Debates between Lord Beith and Steve Barclay during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Liaison Committee Report

Debate between Lord Beith and Steve Barclay
Thursday 12th December 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Beith Portrait Sir Alan Beith
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman raises some important issues, which have been discussed in the context of the Government’s own more limited reform, which they have canvassed hitherto. These are certainly issues that need to be looked at by such a commission. If it is the Government’s belief that there needs to be more personalisation of senior appointments in the civil service—I believe that is their view—that raises issues arising out of the traditional role of the civil service that ought to be considered carefully and be embarked upon with the authority of both Houses of Parliament in the kind of context that such a commission could set.

Steve Barclay Portrait Stephen Barclay (North East Cambridgeshire) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that we would be more effective at holding officials to account if we improved our own accountability? For example, the Speaker’s Commission is still unelected and has no one from an intake after 2001, which is more than half the House. Select Committee powers are very opaque. We have parliamentary orders ignored, as in the case of the BBC with pay-offs. We give significant powers to officials on Bill Committees and do not have the expertise of Members with recognised experience in those areas. Should we not be showing a little more and telling a little less, even when it comes to savings and transformational change, which is what we are seeking from Whitehall but not always delivering ourselves?