston station and the Euston approaches. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) The Government announced in May 2026, the expected cost of delivering HS2 is now in the range of £87.7 - 102.7 billion. This is expressed in a mixed price base, including the cash outturn of works to date and the costs of future work excluding inflation. This is an initial assessment that will mature further as the work is refined into a full programme baseline. Drawing on lessons learned from previous experience, the Department is taking the time to complete the necessary work to establish a robust baseline before seeking to set budgets for Euston.
|
|
High Speed 2 Line: Cost Effectiveness
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government what alternatives they evaluated when seeking to reduce the cost of the HS2 connection between Old Oak Common and Euston. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) No other alternatives to reduce the cost of the connection between Old Oak Common and Euston were identified at the time of the Government's decision to proceed with the Euston tunnel. The existing tunnelling plans are the most cost-effective approach, as Old Oak Common station's construction has been set up for this purpose.
If this decision had not been made at this time, there would have been likely cost and schedule impacts to the delivery of Old Oak Common station, and potentially to the wider HS2 programme. |
|
High Speed 2 Line: Rolling Stock
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government how many HS2 200m train sets are now on order; and whether the train set capital expenditure is included in the projected HS2 cost or is a leasing cost to the chosen operator. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) There are 54 x 200m trains on order with the Hitachi-Alstom Joint Venture. The capital expenditure for purchasing these trains is included in the published HS2 cost ranges.
|
|
Hospitals: Air Ambulance Services
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Friday 11th September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of establishing an emergency hospital helipad infrastructure contingency fund alongside the existing support provided by the Helicopter Emergency Landing Pads Appeal to secure future hospital helipad provision. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided on 11 September 2026 in response to Question HL2845, which, for ease of reference, is reproduced below. The Government recognises the important role that hospital helipads can play in supporting emergency and specialist care pathways. However, it has not established, and is not currently considering, a dedicated contingency fund for hospital helipad infrastructure. Decisions on capital investment are primarily taken by National Health Service organisations and systems, which must balance a range of competing clinical and estate priorities within available resources. Where helipad infrastructure is identified as a local priority, NHS organisations may consider how best to support these requirements, including through charitable contributions such as those provided by the HELP Appeal. |
|
Air Ambulance Services
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 9th September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to introduce new NHS policy to ensure that major trauma centres have safeguarded, on-site hospital helipads available 24/7 for air ambulance operations. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided in the House of Commons on 16 July 2026 to Question 18083, which, for ease of reference, is reproduced below. The Government recognises the important role that hospital helipads play in supporting the transfer of critically ill patients and accessing specialist services. Responsibility for the provision and management of hospital helipads rests with local National Health Service organisations, working with relevant planning, aviation, and local authority bodies. The Department continues to work with NHS England, the Civil Aviation Authority, and other partners to consider issues relating to hospital helipad access and resilience. While there are currently no plans to mandate safeguarded 24/7 on-site helipads through national requirements, the Government will keep this position under review in light of emerging evidence and operational requirements. |
|
Air Ambulance Services
Asked by: Lord Berkeley (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 9th September 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the availability of 24/7 on-site hospital helipad access at major trauma centres and specialist hospitals in supporting NHS resilience and major incident preparedness. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) I refer the Noble Lord to the answer provided in the House of Commons on 16 July 2026 to Question 18083, which, for ease of reference, is reproduced below. The Government recognises the important role that hospital helipads play in supporting the transfer of critically ill patients and accessing specialist services. Responsibility for the provision and management of hospital helipads rests with local National Health Service organisations, working with relevant planning, aviation, and local authority bodies. The Department continues to work with NHS England, the Civil Aviation Authority, and other partners to consider issues relating to hospital helipad access and resilience. While there are currently no plans to mandate safeguarded 24/7 on-site helipads through national requirements, the Government will keep this position under review in light of emerging evidence and operational requirements. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Sep 2026, 8:42 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "turning to amendment 296 and the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, which specifies that GBR should consult on access " Speaker 15 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 5:57 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "And finally, on amendment 100 305 from the noble Lord, my noble friend Lord Berkeley, I can assure my noble friend " Speaker 4 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Sep 2026, 7:35 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Amendment 11 Lord Berkeley not moved. " Speaker 16 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Sep 2026, 1:56 p.m. - Lords Grand Committee "Lord Berkeley debated. Not moved. " Speaker 9 - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Railways Bill
133 speeches (28,833 words) Committee stage Thursday 10th September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Lord Moylan (Con - Life peer) from the Minister for the first time.The amendments tabled by the noble Lords, Lord Blunkett and Lord Berkeley - Link to Speech 2: None Amendment 89, tabled by my noble friend Lord Berkeley is also about financial transparency. - Link to Speech |
|
Railways Bill
119 speeches (35,059 words) Committee stage Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Grand Committee Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Lord Harper (Con - Life peer) My Lords, I will start by referring to the amendment that the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, talked to, because - Link to Speech 2: None The amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, raises a really important point, because lorries and - Link to Speech 3: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) case, we have to let the market determine its contribution.On Amendment 305 from my noble friend Lord Berkeley - Link to Speech 4: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) Government therefore consider these amendments unnecessary.Finally, Amendment 296 from the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 3rd September 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Jeffrey Travers DHS0020 - Delivering HS2 and Euston Public Accounts Committee Found: arithmetical inconsistencies in DfT answers to questions about passenger modelling raised by Lord Berkeley |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Lord Mair to Rt Hon. Jonathan Reynolds MP, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Rt Hon. Jonathan Reynolds MP, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 11th meeting 8 September 2026 Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 8th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 10th meeting 1 September 2026 Science and Technology Committee |
|
Tuesday 1st September 2026
Formal Minutes - Minutes 9th meeting 21 July 2026 Science and Technology Committee |